On 11-12-13 6:43 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
On 12/13/2011 03:41 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 11-12-13 6:33 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
We currently build at least some MACHINES with 2.6.37 of
linux-libc-headers. This can cause problems for newer packages (such as
connman) that expect more recent heade
On 12/13/2011 03:41 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> On 11-12-13 6:33 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
>> We currently build at least some MACHINES with 2.6.37 of
>> linux-libc-headers. This can cause problems for newer packages (such as
>> connman) that expect more recent headers (if_alg.h is missing prior to
On 11-12-13 6:33 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
We currently build at least some MACHINES with 2.6.37 of
linux-libc-headers. This can cause problems for newer packages (such as
connman) that expect more recent headers (if_alg.h is missing prior to
2.6.39). While the proper fix is to ensure these packages
We currently build at least some MACHINES with 2.6.37 of
linux-libc-headers. This can cause problems for newer packages (such as
connman) that expect more recent headers (if_alg.h is missing prior to
2.6.39). While the proper fix is to ensure these packages can cope with
older headers, for MACHINES
