Dear Paul,
In message <3038126.PEqOPPdATB@helios> you wrote:
>
> > if you're on an allegedly supported distro, and you do an upgrade,
> > it's entirely possible that one of those bits of software gets
> > upgraded in a way that breaks OE/yocto, and by using ASSUME_PROVIDED,
> > you'll automatica
On Fri, 23 Nov 2012, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> Well, we don't test with any other value of ASSUME_PROVIDED. If you
> add tools to ASSUME_PROVIDED that we would have otherwise built so
> that the host tools are used, we haven't tested the build with those
> host tools. Equally if you remove items from
On Friday 23 November 2012 09:31:39 Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Nov 2012, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> > On Thursday 22 November 2012 06:54:33 Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > > first, is ASSUME_PROVIDED technically completely superfluous?
> > >
> > > it's clearly meant to speed up processing, but
On Thu, 22 Nov 2012, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> On Thursday 22 November 2012 06:54:33 Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > first, is ASSUME_PROVIDED technically completely superfluous?
> > it's clearly meant to speed up processing, but could one (if one
> > wanted) unset it and have the processing still wor
On Thursday 22 November 2012 06:54:33 Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Nov 2012, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> > On Wednesday 21 November 2012 20:19:05 Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > > On Wed, 21 Nov 2012, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> > > > On Wednesday 21 November 2012 17:23:56 Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > > >
On Thu, 22 Nov 2012, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> On Wednesday 21 November 2012 20:19:05 Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > On Wed, 21 Nov 2012, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 21 November 2012 17:23:56 Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > > > as i read it, the sanity.bbclass and ASSUME_PROVIDED will
> > > > di
On Wednesday 21 November 2012 20:19:05 Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Nov 2012, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> > On Wednesday 21 November 2012 17:23:56 Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > > as i read it, the sanity.bbclass and ASSUME_PROVIDED will
> > > dictate what needs to be there and what will be used if
On Wed, 21 Nov 2012, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> On Wednesday 21 November 2012 17:23:56 Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > i've noticed there are various web pages purporting to explain how
> > to set up a proper OE/yocto development host, but they give what is
> > pretty clearly contradictory information.
Robert P. J. Day
> >Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org
> >Subject: Re: [yocto] inconsistent pages out there for setting up your
> >yocto dev host
> >
> >On Wednesday 21 November 2012 17:23:56 Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> >> i've noticed there are various web pages purport
>-Original Message-
>From: yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto-
>boun...@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Paul Eggleton
>Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 2:51 PM
>To: Robert P. J. Day
>Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org
>Subject: Re: [yocto] inconsistent pages out
On Wednesday 21 November 2012 17:23:56 Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> i've noticed there are various web pages purporting to explain how
> to set up a proper OE/yocto development host, but they give what is
> pretty clearly contradictory information.
>
> as one example, there's this page on getting
11 matches
Mail list logo
