Re: [yocto] Yocto Project support for Numeric/Scientific Python

2019-04-11 Thread Mike Looijmans
Just attempting to revive this dead horse again... Anyone made any proress here? Since cross-compiling turned out to be really really painful, I tried if compiling on the board would be an option. No such luck, apparently the Fortran compiler isn't being crosscompiled either. On 26-01-19 20:0

Re: [yocto] Yocto Project support for Numeric/Scientific Python

2019-01-26 Thread Philip Balister
Sounds like we need a layer for packages that needs fortran enabled and collect out work there. Philip On 01/24/2019 05:31 AM, Mike Looijmans wrote: > +1 > > Got lapack to compile, but no such luck with any "blas" package (like > openblas). And that's a requirement for octave, which was what I

Re: [yocto] Yocto Project support for Numeric/Scientific Python

2019-01-24 Thread Mike Looijmans
+1 Got lapack to compile, but no such luck with any "blas" package (like openblas). And that's a requirement for octave, which was what I was aiming at. I'll share some recipes, tomorrow or so (today is stuffed with other work). On 23-01-19 22:39, Philip Balister wrote: > I care :) > > On 01/

Re: [yocto] Yocto Project support for Numeric/Scientific Python

2019-01-23 Thread Smith, Virgil (US)
Discussing only the question of making a SciPy recipe today: > > Is there a current or relatively recent recipe for SciPy and related > > libraries? > > People have worked on it at least once before but found some problems with > blas and atlas: > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto/2

Re: [yocto] Yocto Project support for Numeric/Scientific Python

2019-01-23 Thread Randy MacLeod
On 1/23/19 4:28 PM, Randy MacLeod wrote: It a reasonable list for general discussion. If you get to a point where patches are being submitted, it should probably go to another list such as: oops... such as the meta-openembedded list: openembedded-de...@lists.openembedded.org or whatever list t

Re: [yocto] Yocto Project support for Numeric/Scientific Python

2019-01-23 Thread Philip Balister
I care :) On 01/23/2019 04:28 PM, Randy MacLeod wrote: > On 1/23/19 2:54 PM, Smith, Virgil (US) wrote: >> Is there a current or relatively recent recipe for SciPy and related >> libraries? > > People have worked on it at least once before but found some problems > with blas and atlas: > > https:

Re: [yocto] Yocto Project support for Numeric/Scientific Python

2019-01-23 Thread Randy MacLeod
On 1/23/19 2:54 PM, Smith, Virgil (US) wrote: Is there a current or relatively recent recipe for SciPy and related libraries? People have worked on it at least once before but found some problems with blas and atlas: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto/2018-March/thread.html#40348