I'm actively using meta-golang for development and continuing to add features
as I find them necessary. If anyone has suggestions on what would be useful as
a developer of embedded go applications, let me know.
Specifically, I am most interested on input for what would be useful
configuration
On Wednesday 10 of September 2014 13:53:14 Ilya Dmitrichenko wrote:
> Just a quick update, thought I'd let you know that I have a basic
> working layer here:
>
> https://github.com/errordeveloper/oe-meta-go
There's also https://github.com/digitallumens/meta-golang
Based on that I've prepped some
On Wednesday 10 September 2014 14:36:37 Burton, Ross wrote:
> On 10 September 2014 13:53, Ilya Dmitrichenko
wrote:
> > Just a quick update, thought I'd let you know that I have a basic
> > working layer here:
> >
> > https://github.com/errordeveloper/oe-meta-go
>
> Could you consider submitting
On 10 September 2014 13:53, Ilya Dmitrichenko wrote:
> Just a quick update, thought I'd let you know that I have a basic
> working layer here:
>
> https://github.com/errordeveloper/oe-meta-go
Could you consider submitting this to the layer index, layers.openembedded.org?
Cheers,
Ross
--
___
Just a quick update, thought I'd let you know that I have a basic
working layer here:
https://github.com/errordeveloper/oe-meta-go
--
___
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
Hi Leo and Martin,
On 17 April 2014 20:54, Leo Schwab wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 1:49 AM, Martin Donnelly
> wrote:
>> On 05/03/2014 21:55, Leo Schwab wrote:
>>> Has anyone else done any work here? Is there anything that I can
>>> steal^H^H^H^H^Htake inspiration from? Or am I in complete
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 1:49 AM, Martin Donnelly wrote:
> On 05/03/2014 21:55, Leo Schwab wrote:
>> Has anyone else done any work here? Is there anything that I can
>> steal^H^H^H^H^Htake inspiration from? Or am I in completely
>> unexplored territory?
>
> I posted an RFC patch set last year but
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 1:49 AM, Martin Donnelly wrote:
> On 05/03/2014 21:55, Leo Schwab wrote:
>> Has anyone else done any work here? Is there anything that I can
>> steal^H^H^H^H^Htake inspiration from? Or am I in completely
>> unexplored territory?
>
> I posted an RFC patch set last year but
On 05/03/2014 21:55, Leo Schwab wrote:
> Has anyone else done any work here? Is there anything that I can
> steal^H^H^H^H^Htake inspiration from? Or am I in completely
> unexplored territory?
I posted an RFC patch set last year but it didn't get any traction and
we subsequently ruled out use o
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 12:10 PM, Hermanus Botha wrote:
> So I don't really know much about Yocto. But I would also like to see some
> more Go-lang action on Yocto.
Start by generating the gcc runtime and language support in gcc
recipes. add it to RUNTIMETARGET and adjust PACKAGES
you also need
Hermanus Botha writes:
>
> So I don't really know much about Yocto. But I would also like to see some
> more Go-lang action on Yocto.
>
> This section of their manual seems promising.
> http://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/current/ref-manual/ref-manual.html#cross-
> development-toolchain-generati
So I don't really know much about Yocto. But I would also like to see some
more Go-lang action on Yocto.
This section of their manual seems promising.
http://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/current/ref-manual/ref-manual.html#cross-
development-toolchain-generation
--
We have gotten it into our minds to write some of the apps on our
device in Go, a shiny new compiled language from Google (
http://golang.org/ ). However, Go has very -- shall we say --
independent ideas about how to organize, fetch, build, and deploy code
which would, at first glance, appear to c
13 matches
Mail list logo
