On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 11:16 AM, Paul Eggleton
wrote:
> On Tuesday 06 December 2011 15:59:39 McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 9:43 AM, Paul Eggleton
>> wrote:
>> > We had some discussions [1] [2] about this last cycle but I don't feel
>> > we
>> > reached a proper concl
On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 11:16 -0600, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> On Tuesday 06 December 2011 15:59:39 McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 9:43 AM, Paul Eggleton
> > wrote:
> > > We had some discussions [1] [2] about this last cycle but I don't feel
> > > we
> > > reached a proper
On 12/12/11 09:16, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> I can definitely see a compelling reason to mark CentOS 5.x as supported, but
> the problem with it is it doesn't come with Python 2.6, so BitBake won't work
> out of the box (actually right now it fails before it has a chance to show a
> reasonable er
On Tuesday 06 December 2011 15:59:39 McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 9:43 AM, Paul Eggleton
> wrote:
> > We had some discussions [1] [2] about this last cycle but I don't feel
> > we
> > reached a proper conclusion on the list of tested distributions we want
> > to set (S
On Dec 6, 2011, at 9:43 AM, Paul Eggleton wrote:
Hi all,
We had some discussions [1] [2] about this last cycle but I don't feel we
reached a proper conclusion on the list of tested distributions we want to set
(SANITY_TESTED_DISTROS) and I assume we want to support a few more distros
(latest
2011/12/6 Paul Eggleton :
> Hi all,
>
> We had some discussions [1] [2] about this last cycle but I don't feel we
> reached a proper conclusion on the list of tested distributions we want to set
> (SANITY_TESTED_DISTROS) and I assume we want to support a few more distros
> (latest versions of Fedor
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 9:09 AM, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> On Tuesday 06 December 2011 08:54:30 Flanagan, Elizabeth wrote:
> > The autobuilders are on openSuSE 11.4 x86-64 at this point. We lost
> > I'm testing on Ubuntu 10.10 (with a planned switch over on one dev
> machine
> > to openSuSE 12.1)
>
>
On Tuesday 06 December 2011 08:54:30 Flanagan, Elizabeth wrote:
> The autobuilders are on openSuSE 11.4 x86-64 at this point. We lost
> I'm testing on Ubuntu 10.10 (with a planned switch over on one dev machine
> to openSuSE 12.1)
Sorry, what did we lose?
Cheers,
Paul
--
Paul Eggleton
Intel Op
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 7:59 AM, McClintock Matthew-B29882 <
b29...@freescale.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 9:43 AM, Paul Eggleton
> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > We had some discussions [1] [2] about this last cycle but I don't feel we
> > reached a proper conclusion on the list of tested dis
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 9:43 AM, Paul Eggleton
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We had some discussions [1] [2] about this last cycle but I don't feel we
> reached a proper conclusion on the list of tested distributions we want to set
> (SANITY_TESTED_DISTROS) and I assume we want to support a few more distros
Hi all,
We had some discussions [1] [2] about this last cycle but I don't feel we
reached a proper conclusion on the list of tested distributions we want to set
(SANITY_TESTED_DISTROS) and I assume we want to support a few more distros
(latest versions of Fedora & Ubuntu, presumably?). I'd like
11 matches
Mail list logo
