>Not really my call to make. Also, please keep this discussion on the
>mailing list so that everyone benefits.
Sorry forgot to hit the reply all. Thanks for the suggestion I am now
waiting input from the rest of the community regarding the
applicability of rename command.
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at
On 2017-04-12 09:15, Paulo Neves wrote:
Hello Gary.
I didn't know it was not a coreutil. To do it in another way i think
this simple code will grow. Before refactoring could I have other
opinions?
We have a very limited environment and even so the rename exists. It
is part of the util-linux-ng
On 2017-04-12 09:02, Paulo Neves wrote:
I expect it to rename all the .conf.sample files from .conf.sample to
.conf. Give it a try ;)
This introduces a new dependency for the rename tool/program which is
a Perl script. It seems to me that much effort has been made recently
to minimize these sc
I expect it to rename all the .conf.sample files from .conf.sample to
.conf. Give it a try ;)
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 8:54 AM, Gary Thomas wrote:
> On 2017-04-12 08:48, Paulo Neves wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I thought it would be consistent to have the multiconfig samples to
>> also be populated j
On 2017-04-12 08:48, Paulo Neves wrote:
Hello,
I thought it would be consistent to have the multiconfig samples to
also be populated just like the local.conf.
I produced a patch accordingly:
From 6091978f666463c46093203b74f28b82a9bf4d47 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paulo Neves
Date: Mon,
