-Original Message-
From: yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org] On
Behalf Of Christian Gagneraud
Sent: Friday, October 11, 2013 05:08
To: yocto@yoctoproject.org
Subject: Re: [yocto] Yocto Project 1.5_M5.rc6
On 11/10/13 14:55, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>
On 11/10/13 14:55, Otavio Salvador wrote:
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 10:45 PM, Saul Wold wrote:
Sorry for the top post here. The real reason we still have Qt3 is because
it's required part of the LSB spec. OE-Core contains Qt4 and we know that
meta-qt5 exists from Otavio and Martin.
I know that
On 11/10/13 14:45, Saul Wold wrote:
Sorry for the top post here. The real reason we still have Qt3 is
because it's required part of the LSB spec. OE-Core contains Qt4 and we
know that meta-qt5 exists from Otavio and Martin.
Thanks for the explanation.
I know that Richard and Paul have been
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 10:45 PM, Saul Wold wrote:
>
> Sorry for the top post here. The real reason we still have Qt3 is because
> it's required part of the LSB spec. OE-Core contains Qt4 and we know that
> meta-qt5 exists from Otavio and Martin.
>
> I know that Richard and Paul have been watchin
Sorry for the top post here. The real reason we still have Qt3 is
because it's required part of the LSB spec. OE-Core contains Qt4 and we
know that meta-qt5 exists from Otavio and Martin.
I know that Richard and Paul have been watching what's going on with
meta-qt5.
Sau!
On 10/10/2013 05
Game, set, and match! This is also why I don't play golf!
There are many layers I would love to see in the YP QA process and I
would count meta-qt5 in the top priority. However, we only have so
many resources, so we have to focus on the core right now. I'd be
happy to talk offline about finding w
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 7:26 PM, Christian Gagneraud wrote:
> On 11/10/13 11:02, Jeff Osier-Mixon wrote:
>>
>> Hi Chris - well-intended sarcasm isn't usually a problem, but I want
>> to make sure to address your concerns here. We would like to see a
>> meta-qt5 as well but so far one has not been
On 11/10/13 11:02, Jeff Osier-Mixon wrote:
Hi Chris - well-intended sarcasm isn't usually a problem, but I want
to make sure to address your concerns here. We would like to see a
meta-qt5 as well but so far one has not been submitted. If you would
like to submit one, I would be happy to put you i
Hi Chris - well-intended sarcasm isn't usually a problem, but I want
to make sure to address your concerns here. We would like to see a
meta-qt5 as well but so far one has not been submitted. If you would
like to submit one, I would be happy to put you in touch with the
right maintainers who can gu
On 09/10/13 11:35, Flanagan, Elizabeth wrote:
All,
The final release candidate for the upcoming Yocto Project 1.5 (dora 10.0.0)
release is now available for testing at:
http://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/pub/releases/1.5_M5.rc6
poky 102bf5e0f640fe85068452a42b85077f1c81e0c9
eclipse-poky-juno 2
All,
The final release candidate for the upcoming Yocto Project 1.5 (dora 10.0.0)
release is now available for testing at:
http://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/pub/releases/1.5_M5.rc6
poky 102bf5e0f640fe85068452a42b85077f1c81e0c9
eclipse-poky-juno 2fa1c58940141a3c547c8790b8a6832167e8eb66
eclipse-
11 matches
Mail list logo