On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 12:17 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 12:16 PM Khem Raj wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 11:53 AM Chris Elledge
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Unfortunately, removing the "+1" doesn't work. That results in a kernel
>>> which claims to start, but doesn't progress.
>>>
>>> C
If I have neither the +1 nor the ORR then the kernel boot does this:
Loading file '/boot/gateway3.dtb' to addr 0x2100 with size 28500
(0x6f54)...
Done
Loading file '/boot/zImage' to addr 0x2200 with size 3182128
(0x00308e30)...
Done
Kernel image @ 0x2200 [ 0x00 - 0x308e30 ]
##
On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 12:16 PM Khem Raj wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 11:53 AM Chris Elledge
> wrote:
>
>> Unfortunately, removing the "+1" doesn't work. That results in a kernel
>> which claims to start, but doesn't progress.
>>
>> Changing it to an "|1" also doesn't work due to this error:
On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 11:53 AM Chris Elledge
wrote:
> Unfortunately, removing the "+1" doesn't work. That results in a kernel
> which claims to start, but doesn't progress.
>
> Changing it to an "|1" also doesn't work due to this error:
> arch/arm/kernel/entry-common.S:117: Error: invalid operan
Unfortunately, removing the "+1" doesn't work. That results in a kernel
which claims to start, but doesn't progress.
Changing it to an "|1" also doesn't work due to this error:
arch/arm/kernel/entry-common.S:117: Error: invalid operands (.text and
*ABS* sections) for `|'
Doing this to the badr ma
On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 4:14 PM, Andre McCurdy wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 1:15 PM, Chris Elledge
> wrote:
>> I recently upgraded my Yocto based project to Yocto 2.4.2, and I encountered
>> a problem when building my custom kernel for an AT91 SAMA5D3X platform. I've
>> been using an ARM Thumb2
On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 9:14 AM, Andre McCurdy wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 8:06 AM, Chris Elledge
> wrote:
>> Thanks for the feedback. I rolled back binutils to 2.28.0 by copying the
>> yocto-2.3.3 binutils recipe directory into my custom layer. That has
>> resolved the issue.
>>
>> I can conf
On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 8:06 AM, Chris Elledge
wrote:
> Thanks for the feedback. I rolled back binutils to 2.28.0 by copying the
> yocto-2.3.3 binutils recipe directory into my custom layer. That has
> resolved the issue.
>
> I can confirm that binutils 2.29.0 also has the problem. I went from
> yo
Thanks for the feedback. I rolled back binutils to 2.28.0 by copying the
yocto-2.3.3 binutils recipe directory into my custom layer. That has
resolved the issue.
I can confirm that binutils 2.29.0 also has the problem. I went from
yocto-2.3 to 2.4.2 so I hadn't tried binutils 2.29.0 previously. Th
On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 3:49 PM, akuster808 wrote:
> On 04/02/2018 01:15 PM, Chris Elledge wrote:
>
> I recently upgraded my Yocto based project to Yocto 2.4.2, and I encountered
> a problem when building my custom kernel for an AT91 SAMA5D3X platform. I've
> been using an ARM Thumb2 kernel for a w
On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 1:15 PM, Chris Elledge
wrote:
> I recently upgraded my Yocto based project to Yocto 2.4.2, and I encountered
> a problem when building my custom kernel for an AT91 SAMA5D3X platform. I've
> been using an ARM Thumb2 kernel for a while successfully until this release.
> It app
On 04/02/2018 01:15 PM, Chris Elledge wrote:
> I recently upgraded my Yocto based project to Yocto 2.4.2, and I
> encountered a problem when building my custom kernel for an AT91
> SAMA5D3X platform. I've been using an ARM Thumb2 kernel for a while
> successfully until this release. It appears th
I recently upgraded my Yocto based project to Yocto 2.4.2, and I
encountered a problem when building my custom kernel for an AT91 SAMA5D3X
platform. I've been using an ARM Thumb2 kernel for a while successfully
until this release. It appears that the issue stems from the change to
binutils version
13 matches
Mail list logo
