On 2015-02-02 08:33, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Mon, 2015-02-02 at 08:32 -0700, Gary Thomas wrote:
On 2015-02-02 08:28, Moore, Thomas (FtWorth) wrote:
Gary,
It seems like COMPATIBLE_MACHINE would have values such as
genericx86, qemux86-64, or beaglebone. If that's true, I don't think I
want to
On Mon, 2015-02-02 at 08:32 -0700, Gary Thomas wrote:
> On 2015-02-02 08:28, Moore, Thomas (FtWorth) wrote:
> > Gary,
> >
> > It seems like COMPATIBLE_MACHINE would have values such as
> genericx86, qemux86-64, or beaglebone. If that's true, I don't think I
> want to use COMPATIBLE_MACHINE as my re
ehalf Of Gary Thomas
Sent: Monday, February 02, 2015 9:23 AM
To: yocto@yoctoproject.org
Subject: Re: [yocto] COMPATIBLE_HOST
On 2015-02-02 08:17, Moore, Thomas (FtWorth) wrote:
I have a binary recipe that is only compatible with x86 and x86_64 systems. I
*think* specifying the COMPATIBLE_HOST in
@yoctoproject.org
Subject: Re: [yocto] COMPATIBLE_HOST
Hi Thomas,
On 2 February 2015 at 15:17, Moore, Thomas (FtWorth)
mailto:thomas.moo...@atk.com>> wrote:
I have a binary recipe that is only compatible with x86 and x86_64 systems. I
*think* specifying the COMPATIBLE_HOST in my recipe would be
yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org] On
Behalf Of Gary Thomas
Sent: Monday, February 02, 2015 9:23 AM
To: yocto@yoctoproject.org
Subject: Re: [yocto] COMPATIBLE_HOST
On 2015-02-02 08:17, Moore, Thomas (FtWorth) wrote:
> I have a binary recipe that is only compatible with x
On 2015-02-02 08:17, Moore, Thomas (FtWorth) wrote:
I have a binary recipe that is only compatible with x86 and x86_64 systems. I
*think* specifying the COMPATIBLE_HOST in my recipe would be a good idea.
However, I've been unable to find any documentation, or even a good
description, of this v
Hi Thomas,
On 2 February 2015 at 15:17, Moore, Thomas (FtWorth)
wrote:
> I have a binary recipe that is only compatible with x86 and x86_64
> systems. I *think* specifying the COMPATIBLE_HOST in my recipe would be a
> good idea. However, I've been unable to find any documentation, or even a
> go
On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 14:46 +0800, Xu, Dongxiao wrote:
> I saw in initramfs-live-install_1.0.bb recipe, there is a line to set
> the COMPATIBLE_HOST:
>
> COMPATIBLE_HOST = "(i.86|x86_64).*-linux"
>
> But actually initramfs-live-install is set as dependency in
> core-image-minimal-initramfs.bb. Th
