On 3 November 2016 at 09:57, Mike Looijmans wrote:
> Would it be safe to store the sstate-cache for a bunch of builds into a
> single directory, with builds running in parallel contributing to that?
>
> Each build would be using a different set of layers, different machines,
> and building differ
On 02-11-16 15:17, Burton, Ross wrote:
On 2 November 2016 at 13:36, Chris Z. mailto:winotu.em...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Is it secure to use in parallel sstate-cache for building images for
different target machines ?
Short answer: yes.
The hashes will be different so there's no risk of c
On 2 November 2016 at 13:36, Chris Z. wrote:
> Is it secure to use in parallel sstate-cache for building images for
> different target machines ?
>
Short answer: yes.
The hashes will be different so there's no risk of conflicting files for
the target, so it's only native recipes that may confli