Hi Mark,
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Hatle [mailto:mark.ha...@windriver.com]
> Sent: Friday, September 02, 2011 11:03 PM
> To: Xu, Dongxiao
> Cc: Richard Purdie (richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org);
> yocto@yoctoproject.org
> Subject: Re: RPM multilib package installation issue
>
>
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 2:29 PM, McClintock Matthew-B29882
wrote:
> FYI: ipkg appears to work fine if you have
> MULTILIB_IMAGE_INSTALL and MULTILIB_PACKAGE_ARCH set.
>
> Will file a bug shortly.
Bug submitted.
http://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1448
-M
FYI: ipkg appears to work fine if you have
MULTILIB_IMAGE_INSTALL and MULTILIB_PACKAGE_ARCH set.
Will file a bug shortly.
-M
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Mark Hatle wrote:
> On 9/2/11 1:36 PM, McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 12:09 PM, Mark Hatle wrote:
>>> For eve
On 9/2/11 1:36 PM, McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 12:09 PM, Mark Hatle wrote:
>> For everything I see, that should work.
>>
>> In classes/image.bbclass, RDEPENDS is augmented by the contents of
>> IMAGE_INSTALL, LINGUAS_INSTALL, MULTILIB_IMAGE_INSTALL, and
>> NORMAL_FEA
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 12:09 PM, Mark Hatle wrote:
> For everything I see, that should work.
>
> In classes/image.bbclass, RDEPENDS is augmented by the contents of
> IMAGE_INSTALL, LINGUAS_INSTALL, MULTILIB_IMAGE_INSTALL, and
> NORMAL_FEATURE_INSTALL.
The bitbake side is fine, It's getting put i
On 9/2/11 11:24 AM, McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 10:48 AM, Mark Hatle wrote:
>> The normal OE approach is to resolve all items by run-time dependencies.
>> That
>> is why a lot more is built then installed.
>>
>> So if you want a system capable of running bash, you w
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 10:48 AM, Mark Hatle wrote:
> The normal OE approach is to resolve all items by run-time dependencies. That
> is why a lot more is built then installed.
>
> So if you want a system capable of running bash, you would create a task (and
> related image) that simply has a RDEP
On 9/2/11 10:40 AM, McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 10:03 AM, Mark Hatle wrote:
>>> However in run time testing I met a problem that, for those libraries whose
>>> base/multilib versions packages will be both built out (like libgtk, it has
>>> "libgtk-2.0-2.22.1-r2.x86_64
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 10:03 AM, Mark Hatle wrote:
>> However in run time testing I met a problem that, for those libraries whose
>> base/multilib versions packages will be both built out (like libgtk, it has
>> "libgtk-2.0-2.22.1-r2.x86_64.rpm" and "libgtk-2.0-2.22.1-r2.x86.rpm"), the
>> rpm will
On 9/2/11 2:33 AM, Xu, Dongxiao wrote:
> Hi Mark and Richard,
>
> I am trying to setup a RPM multilib system that, it is a qemux86-64 base
> image with MULTILIB_IMAGE_INSTALL = "lib32-connman-gnome". With several
> fixes, the build can pass.
>
> However in run time testing I met a problem that, f
Hi Mark and Richard,
I am trying to setup a RPM multilib system that, it is a qemux86-64 base image
with MULTILIB_IMAGE_INSTALL = "lib32-connman-gnome". With several fixes, the
build can pass.
However in run time testing I met a problem that, for those libraries whose
base/multilib versions pa
11 matches
Mail list logo
