On Aug 3, 2011, at 10:12 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-08-03 at 09:50 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
>> On Aug 3, 2011, at 9:22 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, 2011-08-03 at 09:04 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
Bug submitted:
http://bugzilla.pokylinux.org/show_bug.cgi?id=
Hi Tom,
A few thoughts below. These are all things I can pick up once I return
as well if there is some urgency to get these in tree.
--
Darren
On 08/02/2011 09:05 PM, tom.zanu...@intel.com wrote:
> From: Tom Zanussi
>
> This layer provides support for E6XX + EG20T Intel systems.
>
> Currentl
Require the tune file for x86_64, then TARGET_ARCH is set via the tune
file and TRANSLATED_TARGET_ARCH is set automatically in bitbake.conf.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton
---
meta-sugarbay/conf/machine/sugarbay.conf |5 +++--
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/meta
Require the tune file for x86_64, then TARGET_ARCH is set via the tune
file and TRANSLATED_TARGET_ARCH is set automatically in bitbake.conf.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton
---
meta-jasperforest/conf/machine/jasperforest.conf |5 +++--
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --gi
Two patches to fix "TUNE_ARCH unset" and "PACKAGE_ARCHS variable does not
contain TUNE_PKGARCH" on the autobuilder for sugarbay and jasperforest.
The following changes since commit 567c3b6436b4cb9551c23845c15ab544542b5083:
meta-crownbay: remove obsolete dir (2011-08-03 12:14:39 -0500)
are avai
On Thu, 2011-08-04 at 14:03 +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> Require the tune file for x86_64, then TARGET_ARCH is set via the tune
> file and TRANSLATED_TARGET_ARCH is set automatically in bitbake.conf.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton
> ---
> meta-sugarbay/conf/machine/sugarbay.conf |5 +++--
On Thu, 2011-08-04 at 14:03 +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> Require the tune file for x86_64, then TARGET_ARCH is set via the tune
> file and TRANSLATED_TARGET_ARCH is set automatically in bitbake.conf.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton
> ---
> meta-jasperforest/conf/machine/jasperforest.conf |
Thanks, Paul. I made some similar changes here for both of these last
week, but haven't been able to boot them (getting a kernel oops) so
haven't posted them or checked them in. Once I get past that, I'll be
able to check those in...
Thanks,
Tom
On Thu, 2011-08-04 at 06:03 -0700, Paul Eggleton
On Thursday 04 August 2011 14:29:47 Tom Zanussi wrote:
> Thanks, Paul. I made some similar changes here for both of these last
> week, but haven't been able to boot them (getting a kernel oops) so
> haven't posted them or checked them in. Once I get past that, I'll be
> able to check those in...
Two patches to fix "TUNE_ARCH unset" and "PACKAGE_ARCHS variable does not
contain TUNE_PKGARCH" on the autobuilder for sugarbay and jasperforest.
Since v1, after discussion with Richard remove additional package
architectures that aren't apparently doing anything.
The following changes since comm
Require the tune file for x86_64, then TARGET_ARCH and TARGET_CC_ARCH
are set already. Also remove superfluous "snb" package architecture that
doesn't do anything.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton
---
meta-sugarbay/conf/machine/sugarbay.conf |7 +--
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 6 deleti
Require the tune file for x86_64, then TARGET_ARCH and TARGET_CC_ARCH
are set already. Also remove superfluous "xeon" package architecture
that doesn't do anything.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton
---
meta-jasperforest/conf/machine/jasperforest.conf |7 +--
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+),
On Wed, 2011-08-03 at 23:18 -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> A few thoughts below. These are all things I can pick up once I return
> as well if there is some urgency to get these in tree.
>
Hi Darren,
Thanks for your comments. I've already pulled this in as I didn't think
you'd be gett
Is there any way to make Yocto try to get prebuilt packages from known
repositories rather than trying to rebuild the world?
