于 2011年12月21日 23:38, Bruce Ashfield 写道:
On 11-12-21 10:24 AM, zumeng.chen wrote:
This patch has been validated by the following commands
on both CPUs with or without cache alias, which is for
http://bugzilla.pokylinux.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1429
Glad to see this. I was composing an email that ha
On 11-12-21 10:24 AM, zumeng.chen wrote:
This patch has been validated by the following commands
on both CPUs with or without cache alias, which is for
http://bugzilla.pokylinux.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1429
Glad to see this. I was composing an email that had just this
question. Which bug, and whic
This patch has been validated by the following commands
on both CPUs with or without cache alias, which is for
http://bugzilla.pokylinux.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1429
root@routerstationpro:~# dmesg|grep alias
Primary data cache 32kB, 4-way, VIPT, cache aliases, linesize 32 bytes
root@routerstationpro
For tmpfs, no matter which flag(ASYNC or SYNC) gets from msync,
there is not so much thing to do for CPUs without cache alias,
But for some CPUs with cache alias, msync has to flush cache
explicitly, which makes sure the data coherency between memory
file and cache.
Signed-off-by: Zumeng Chen
---
