On Wed, 2011-07-27 at 09:23 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> I was wondering what distinction qualified for a BSP existing in a
> meta layer vs in poky directly.
>
> For FSL PPC we currently have MPC8315-RDB in poky. Ideally we'd have
> one BSP for each major flavor [ associated with a unique compiler
On 07/27/11 10:23, Kumar Gala wrote:
I was wondering what distinction qualified for a BSP existing in a meta layer
vs in poky directly.
For FSL PPC we currently have MPC8315-RDB in poky. Ideally we'd have one BSP
for each major flavor [ associated with a unique compiler / libc target ].
Thi
I was wondering what distinction qualified for a BSP existing in a meta layer
vs in poky directly.
For FSL PPC we currently have MPC8315-RDB in poky. Ideally we'd have one BSP
for each major flavor [ associated with a unique compiler / libc target ].
This would end up being something like P20
