On 8 February 2016 at 17:36, Burton, Ross wrote:
> So I had a quick look at this. The fifo certainly ends up in the
> resulting ipk at least, but as you say package_qa hangs. It's probably
> encountering a non-file and breaking somewhere. A really nasty workaround
> until this is fixed would b
On 8 February 2016 at 16:39, Baumann, Michael
wrote:
> Switching to rpm package showed the same behavior.
>
> Is there another workaround than a post install script?
>
>
So I had a quick look at this. The fifo certainly ends up in the resulting
ipk at least, but as you say package_qa hangs. It'
: [yocto] how to create a named_pipe in my image
On 8 February 2016 at 16:12, Baumann, Michael
mailto:michael.baum...@vector.com>> wrote:
Possibly it's because named pipes cannot be packed into an archive? If yes, how
can I circumvent this?
It would be interesting to see what happens if
On 8 February 2016 at 16:12, Baumann, Michael
wrote:
> Possibly it's because named pipes cannot be packed into an archive? If
> yes, how can I circumvent this?
>
It would be interesting to see what happens if you change PACKAGE_CLASSES
to use rpm instead of ipkg. One workaround would be to crea
can I circumvent this?
Regards
Michael
>-Original Message-
>From: yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto-
>boun...@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Baumann, Michael
>Sent: Monday, February 08, 2016 4:07 PM
>To: yocto@yoctoproject.org
>Subject: [yocto] how to create a
Hi,
I try to create a named pipe (fifo) for my target filesystem.
I tried it in my .bb file in the do_install() section with "mkfifo
"
Any ideas gratefully received.
Regards
Michael
--
___
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoc
