On 16-09-15 18:43, Paul D. DeRocco wrote:
From: Mike Looijmans
"Embedded" in my world is not about RAM or disk size. It's about
building a device that has a set task in life, and nothing is as
important as that one task. Whether that's running on an i7
or an M3 is irrelevant.
For a system to ac
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 2:07 PM, Paul D. DeRocco wrote:
> Do you mean systemd or syslinux?
none of these it was typo it should be read as 'systems'
--
___
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
> From: Khem Raj [mailto:raj.k...@gmail.com]
>
> Generally when you have systemd which copy images to RAM and then run
> from RAM would not want that extra 50 odd Megs gone
> for storing extra tools in some case.
Do you mean systemd or syslinux?
--
Ciao, Paul D. DeRocco
Paul
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 9:43 AM, Paul D. DeRocco wrote:
> If you've got a 1GB eSSD drive, because that's the smallest you can buy,
> having a 382MB image rather than a 346MB image isn't a waste of anything.
> How much boot time increase do you think you'll get from full-featured
> command line too
> From: Mike Looijmans
>
> "Embedded" in my world is not about RAM or disk size. It's about
> building a device that has a set task in life, and nothing is as
> important as that one task. Whether that's running on an i7
> or an M3 is irrelevant.
>
> For a system to acquire and process sensor d
On 16-09-15 03:13, Khem Raj wrote:
On Sep 15, 2015, at 7:47 AM, Trevor Woerner wrote:
On 09/15/15 04:26, Paul D. DeRocco wrote:
My embedded system has enough room in it for full-featured command line
tools,...
"Embedded" in my world is not about RAM or disk size. It's about
building a device t
> From: Khem Raj [mailto:raj.k...@gmail.com]
>
> I agree on busybox differences but sometimes its not about
> the utilities they are needed for some sundry work.
> What would be interesting to know is how much size increase
> is caused by replacing all busybox functionality
> with other utiliti
> On Sep 15, 2015, at 7:47 AM, Trevor Woerner wrote:
>
> On 09/15/15 04:26, Paul D. DeRocco wrote:
>> My embedded system has enough room in it for full-featured command line
>> tools, instead of the wretched busybox. Does the Yocto meta-data include a
>> layer that provides such tools? Or does O
> From: Bob Cochran
>
> Do you know offhand how much bigger the rootfs would be if you build
> core-image-base without busybox and instead use the real applications?
>
> Also, how many more packages have to be built / managed?
I just added packagegroup-core-full-cmdline to my image, and it incr
> From: Paul Eggleton [mailto:paul.eggle...@linux.intel.com]
>
> core-image-full-cmdline (and the packagegroup it uses,
> packagegroup-core-full-
> cmdline) should give you the former, and the full tools will
> in almost all
> cases take precedence simply by being installed by virtue of
> the
On 09/15/2015 02:22 PM, Trevor Woerner wrote:
On 09/15/15 13:01, Bob Cochran wrote:
On 09/15/2015 12:38 PM, Romain Perier wrote:
Hi all,
I disagree,
Unfortunately some embedded devices in the industry are not like most
of the tablets and smartphones in the market (no quad or octo cores
with fe
On 09/15/15 13:01, Bob Cochran wrote:
> On 09/15/2015 12:38 PM, Romain Perier wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I disagree,
>> Unfortunately some embedded devices in the industry are not like most
>> of the tablets and smartphones in the market (no quad or octo cores
>> with few GB of ram... and few GB of fl
On 09/15/2015 12:38 PM, Romain Perier wrote:
Hi all,
I disagree,
Unfortunately some embedded devices in the industry are not like most
of the tablets and smartphones in the market (no quad or octo cores
with few GB of ram... and few GB of flash...) ;) .For example,
these days, at work, we're
Hi all,
I disagree,
Unfortunately some embedded devices in the industry are not like most
of the tablets and smartphones in the market (no quad or octo cores
with few GB of ram... and few GB of flash...) ;) .For example,
these days, at work, we're designing a board with the SoC zynq-7000
and a
On 09/15/2015 10:53 AM, Trevor Woerner wrote:
> On 09/15/15 10:47, Trevor Woerner wrote:
>> The only place busybox (and
>> toybox) are needed today are in the MMU-less-type systems, such as
>> Cortex-Ms etc.
>
> Actually, the presence or lack of MMU is irrelevant, I meant to single
> out those sy
On 09/15/15 10:47, Trevor Woerner wrote:
> The only place busybox (and
> toybox) are needed today are in the MMU-less-type systems, such as
> Cortex-Ms etc.
Actually, the presence or lack of MMU is irrelevant, I meant to single
out those systems with limited on-SoC flash.
--
_
On 09/15/15 04:26, Paul D. DeRocco wrote:
> My embedded system has enough room in it for full-featured command line
> tools, instead of the wretched busybox. Does the Yocto meta-data include a
> layer that provides such tools? Or does OE? And how would I disable
> busybox in order to use the better
On 15 September 2015 at 09:45, Paul Eggleton
wrote:
> core-image-full-cmdline (and the packagegroup it uses,
> packagegroup-core-full-
> cmdline) should give you the former, and the full tools will in almost all
> cases take precedence simply by being installed by virtue of the
> alternatives
> s
Hi Paul,
On Tuesday 15 September 2015 01:26:20 Paul D. DeRocco wrote:
> My embedded system has enough room in it for full-featured command line
> tools, instead of the wretched busybox. Does the Yocto meta-data include a
> layer that provides such tools? Or does OE? And how would I disable
> busyb
My embedded system has enough room in it for full-featured command line
tools, instead of the wretched busybox. Does the Yocto meta-data include a
layer that provides such tools? Or does OE? And how would I disable
busybox in order to use the better tools?
--
Ciao, Paul D. DeRocco
20 matches
Mail list logo
