Hello all,
Does Yocto support initramfs build?
Best Regards,
Zhenhua
___
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
Op 28 feb. 2012, om 23:28 heeft Robert P. J. Day het volgende geschreven:
> On Tue, 28 Feb 2012, Koen Kooi wrote:
>
>>
>> Op 28 feb. 2012, om 22:55 heeft Robert P. J. Day het volgende geschreven:
>>
>>> On Tue, 28 Feb 2012, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
>>>
It is true that the beagleboard is a h
i want to do a short writeup on the *simplest* recipe for how to run
the pre-built yocto qemu image you can get here:
http://downloads.yoctoproject.org/releases/yocto/yocto-1.1/machines/qemu/
and what should have been a simple procedure got a bit messy. to be
clear, i want to document the abs
On Friday 02 March 2012 06:57:57 Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> ok, it *has* to be easier than this. quite simply, if one wants to
> do nothing more than *run* one of those qemu images, there should be
> no need to do any building or bitbaking, should there? am i missing
> something hideously obviou
On Fri, 2 Mar 2012, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> On Friday 02 March 2012 06:57:57 Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > ok, it *has* to be easier than this. quite simply, if one wants
> > to do nothing more than *run* one of those qemu images, there
> > should be no need to do any building or bitbaking, should
On Friday 02 March 2012 07:16:08 Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> i gathered that. but is it unreasonable to suggest that this is
> something that *should* be easy to do? if new users simply want to
> see what a yocto-generated image looks like under qemu, shouldn't
> there be a way to let them do tha
On Fri, 2 Mar 2012, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> On Friday 02 March 2012 07:16:08 Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > i gathered that. but is it unreasonable to suggest that this is
> > something that *should* be easy to do? if new users simply want to
> > see what a yocto-generated image looks like under q
On Fri, 2 Mar 2012, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> On Friday 02 March 2012 07:16:08 Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > i gathered that. but is it unreasonable to suggest that this is
> > something that *should* be easy to do? if new users simply want to
> > see what a yocto-generated image looks like under q
Hi Zhenhua,
On 03/02/2012 01:59 AM, Luo Zhenhua-B19537 wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Does Yocto support initramfs build?
Can you be more specific about what you are looking for? When you build
an image with the cpio.gz image type, you can boot that as an initramfs
with the following kernel command lin
On 03/01/2012 11:01 PM, tom.zanu...@intel.com wrote:
> From: Tom Zanussi
>
> This patchset implements the 'yocto-bsp' and 'yocto-kernel' BSP tools
> previously described in some detail in this RFC posting:
>
> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto/2011-December/006111.html
>
> With t
On 03/01/2012 11:01 PM, tom.zanu...@intel.com wrote:
> From: Tom Zanussi
>
> BSP template files for all supported Yocto architectures, plus qemu
> versions of the same.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tom Zanussi
> ---
> .../target/arch/arm/conf/machine/{{=machine}}.conf | 87 +
> .../{{ if xserver
Responded privately to Tom on this one...
On 03/01/2012 11:01 PM, tom.zanu...@intel.com wrote:
> From: Tom Zanussi
>
> Create a home for the yocto bsp tools.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tom Zanussi
> ---
> scripts/lib/bsp/__init__.py | 17 +
> 1 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 0 del
>From: yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto-
>boun...@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Koen Kooi
>Sent: Friday, March 02, 2012 2:07 AM
>
>Well, if you use the angstrom setupscript you get 'yocto'. Your phrasing seems
>to suggest you are confusing 'yocto' with 'poky', which is a common mistake
On Fri, 2 Mar 2012, Stewart, David C wrote:
> >From: yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto-
> >boun...@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Koen Kooi
> >Sent: Friday, March 02, 2012 2:07 AM
> >
> >Well, if you use the angstrom setupscript you get 'yocto'. Your phrasing
> >seems
> >to suggest you
On 03/01/2012 11:01 PM, tom.zanu...@intel.com wrote:
> From: Tom Zanussi
>
> The main implementation of the Yocto BSP templating engine,
> essentially containing the internal implementation of the 'yocto-bsp
