So, I have run into three issues with the meta-raspberrypi layer when
trying use it with Poky:
* the libav bbappend; this can be BBMASKED on distro level, so that's
not a significant problem,
* rpi-zram-service: a simple but rather hackish fix is to provide
rpi-zram-service-initd package that p
Or we can set up a distro file so that we can use it out of the box and in
case ppl want to use custom distros use BBMASK. A pull request was sent
with some other stuff as well.
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Gary Thomas wrote:
> On 2012-05-21 09:34, John Willis wrote:
>
>> Hi Paul,
>>
>> Th
On 2012-05-21 09:34, John Willis wrote:
Hi Paul,
That had been my plan but I got the impression that was frowned up in
the Yocto environment.
Well, IMHO it's suboptimal, but far less so than two separate competing
layers that ultimately exist for the same purpose.
Pushed a note in the READM
Hi Paul,
> > That had been my plan but I got the impression that was frowned up in
> > the Yocto environment.
>
> Well, IMHO it's suboptimal, but far less so than two separate competing
> layers that ultimately exist for the same purpose.
Pushed a note in the README with suggestions on a suitabl
On Monday 21 May 2012 16:16:47 John Willis wrote:
> > > For example parsing libav and rpi-zram-service will fail. We don't
> > > have libav and we don't have systemd yet in poky.
> >
> > OK, sure, that isn't ideal - however meta-ti suffers from this issue as
> > well, and they have instructions in
Hi Paul,
> > For example parsing libav and rpi-zram-service will fail. We don't
> > have libav and we don't have systemd yet in poky.
>
> OK, sure, that isn't ideal - however meta-ti suffers from this issue as
well,
> and they have instructions in the layer README which tell people the
> BBMASK t
Hi,
On 21/05/12 09:47, Andrei Gherzan wrote:
> There are issues that cannot be solved with just one layer. A distro is
> a workaround but still. More about this, rpi layer will be included in
> yocto project repos as Richard plans so it makes sense to have a yocto
> specific layer. It could be a
On Monday 21 May 2012 12:25:56 Andrei Gherzan wrote:
> For example parsing libav and rpi-zram-service will fail. We don't have
> libav and we don't have systemd yet in poky.
OK, sure, that isn't ideal - however meta-ti suffers from this issue as well,
and they have instructions in the layer READM
On 05/21/2012 12:19 PM, Paul Eggleton wrote:
On Monday 21 May 2012 11:47:15 Andrei Gherzan wrote:
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Tomas Frydrych wrote:
On 19/05/12 22:51, Andrei Gherzan wrote:
After an exchange of messages with Richard, Saul and John Willis (he
already started a layer for oe
On Monday 21 May 2012 11:47:15 Andrei Gherzan wrote:
> On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Tomas Frydrych wrote:
> > On 19/05/12 22:51, Andrei Gherzan wrote:
> > > After an exchange of messages with Richard, Saul and John Willis (he
> > > already started a layer for oe and did a good job in it) i wan
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Tomas Frydrych <
tf+lists.yo...@r-finger.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 19/05/12 22:51, Andrei Gherzan wrote:
> > After an exchange of messages with Richard, Saul and John Willis (he
> > already started a layer for oe and did a good job in it) i want to
> > announce tha
Hi,
On 19/05/12 22:51, Andrei Gherzan wrote:
> After an exchange of messages with Richard, Saul and John Willis (he
> already started a layer for oe and did a good job in it) i want to
> announce that i started start a fork from his layer and with Florin
> Sarbu will prepare a layer for RaspberryP
12 matches
Mail list logo
