Will do, thanks!
On Sat, Jun 1, 2019, 3:50 PM Mark Hatle, wrote:
> Thanks, this shows that the prelinking is still working in this case.
> I'll get
> you patch queued up. If you don't see any progress on it this coming week,
> please feel free to remind me.
>
> --Mark
>
> On 5/29/19 1:42 PM, Sh
Thanks, this shows that the prelinking is still working in this case. I'll get
you patch queued up. If you don't see any progress on it this coming week,
please feel free to remind me.
--Mark
On 5/29/19 1:42 PM, Shane Peelar wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> Thank you for your reply and no problem -- I ch
Hi Mark,
Thank you for your reply and no problem -- I chose to benchmark ssh-add
with it. It contains no `.plt`.
The results are as follows:
Without prelink (ran prelink -auv):
26019:
26019: runtime linker statistics:
26019: total startup time in dynamic loader: 132167
Sorry for my delayed reply. I was out on a business trip.
Did you try this with the ld.so statistics to see if the relocations were indeed
reduced at runtime?
One of my worries with these changes (since I am not an ELF expert either) is
that we make a change that doesn't actually do anything --
Patch is attached. Thank you!
On Sat, May 25, 2019 at 2:30 AM Khem Raj wrote:
> On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 6:58 PM Shane Peelar
> wrote:
> >
> > Great! Would you be willing to accept a patch that makes arch-x86_64.c
> handle that condition like the other arches?
> >
>
> yes certainly.
>
> > -Sha
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 6:58 PM Shane Peelar wrote:
>
> Great! Would you be willing to accept a patch that makes arch-x86_64.c
> handle that condition like the other arches?
>
yes certainly.
> -Shane
>
> On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 12:27 PM Khem Raj wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 5/24/19 8:10 AM, Shane Pe
Great! Would you be willing to accept a patch that makes arch-x86_64.c
handle that condition like the other arches?
-Shane
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 12:27 PM Khem Raj wrote:
>
>
> On 5/24/19 8:10 AM, Shane Peelar wrote:
> > I did some reading into the sources in other architectures. The closest
On 5/24/19 8:10 AM, Shane Peelar wrote:
I did some reading into the sources in other architectures. The closest
match, arch_i386.c, makes the write conditional as you say.
So do other arches, including |arch_arm.c, |arch_sh.c, |arch-mips.c,
|arch-s390.c, |arch-s390x.c, and |arch-ia64.c.||
I did some reading into the sources in other architectures. The closest
match, arch_i386.c, makes the write conditional as you say.
So do other arches, including arch_arm.c, arch_sh.c, arch-mips.c, arch-s390.c,
arch-s390x.c, and arch-ia64.c.
Notably, arch-cris.c has the same assert as arch-x86_64
On 5/23/19 7:53 PM, Shane Peelar wrote:
Any of them on the system pretty much, and yes they are also built with
-fno-plt.
OK, I think its better to them conditionally check for .plt section,
can you describe more of whats going on when sections are checked.
On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 9:59 PM
Any of them on the system pretty much, and yes they are also built with
-fno-plt.
On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 9:59 PM Khem Raj wrote:
>
>
> On 5/23/19 8:05 AM, Shane Peelar wrote:
> > Hi Everyone @ the Yocto project,
> >
> > I'm Shane Peelar, a PhD Candidate at the University of Windsor.
> > I'm wri
On 5/23/19 8:05 AM, Shane Peelar wrote:
Hi Everyone @ the Yocto project,
I'm Shane Peelar, a PhD Candidate at the University of Windsor.
I'm writing to you about prelink-cross, as part of the Yocto project.
Specifically, I'm looking at using it with executables built using
`-fno-plt` under GC
12 matches
Mail list logo