> create' and yocto-bsp list' commands.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tom Zanussi
> ---
> scrip
On Fri, 2012-03-02 at 08:24 -0800, Darren Hart wrote:
>
> On 03/01/2012 11:01 PM, tom.zanu...@intel.com wrote:
> > From: Tom Zanussi
> >
> > This patchset implements the 'yocto-bsp' and 'yocto-kernel' BSP tools
> > previously described in some detail in this RFC posting:
> >
> > https://lists.y
On 03/01/2012 11:01 PM, tom.zanu...@intel.com wrote:
> From: Tom Zanussi
>
> Yocto BSP kernel-related functions, for interacting with the kernel
> tools and implementing the machinery behind the 'yocto-kernel'
> command.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tom Zanussi
> ---
> scripts/lib/bsp/kernel.py | 679
Op 2 mrt. 2012, om 17:45 heeft Stewart, David C het volgende geschreven:
>> From: yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto-
>> boun...@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Koen Kooi
>> Sent: Friday, March 02, 2012 2:07 AM
>>
>> Well, if you use the angstrom setupscript you get 'yocto'. Your phrasi
On 03/02/2012 09:02 AM, Tom Zanussi wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-03-02 at 08:24 -0800, Darren Hart wrote:
>>> For any subcommand, you can also use the word 'help' just before the
>>> subcommand to get more extensive documentation on the subcommand:
>>>
>>> $ yocto-bsp help create
>>>
>>
>> I believe it
On 03/01/2012 11:01 PM, tom.zanu...@intel.com wrote:
> From: Tom Zanussi
>
> This is essentially 'the documentation' for the Yocto BSP tools, along
> with a few related functions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tom Zanussi
> ---
> scripts/lib/bsp/help.py | 588
> +++
On 03/01/2012 11:01 PM, tom.zanu...@intel.com wrote:
> From: Tom Zanussi
>
> Some constants used by the templating engine.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tom Zanussi
> ---
> scripts/lib/bsp/tags.py | 39 +++
> 1 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> cre
On Fri, 2012-03-02 at 08:35 -0800, Darren Hart wrote:
>
> On 03/01/2012 11:01 PM, tom.zanu...@intel.com wrote:
> > From: Tom Zanussi
> >
> > BSP template files for all supported Yocto architectures, plus qemu
> > versions of the same.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Tom Zanussi
> > ---
> > .../target/
On 03/01/2012 11:01 PM, tom.zanu...@intel.com wrote:
> From: Tom Zanussi
>
> Implementation of the 'yocto-bsp' command-line tool, for creating BSPs
> and listing BSP properties.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tom Zanussi
> ---
> scripts/yocto-bsp | 131
> +++
On Fri, 2012-03-02 at 08:57 -0800, Darren Hart wrote:
>
> On 03/01/2012 11:01 PM, tom.zanu...@intel.com wrote:
> > From: Tom Zanussi
> >
> > The main implementation of the Yocto BSP templating engine,
> > essentially containing the internal implementation of the 'yocto-bsp
> > create' and yocto-
On 03/01/2012 11:01 PM, tom.zanu...@intel.com wrote:
> From: Tom Zanussi
>
> Implementation of the 'yocto-kernel' command-line tool, for modifying
> the kernel portion of a Yocto BSP.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tom Zanussi
> ---
> scripts/yocto-kernel | 219
> ++
On Fri, 2012-03-02 at 09:23 -0800, Darren Hart wrote:
>
> On 03/01/2012 11:01 PM, tom.zanu...@intel.com wrote:
> > From: Tom Zanussi
> >
> > Implementation of the 'yocto-kernel' command-line tool, for modifying
> > the kernel portion of a Yocto BSP.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Tom Zanussi
> > ---
>
i wrote it up because IWFM (it works for me):
http://www.crashcourse.ca/wiki/index.php/Yocto_and_QEMU#Running_pre-built_Yocto_images_in_QEMU
yes, i'm well aware it's a hack but if newcomers want to fire up a
yocto-built image, it seems to do the job. feel free to denigrate and
demean it appro
On Fri, 2012-03-02 at 09:11 -0800, Darren Hart wrote:
>
> On 03/01/2012 11:01 PM, tom.zanu...@intel.com wrote:
> > From: Tom Zanussi
> >
> > Yocto BSP kernel-related functions, for interacting with the kernel
> > tools and implementing the machinery behind the 'yocto-kernel'
> > command.
> >
>
> Can you be more specific about what you are looking for? When you build
> an image with the cpio.gz image type, you can boot that as an initramfs
> with the following kernel command line:
>
> initrd=core-image-minimal-fri2.cpio.gz root=/dev/ram0
>
> If you are looking for something beyond that, p
On 12-03-01 06:58 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
Backport 7 patches bringing pch_uart up to date with required fixes and new
features to support the 4 new patches (from me) enabling the FRI2 serial port.