-Todd
___
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
On Wed, 2011-08-03 at 23:59 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> On Aug 3, 2011, at 10:12 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2011-08-03 at 09:50 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> >> On Aug 3, 2011, at 9:22 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Wed, 2011-08-03 at 09:04 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> Bug s
On Wed, 2011-08-03 at 23:59 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> On Aug 3, 2011, at 10:12 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2011-08-03 at 09:50 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> >> On Aug 3, 2011, at 9:22 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Wed, 2011-08-03 at 09:04 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> Bug s
[Cross posted but please reply on the Yocto list]
We're starting to think about the development focus for post Yocto 1.1
and are collecting ideas on the unscheduled feature list on the wiki:
https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Yocto_Project_Unscheduled_Feature_List
This is an opportunity for peop
On 2011-08-04 08:49, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Wed, 2011-08-03 at 23:59 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Aug 3, 2011, at 10:12 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Wed, 2011-08-03 at 09:50 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Aug 3, 2011, at 9:22 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Wed, 2011-08-03 at 09:04 -0500, Kumar
On Thu, 2011-08-04 at 07:42 -0700, Todd Cooper wrote:
> Is there any way to make Yocto try to get prebuilt packages from known
> repositories rather than trying to rebuild the world?
The system supports a cache of prebuilt objects in the form of the
sstate data to accelerate build times if nothing
On Thursday, August 04, 2011 08:58:59 AM Gary Thomas wrote:
> On 2011-08-04 08:49, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-08-03 at 23:59 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> >> On Aug 3, 2011, at 10:12 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 2011-08-03 at 09:50 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> On Aug 3, 2011,
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 8:06 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Thursday, August 04, 2011 08:58:59 AM Gary Thomas wrote:
>> On 2011-08-04 08:49, Richard Purdie wrote:
>> > On Wed, 2011-08-03 at 23:59 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
>> >> On Aug 3, 2011, at 10:12 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
>> >>> On Wed, 2011-08-03 a
On 2011-08-04 09:29, Chris Larson wrote:
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 8:06 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Thursday, August 04, 2011 08:58:59 AM Gary Thomas wrote:
On 2011-08-04 08:49, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Wed, 2011-08-03 at 23:59 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Aug 3, 2011, at 10:12 AM, Richard Purdie wro
On Thu, 2011-08-04 at 07:04 -0700, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> Two patches to fix "TUNE_ARCH unset" and "PACKAGE_ARCHS variable does not
> contain TUNE_PKGARCH" on the autobuilder for sugarbay and jasperforest.
>
> Since v1, after discussion with Richard remove additional package
> architectures that a
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 10:34 AM, Gary Thomas wrote:
> How do I use this?
There seems to be a blurb here:
https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Enable_sstate_cache
-M
___
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yo
From: Tom Zanussi
Most of the time, we want a -live image, so add it to the
IMAGE_FSTYPES by default.
Signed-off-by: Tom Zanussi
---
meta-jasperforest/conf/machine/jasperforest.conf |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/meta-jasperforest/conf/machine/jasperf
From: Tom Zanussi
A couple updates for meta-sugarbay and meta-jasperforest dealing with
the new live image changes.
Boot tested successfully with the jasperforest live minimal image.
The following changes since commit c5f2339533ec9daf14e00db67fa75ed89bbdda13:
Paul Eggleton (1):
meta-j
From: Tom Zanussi
Most of the time, we want a -live image, so add it to the
IMAGE_FSTYPES by default.
Signed-off-by: Tom Zanussi
---
meta-sugarbay/conf/machine/sugarbay.conf |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/meta-sugarbay/conf/machine/sugarbay.conf
b/me
On Wed, 2011-08-03 at 20:21 -0700, Tim Bird wrote:
> On 8/3/2011 5:50 PM, Joshua Lock wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-08-03 at 17:40 -0700, Joshua Lock wrote:
> >> On Wed, 2011-08-03 at 17:08 -0700, Tim Bird wrote:
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> I'm not sure where to report this, but I tried again to build
> >>
Would this be worth putting on the list of items wished for in the future?
It sounds like the problem is difficult, but not impossible.
