Re: [yocto] Meta layer for pine64

2016-09-23 Thread Mont3z Claros
Hi all, On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 12:55 PM, Mont3z Claros wrote: > On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 10:21 AM, Khem Raj wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 8:29 AM, Tom Rini wrote: >>> On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 11:39:48AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 2:01 PM, Mont3z Claros wrote:

Re: [yocto] Meta layer for pine64

2016-09-22 Thread Mont3z Claros
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 10:21 AM, Khem Raj wrote: > On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 8:29 AM, Tom Rini wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 11:39:48AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: >>> On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 2:01 PM, Mont3z Claros >>> wrote: >>> > Hi all, >>> > >>> > I just finished a first beta version of a met

Re: [yocto] Meta layer for pine64

2016-09-22 Thread Khem Raj
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 8:29 AM, Tom Rini wrote: > On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 11:39:48AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 2:01 PM, Mont3z Claros >> wrote: >> > Hi all, >> > >> > I just finished a first beta version of a meta layer for SBC pine64. >> > You can find it in https://gi

Re: [yocto] Meta layer for pine64

2016-09-22 Thread Tom Rini
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 11:39:48AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 2:01 PM, Mont3z Claros > wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I just finished a first beta version of a meta layer for SBC pine64. > > You can find it in https://github.com/mont3z/meta-pine64 > > > > I'd appreciate if anyo

Re: [yocto] Meta layer for pine64

2016-09-21 Thread Khem Raj
On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 2:01 PM, Mont3z Claros wrote: > Hi all, > > I just finished a first beta version of a meta layer for SBC pine64. > You can find it in https://github.com/mont3z/meta-pine64 > > I'd appreciate if anyone has any comments on possible improvements. A > major problem I had was t

Re: [yocto] Meta layer for pine64

2016-09-20 Thread Paul Eggleton
Hi Montez, On Fri, 16 Sep 2016 14:01:41 Mont3z Claros wrote: > I just finished a first beta version of a meta layer for SBC pine64. > You can find it in https://github.com/mont3z/meta-pine64 > > I'd appreciate if anyone has any comments on possible improvements. A > major problem I had was the n