Re: [yocto] qemu boot fail(root-nfs: unknown option: mountprog=21111)

2011-09-08 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 11-09-08 01:49 AM, 蔡振军 wrote: > Hi ALL > > QEMU run well with a pre-build kernel image from yocto site. Now just > change the kernel to one built myself, some error information appeared > about nfs. My kernel image version is 2.6.35 configured by > versatile_defconfig. Error information as f

Re: [yocto] qemu boot fail(root-nfs: unknown option: mountprog=21111)

2011-09-08 Thread Scott Garman
On 09/07/2011 10:49 PM, 蔡振军 wrote: > Hi ALL > > QEMU run well with a pre-build kernel image from yocto site. Now just > change the kernel to one built myself, some error information appeared > about nfs. My kernel image version is 2.6.35 configured by > versatile_defconfig. Error information as

Re: [yocto] qemu boot fail(root-nfs: unknown option: mountprog=21111)

2011-09-08 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 11-09-08 11:09 AM, Scott Garman wrote: > On 09/07/2011 10:49 PM, 蔡振军 wrote: >> Hi ALL >> >> QEMU run well with a pre-build kernel image from yocto site. Now just >> change the kernel to one built myself, some error information appeared >> about nfs. My kernel image version is 2.6.35 configured b

Re: [yocto] Yocto 1.1 Beta Questions

2011-09-08 Thread Darren Hart
On 09/07/2011 05:41 AM, Jason Kridner wrote: > Isn't bitbake supposed to be smart enough to discover and use 'screen' > instead now? It depends on your setting in local.conf TERMCMD = "${SCREEN_TERMCMD}" TERMCMDRUN = "${SCREEN_TERMCMDRUN}" -- Darren > > On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 9:07 PM, Stewart

Re: [yocto] Yocto 1.1 Beta Questions

2011-09-08 Thread Saul Wold
On 09/08/2011 09:20 AM, Darren Hart wrote: On 09/07/2011 05:41 AM, Jason Kridner wrote: Isn't bitbake supposed to be smart enough to discover and use 'screen' instead now? It depends on your setting in local.conf TERMCMD = "${SCREEN_TERMCMD}" TERMCMDRUN = "${SCREEN_TERMCMDRUN}" Actually for

Re: [yocto] Yocto 1.1 Beta Questions

2011-09-08 Thread Darren Hart
On 09/08/2011 09:21 AM, Saul Wold wrote: > On 09/08/2011 09:20 AM, Darren Hart wrote: >> On 09/07/2011 05:41 AM, Jason Kridner wrote: >>> Isn't bitbake supposed to be smart enough to discover and use 'screen' >>> instead now? >> >> It depends on your setting in local.conf >> >> TERMCMD = "${SCREEN_

[yocto] [PATCH 0/2] More fixes for bug 1428

2011-09-08 Thread tom . zanussi
From: Tom Zanussi oe-core commit dc3a8274c7e935fa564eea142d2535c9bcf2b272 for YOCTO #1428 broke meta-intel x86_64 builds: NOTE: Resolving any missing task queue dependencies ERROR: Nothing RPROVIDES 'initramfs-live-install' (but /usr/local/src/yocto/sugarbay/meta/recipes-core/images/core-image-

[yocto] [PATCH 1/2] meta-intel/common: create a grub2 version initramfs-live-install

2011-09-08 Thread tom . zanussi
From: Tom Zanussi x86_64 compatibility was removed from the oe-core initramfs-live-install because it didn't work well with grub 0.97. The meta-intel x86-64 machines still need to use initramfs-live-install so we need an x86_64-compatible recipe. More fixes for [YOCTO #1428]. Signed-off-by: Tom

[yocto] [PATCH 2/2] meta-intel/common: remove initramfs-live-install 1.0 bbappend

2011-09-08 Thread tom . zanussi
From: Tom Zanussi We can no longer use the 1.0 version of initramfs-live-install, so remove the corresponding .bbappend. Signed-off-by: Tom Zanussi --- .../initramfs-live-install_1.0.bbappend|2 -- 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 common/rec

