Hi Tom,
Thanks for the update, the root cause is that iptables offers
a kernel header file include/linux/types.h, but it mis-matches
the kernel in the sysroot, we can add this:
#define __aligned_u64 __u64 __attribute__((aligned(8)))
to:
iptables-1.4.12.2/include/linux/types.h
to fix this pro
Robert Yang wrote on 2012-03-06:
> Hi Tom,
> Thanks for the update, the root cause is that iptables offers a kernel
> header file include/linux/types.h, but it mis-matches the kernel in
> the sysroot, we can add this:
> #define __aligned_u64 __u64 __attribute__((aligned(8)))
> to:
> iptables-1.4.12
On 03/06/2012 05:47 PM, Cui, Dexuan wrote:
Robert Yang wrote on 2012-03-06:
Hi Tom,
Thanks for the update, the root cause is that iptables offers a kernel
header file include/linux/types.h, but it mis-matches the kernel in
the sysroot, we can add this:
#define __aligned_u64 __u64 __attribute__
Hi Dexuan,
After more investigation, I found that the:
-I/path/to/sysroot/usr/include
has been treated as the standard system include directory,
and from gcc's manual:
-I dir
Add the directory dir to the list of directories to be searched for
header files. Directories named by
Op 6 mrt. 2012, om 07:48 heeft Tom Zanussi het volgende geschreven:
> In the meantime, if you remove the line:
>
> PREFERRED_PROVIDER_linux-libc-headers ?= "linux-libc-headers-yocto"
Why is a BSP layer poking at DISTRO settings?!?!?![1]
koen
[1] Yes RP, that really needed that many exclamatio
On 12-03-06 06:41 AM, Robert Yang wrote:
Hi Dexuan,
After more investigation, I found that the:
-I/path/to/sysroot/usr/include
has been treated as the standard system include directory,
and from gcc's manual:
-I dir
Add the directory dir to the list of directories to be searched for
header
On 03/06/2012 01:04 AM, Robert Yang wrote:
Hi Tom,
Thanks for the update, the root cause is that iptables offers
a kernel header file include/linux/types.h, but it mis-matches
the kernel in the sysroot, we can add this:
#define __aligned_u64 __u64 __attribute__((aligned(8)))
to:
iptables-1.4
On 03/06/2012 11:16 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
On 03/06/2012 01:04 AM, Robert Yang wrote:
Hi Tom,
Thanks for the update, the root cause is that iptables offers
a kernel header file include/linux/types.h, but it mis-matches
the kernel in the sysroot, we can add this:
#define __aligned_u64 __u64 __a
On 03/06/2012 07:21 AM, Robert Yang wrote:
On 03/06/2012 11:16 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
On 03/06/2012 01:04 AM, Robert Yang wrote:
Hi Tom,
Thanks for the update, the root cause is that iptables offers
a kernel header file include/linux/types.h, but it mis-matches
the kernel in the sysroot, we ca
On 12-03-06 10:24 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
On 03/06/2012 07:21 AM, Robert Yang wrote:
On 03/06/2012 11:16 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
On 03/06/2012 01:04 AM, Robert Yang wrote:
Hi Tom,
Thanks for the update, the root cause is that iptables offers
a kernel header file include/linux/types.h, but it mis-m
From: Tom Zanussi
This patch removes the PREFERRED_PROVIDER setting libc headers in
ia32-base in preference to the disro setting, which it should be using instead.
The following changes since commit 87f409827684e39484900a20531c8a14c0cb91e6:
meta-emenlow: add SRC_URI checksums to libva (2012-0
From: Tom Zanussi
Let the distro do this.
Signed-off-by: Tom Zanussi
---
conf/machine/include/ia32-base.inc |1 -
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/conf/machine/include/ia32-base.inc
b/conf/machine/include/ia32-base.inc
index 8556d6e..1fb09b1 100644
--- a/conf
On Tue, 2012-03-06 at 13:14 +0100, Koen Kooi wrote:
> Op 6 mrt. 2012, om 07:48 heeft Tom Zanussi het volgende geschreven:
>
> > In the meantime, if you remove the line:
> >
> > PREFERRED_PROVIDER_linux-libc-headers ?= "linux-libc-headers-yocto"
>
> Why is a BSP layer poking at DISTRO settings?!?
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 7:27 AM, Bruce Ashfield
wrote:
> Nominally it is to protect them from kernel headers changes and to not
> require headers or a full tree to be present (or at least this is what
> I've learned over the years, I may be forgetting other elements).
>
but thats what linux-kernel
On 12-03-06 12:28 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 7:27 AM, Bruce Ashfield
wrote:
Nominally it is to protect them from kernel headers changes and to not
require headers or a full tree to be present (or at least this is what
I've learned over the years, I may be forgetting other eleme
On 03/01/2012 02:26 PM, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
The g_ether kernel module, in the kernel-module-g-ether package,
allows targets to use a USB connection as a network interface.
However, that's not useful until the module is loaded.
The usbinit package provides the /etc/init.d/usb-gether script
16 matches
Mail list logo