[yocto] [PATCH 0/1] Add emenlow pieces removed from oe-core

2011-05-06 Thread Paul Eggleton
From: Paul Eggleton This adds back the emenlow-specific pieces recently removed from oe-core. Thanks, Paul Eggleton --- Paul Eggleton (1): Add emenlow pieces removed from oe-core .../recipes-core/tasks/task-core-tools.bbappend|2 ++ .../tasks/task-poky-sdk-gmae.bbappend

[yocto] [PATCH 1/1] Add emenlow pieces removed from oe-core

2011-05-06 Thread Paul Eggleton
From: Paul Eggleton Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton --- .../recipes-core/tasks/task-core-tools.bbappend|2 ++ .../tasks/task-poky-sdk-gmae.bbappend |1 + .../task-poky-standalone-gmae-sdk-target.bbappend |1 + .../clutter/clutter-1.4_1.4.2.bbappend |4

[yocto] [PATCH 0/1] linux-yocto: move non-core machines to meta-yocto

2011-05-06 Thread Bruce Ashfield
The machine configuration of the non-core (non-qemu) machines has moved to meta-yocto. Moving the branch mappings, compatibility and SRCREVs of these machines to meta-yocto should also be done. Anyone using meta-yocto to build these machines will see no impact from this change. Acked-by: Darren H

[yocto] [PATCH 1/1] linux-yocto: move non-core machines to meta-yocto

2011-05-06 Thread Bruce Ashfield
The machine configuration of the non-core (non-qemu) machines has moved to meta-yocto. Moving the branch mappings, compatibility and SRCREVs of these machines to meta-yocto should also be done. Anyone using meta-yocto to build these machines will see no impact from this change. Signed-off-by: Bru

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 0/1] Add emenlow pieces removed from oe-core

2011-05-06 Thread Tom Zanussi
On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 05:45 -0700, Paul Eggleton wrote: > From: Paul Eggleton > > This adds back the emenlow-specific pieces recently removed from oe-core. > > Thanks, > Paul Eggleton Acked-by: Tom Zanussi Pulled into meta-intel/master. Thanks, Paul! > --- > > > Paul Eggleton (1): >

[yocto] Results of latest documentation audit, May 2011

2011-05-06 Thread Scott Garman
Hello, As a data point for where we stand in ensuring our packages are producing documentation, I have some scripts which build all recipes (using the output of bitbake -s, not world), and then check that a -doc package is generated which is populated with files. A summary of the results usi

Re: [yocto] Results of latest documentation audit, May 2011

2011-05-06 Thread Darren Hart
On 05/06/2011 01:29 PM, Scott Garman wrote: > Hello, > > As a data point for where we stand in ensuring our packages are > producing documentation, I have some scripts which build all recipes > (using the output of bitbake -s, not world), and then check that a -doc > package is generated which

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 1/1] linux-yocto: move non-core machines to meta-yocto

2011-05-06 Thread Saul Wold
On 05/06/2011 11:44 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: The machine configuration of the non-core (non-qemu) machines has moved to meta-yocto. Moving the branch mappings, compatibility and SRCREVs of these machines to meta-yocto should also be done. Anyone using meta-yocto to build these machines will see

Re: [yocto] Results of latest documentation audit, May 2011

2011-05-06 Thread Scott Garman
On 05/06/2011 02:36 PM, Darren Hart wrote: On 05/06/2011 01:29 PM, Scott Garman wrote: Hello, As a data point for where we stand in ensuring our packages are producing documentation, I have some scripts which build all recipes (using the output of bitbake -s, not world), and then check that a -

Re: [yocto] [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] linux-yocto: move non-core machines to meta-yocto

2011-05-06 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 6:26 PM, Saul Wold wrote: > On 05/06/2011 11:44 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: >> >> The machine configuration of the non-core (non-qemu) machines >> has moved to meta-yocto. Moving the branch mappings, compatibility >> and SRCREVs of these machines to meta-yocto should also be >