[yocto] [PATCH 0/2] [KERNEL] Cover letter for seperating 10/100 LAN feature from 1G and 10G

2011-09-08 Thread Saxena, Rahul
Cover letter for separating 10/100 LAN feature from 1G and 10G. Typically a machine does not need both of 10/100 and 1G/10G drivers. Signed-off-by: Rahul Saxena Rahul Saxena (2): Remove 10/100 LAN support. 10/100 LAN will be configured by seperate files Added seperate feature for 10/100

[yocto] [PATCH 1/2] [KERNEL] Remove 10/100 LAN support. 10/100 LAN will be configured by separate files

2011-09-08 Thread Saxena, Rahul
Remove 10/100 LAN support. 10/100 LAN will be configured by separate files Signed-off-by: Rahul Saxena --- .../features/intel-e1/intel-e1.cfg |1 - 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta/cfg/kernel-cache/features/intel-e1/intel-e1.cfg b/me

[yocto] [PATCH 2/2] [KERNEL] Add separate feature for 10/100 LAN support

2011-09-08 Thread Saxena, Rahul
Added separate feature for 10/100 LAN support. Signed-off-by: Rahul Saxena --- .../features/intel-e1/intel-e100.cfg |2 ++ .../features/intel-e1/intel-e100.scc |1 + 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) create mode 100644 meta/cfg/kernel-cache/feat

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 0/2] [KERNEL] Cover letter for seperating 10/100 LAN feature from 1G and 10G

2011-09-08 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 11-09-08 06:05 PM, Saxena, Rahul wrote: Cover letter for separating 10/100 LAN feature from 1G and 10G. Typically a machine does not need both of 10/100 and 1G/10G drivers. The change looks fine, and I'd agree that this is a useful split. BUT (there's always a but), there are a set of boards

[yocto] [PATCH 0/3] [KERNEL] Cover letter for seperating 10/100 LAN feature from 1G and 10G

2011-09-08 Thread Saxena, Rahul
Cover letter for separating 10/100 LAN feature from 1G and 10G. Typically a machine does not need both of 10/100 and 1G/10G drivers. Signed-off-by: Rahul saxenarahul.sax...@intel.com Rahul Saxena (3): Remove 10/100 LAN support. 10/100 LAN will be configured by se

[yocto] [PATCH 1/3] [KERNEL] Remove 10/100 LAN support. 10/100 LAN will be configured by separate files

2011-09-08 Thread Saxena, Rahul
Remove 10/100 LAN support. 10/100 LAN will be configured by separate files Signed-off-by: Rahul saxenarahul.sax...@intel.com --- .../features/intel-e1/intel-e1.cfg |1 - 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta/cfg/kern

[yocto] [PATCH 2/3] [KERNEL] Add separate feature for 10/100 LAN support

2011-09-08 Thread Saxena, Rahul
Added separate feature for 10/100 LAN support. Signed-off-by: Rahul Saxenamailto:rahul.sax...@intel.com>> --- .../features/intel-e1/intel-e100.cfg |2 ++ .../features/intel-e1/intel-e100.scc |1 + 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) create mode 1

[yocto] [PATCH 3/3] [KERNEL] Add e100 feature configuration to all boards

2011-09-08 Thread Saxena, Rahul
Added separate feature for 10/100 LAN support. Signed-off-by: Rahul Saxenamailto:rahul.sax...@intel.com>> --- .../kernel-cache/bsp/common-pc-64/common-pc-64.scc |1 + meta/cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/common-pc/common-pc.scc |1 + meta/cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/crownbay/crownbay.scc|1 + met

[yocto] 答复: qemu boot fail(root-nfs: unknown option: mountprog=21111)

2011-09-08 Thread 蔡振军
Hi Bruse,Scott The information you supply is helpful to me. I have known what I need to make QEMU run. Thanks (*^__^*) Feye -邮件原件- 发件人: Bruce Ashfield [mailto:bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com] 发送时间: 2011年9月8日 15:38 收件人: 蔡振军 抄送: yocto@yoctoproject.org 主题: Re: [yocto] qemu boot fail(r