>
>From: Richard Purdie
>To: Todd Cooper
>Cc: "yocto@yoctoproject.org"
>Sent: Thursday, August 4, 2011 10:59 AM
>Subject:
On 08/03/2011 06:44 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Wednesday, August 03, 2011 05:08:43 PM Tim Bird wrote:
>> | from cairo-scaled-font-private.h:45,
>> | from cairoint.h:380,
>> |
>> | from cairo-arc.c:37:
>> | cairo-mutex-impl-private.h:262:3: error: #er
On Thu, 2011-08-04 at 15:54 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
> [Cross posted but please reply on the Yocto list]
>
> We're starting to think about the development focus for post Yocto 1.1
> and are collecting ideas on the unscheduled feature list on the wiki:
>
> https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Yo
On Thu, 2011-08-04 at 11:51 -0700, Tim Bird wrote:
> The only thing that looks suspicious to me is:
>
> ERROR: ld.so: object 'libpseudo.so' from LD_PRELOAD cannot be preloaded:
> ignored.
This is concerning and may cause problems later on. One possible factor
here is SELINUX. Do you have that en
On 2011-08-04 09:06, Khem Raj wrote:
On Thursday, August 04, 2011 08:58:59 AM Gary Thomas wrote:
On 2011-08-04 08:49, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Wed, 2011-08-03 at 23:59 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Aug 3, 2011, at 10:12 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Wed, 2011-08-03 at 09:50 -0500, Kumar Gala wro
On Thu, 2011-08-04 at 12:45 -0700, Joshua Lock wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-08-04 at 15:54 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > [Cross posted but please reply on the Yocto list]
> >
> > We're starting to think about the development focus for post Yocto 1.1
> > and are collecting ideas on the unscheduled feat
On Thu, 2011-08-04 at 10:50 -0700, Todd Cooper wrote:
> Would this be worth putting on the list of items wished for in the
> future?
>
> It sounds like the problem is difficult, but not impossible.
Most things are possible :).
The implementation isn't hard, maintaining some kind of translation
On 08/04/2011 12:45 PM, Joshua Lock wrote:
On Thu, 2011-08-04 at 15:54 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
[Cross posted but please reply on the Yocto list]
We're starting to think about the development focus for post Yocto 1.1
and are collecting ideas on the unscheduled feature list on the wiki:
htt
On 08/04/2011 01:22 PM, Joshua Lock wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-08-04 at 11:51 -0700, Tim Bird wrote:
>> The only thing that looks suspicious to me is:
>>
>> ERROR: ld.so: object 'libpseudo.so' from LD_PRELOAD cannot be preloaded:
>> ignored.
>
> This is concerning and may cause problems later on. One
>> http://bugzilla.pokylinux.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1323
>>
>> My question still stands even w/o it being in formal docs.
>
> FWIW, POKYMODE was replaced by TCMODE as part of the OE-Core changes.
> I'd be interested to know where we've missed the references to it and
> ge
Can I suggest that Yocto put it on the futures list, but with a lower priority?
>
>From: Richard Purdie
>To: Todd Cooper
>Cc: "yocto@yoctoproject.org"
>Sent: Thursday, August 4, 2011 6:43 PM
>Subject: Re: [yocto] prebuilt pacakages
>
>On Thu, 2011-08-04 at 10:
From: Jingdong Lu
Add pandaboard bsp
Jingdong Lu (1):
pandaboard: add pandaboard bsp
.../bsp/pandaboard/pandaboard-non_hardware.cfg | 30 ++
.../bsp/pandaboard/pandaboard-standard.scc |7 +
.../cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/pandaboard/pandaboard.cfg | 346
.../
From: Jingdong Lu
add pandaboard bsp configuration.
Signed-off-by: Jingdong Lu
---
.../bsp/pandaboard/pandaboard-non_hardware.cfg | 30 ++
.../bsp/pandaboard/pandaboard-standard.scc |7 +
.../cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/pandaboard/pandaboard.cfg | 346
.../cfg/
41 matches
Mail list logo
