Re: [yocto] Layer input

2013-07-08 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 13-07-08 11:16 AM, Paul Eggleton wrote: On Friday 28 June 2013 14:36:48 Khem Raj wrote: On Jun 28, 2013, at 4:22 AM, "Rifenbark, Scott M" wrote: I count eight meta-* layers in the YP repositories that don't exist in the OE area. I understand what you are saying though and I can word it tha

Re: [yocto] Layer input

2013-07-08 Thread Paul Eggleton
On Friday 28 June 2013 14:36:48 Khem Raj wrote: > On Jun 28, 2013, at 4:22 AM, "Rifenbark, Scott M" > wrote: > > I count eight meta-* layers in the YP repositories that don't exist in the > > OE area. I understand what you are saying though and I can word it that > > way to dampen the existence o

Re: [yocto] Layer input

2013-06-28 Thread Khem Raj
On Jun 28, 2013, at 4:22 AM, "Rifenbark, Scott M" wrote: > I count eight meta-* layers in the YP repositories that don't exist in the OE > area. I understand what you are saying though and I can word it that way to > dampen the existence of the "many" differences :) > hmm may be they shoul

Re: [yocto] Layer input

2013-06-28 Thread Paul Eggleton
On Friday 28 June 2013 10:50:01 Rifenbark, Scott M wrote: > Here is the story on the relationship between the YP Metadata Layers as > listed in the YP Source Repositories and the OpenEmbedded Metadata Index. > Functionally, the YP layers are a subset of the OE layers. However, the YP > layers are

Re: [yocto] Layer input

2013-06-27 Thread Rifenbark, Scott M
t;To: Rifenbark, Scott M >Cc: Jerrod Peach; Bruce Ashfield; yocto@yoctoproject.org; Paul Eggleton >Subject: Re: [yocto] Layer input > >On 06/27/2013 03:41 AM, Rifenbark, Scott M wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I have tweaked this figure some based on Bruce and Jerrod's inp

Re: [yocto] Layer input

2013-06-27 Thread Philip Balister
ayers should play together, so the concept of layers exclusive to oe-core does not make sense to me. Philip > > Thanks, > Scott > > From: Jerrod Peach [mailto:pea...@lexmark.com] > Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2013 11:07 AM > To: Rifenbark, Scott M > Cc: yocto@yoctopro

Re: [yocto] Layer input

2013-06-27 Thread Jerrod Peach
ents on the whole > concept of how I am presenting the layers are welcome along with any other > observations. > > ** ** > > Thanks, > > Scott > > ** ** > > *From:* Jerrod Peach [mailto:pea...@lexmark.com] > *Sent:* Tuesday, June 25, 2013 11:07 AM &

Re: [yocto] Layer input

2013-06-25 Thread Jerrod Peach
Scott, - Distro Layer - I'm unclear on what is. Is that supposed to be ? ? It probably shouldn't just be , should it? - Software Layer - Should COPYING.MIT just be COPYING to be more generically applicable? - conf/.conf should be just layer.conf, right? - BS

Re: [yocto] Layer input

2013-06-25 Thread Rifenbark, Scott M
Thanks Bruce. I will implement that. >-Original Message- >From: Bruce Ashfield [mailto:bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com] >Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2013 5:42 AM >To: Rifenbark, Scott M >Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org; Paul Eggleton >Subject: Re: [yocto] Layer input >

Re: [yocto] Layer input

2013-06-25 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 13-06-25 08:35 AM, Rifenbark, Scott M wrote: Hi, This next illustration attempting to dive deeper in the YP Development Process takes the remaining left-side input from that figure in the Quick Start (metadata, Machine, and Policy). Note that when the original figure was created that appe