My patches have been sent to LKML and have received the approval one of the
driver maintainers. They
On 12-03-01 06:59 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
Rather than add these as features in the linux-yocto recipe,
include them in the BSP meta-data directly. Include only the core
EFI bits in the fri2.scc, and add the extended EFI support to the
fri2-standard.scc so that other ktypes don't pull in more than
On 12-03-01 06:59 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
Backport consle support and add the 4 new patches (from me) enabling the FRI2
serial port.
My patches have been sent to LKML and have received the approval one of the
driver maintainers. They are currently pending review and a pull from Greg KH.
Please a
On 12-03-01 06:59 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
From: Darren Hart
Several BSPs duplicated the boot-live fragment in their BSP
specific config. Remove the duplication and add CONFIG_RD_GZIP
and CONFIG_BLK_DEV_SR to the boot-live fragment.
Looks fine to me as well. That's a better place for the common
On 12-03-01 06:59 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
From: Darren Hart
The FRI2 uses the pch_uart driver for the serial console. Enable the console
driver.
It this safe for all eg20t users ? I see the crownbay also
uses this.
Bruce
Signed-off-by: Darren Hart
---
meta/cfg/kernel-cache/features/eg20t/
On 12-03-01 06:59 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
From: Darren Hart
Rather than add these as features in the linux-yocto recipe,
include them in the BSP meta-data directly. Include only the core
EFI bits in the fri2.scc, and add the extended EFI support to the
fri2-standard.scc so that other ktypes don't
On 12-03-01 06:59 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
From: Darren Hart
Move policy features out of fri2.scc and into the fri2-KTYPE.scc files. This
allows KTYPEs like tiny to build smaller kernels while still reusing the
fri2.scc file.
Exactly. Good factoring of the options.
I had one question on the ser
On 12-03-01 04:36 PM, Bodke, Kishore K wrote:
Hi Bruce,
We got the patches from Cedartrail Meego team and applied to Yocto/pvr branch.
Below is the link where we have taken the patches from.
http://build.meego.com/package/files?package=kernel-adaptation-pc&project=MeeGo%3A1.2.0%3ACedarTrail%3
On 03/02/2012 01:16 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> On 12-03-01 06:59 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
>> From: Darren Hart
>>
>> The FRI2 uses the pch_uart driver for the serial console. Enable the console
>> driver.
>
> It this safe for all eg20t users ? I see the crownbay also
> uses this.
It is safe. The
On 02/28/2012 05:28 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
On Tue, 28 Feb 2012, Koen Kooi wrote:
Op 28 feb. 2012, om 22:55 heeft Robert P. J. Day het volgende geschreven:
On Tue, 28 Feb 2012, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
It is true that the beagleboard is a hardware reference board in the
yocto consolidate
On Fri, 2 Mar 2012, William Mills wrote:
... snip ...
> Congratulations you are the first beta tester for the new README.txt
> language :) (patched two days ago).
>
> Denys: I suggest
>
> change:
>
> "Due to the above, it is now recommended to follow the instructions
> at http://www.angstrom-dist
On 03/02/2012 05:33 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
On Fri, 2 Mar 2012, William Mills wrote:
... snip ...
Congratulations you are the first beta tester for the new README.txt
language :) (patched two days ago).
Denys: I suggest
change:
"Due to the above, it is now recommended to follow the in
On 2012-03-02 15:50, William Mills wrote:
On 03/02/2012 05:33 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
On Fri, 2 Mar 2012, William Mills wrote:
... snip ...
Congratulations you are the first beta tester for the new README.txt
language :) (patched two days ago).
Denys: I suggest
change:
"Due to the ab
Hi Joshua,
The error message however does not seem to print the correct problematic path..
but I was able to find the problem using your tips.
Thanks !
Rahul
-Original Message-
From: Joshua Immanuel [mailto:j...@hipro.co.in]
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2012 7:52 PM
To: Saxena, Rahul
Cc:
On 03/02/2012 06:18 PM, Gary Thomas wrote:
On 2012-03-02 15:50, William Mills wrote:
On 03/02/2012 05:33 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
On Fri, 2 Mar 2012, William Mills wrote:
... snip ...
Congratulations you are the first beta tester for the new README.txt
language :) (patched two days ag
44 matches
Mail list logo
