On 4 July 2013 03:48, Trevor Woerner wrote:
> I'm using the latest released version of openSuSE (12.3), 64-bit, and
> recent pulls from master have started complaining that my make-3.82 is
> broken, so I had to manually downgrade to make-3.81.
File a bug with suse about this, they've fixed up pre
On 28 June 2013 06:53, Burton, Ross wrote:
> On 28 June 2013 11:16, Paul Barker wrote:
>> Just chiming in to say that sounds excellent. Will this contain a
>> known-working make as well for those with a broken make 3.82?
>
> What systems have a broken 3.82? I'm aware that Debian Experimental
> h
On 28 June 2013 18:03, Mark Hatle wrote:
> Fedora 16 and newer
> Arch Linux
> Debian Experimental
>
> I wouldn't be surprised if there are others.
>
> (I filed a bug for Fedora, so FC 18 and FC 19 will be fixed if they're not
> already.)
I'm pretty sure FC17 onwards is fixed.
Ross
__
On 6/28/13 5:53 AM, Burton, Ross wrote:
On 28 June 2013 11:16, Paul Barker wrote:
Just chiming in to say that sounds excellent. Will this contain a
known-working make as well for those with a broken make 3.82?
What systems have a broken 3.82? I'm aware that Debian Experimental
has it, but st
On 28 Jun 2013, at 10:06, ChenQi wrote:
> On 06/28/2013 04:55 PM, Chris Tapp wrote:
>> I'm experimenting with meta-fsl-arm and I need to use 'master' for some of
>> the latest updates. However, when I build I get told that "Bitbake requires
>> Python 2.7.3".
>>
>> My development system is Ubun
On 28 June 2013 11:16, Paul Barker wrote:
> Just chiming in to say that sounds excellent. Will this contain a
> known-working make as well for those with a broken make 3.82?
What systems have a broken 3.82? I'm aware that Debian Experimental
has it, but stable/testing/unstable have a working 3.8
Hi Paul,
On Friday 28 June 2013 11:16:14 Paul Barker wrote:
> On 28 June 2013 10:40, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> > FWIW, for older hosts where installing these tools in the normal fashion
> > is difficult or impractical, there is now buildtools-tarball (which replaces
> > and extends the old external-
: Re: [yocto] Bitbake requires Python 2.7.3
>
>Hi Chris,
>
>On Friday 28 June 2013 09:55:42 Chris Tapp wrote:
>> I'm experimenting with meta-fsl-arm and I need to use 'master' for
>some of
>> the latest updates. However, when I build I get told that "Bitba
On 28 June 2013 10:40, Paul Eggleton wrote:
>
> FWIW, for older hosts where installing these tools in the normal fashion is
> difficult or impractical, there is now buildtools-tarball (which replaces and
> extends the old external-python-tarball). This builds on the relocatable SDK
> installer to
Hi Chris,
On Friday 28 June 2013 09:55:42 Chris Tapp wrote:
> I'm experimenting with meta-fsl-arm and I need to use 'master' for some of
> the latest updates. However, when I build I get told that "Bitbake requires
> Python 2.7.3".
>
> My development system is Ubuntu 11.10, which only has 2.7.2 (
On 06/28/2013 04:55 PM, Chris Tapp wrote:
I'm experimenting with meta-fsl-arm and I need to use 'master' for some of the latest
updates. However, when I build I get told that "Bitbake requires Python 2.7.3".
My development system is Ubuntu 11.10, which only has 2.7.2 (and is out of support, so
I'm experimenting with meta-fsl-arm and I need to use 'master' for some of the
latest updates. However, when I build I get told that "Bitbake requires Python
2.7.3".
My development system is Ubuntu 11.10, which only has 2.7.2 (and is out of
support, so no updates!) and the "latest" "Quick Start
12 matches
Mail list logo
