Hi,
I have intiated few discussions earlier to support binary configuration
tool,
which allows configuration of post built binaries to generate custom image,
without a need to rebuild from source.
It is being tracked under bug 3252.
Design to realize the same is updated in wiki.
I agree that each product might have different connectivity and different
configuration needs on the rootfs.
However current thoughts are based on
1) Some of the common configurations of YP are currently at build time in yocto
project, but appying them doesnot require a rebuild. Such configurati
This is in reference to my previous post regarding post build configuration,
with few points re-iterating to set the ground.
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto/2012-November/012867.html
"Post build" configuration and need for configuration platform/model:
There have been sev
Added few more thoughts
Looking for possible options to implement Offline Configuration Tool
requirement. please check and comment on it.
Configuration flow:
a) Task do_createconfig will generate data to configure. This serves as input
for configuration UI in OCT.
b) OCT UI will read that conf
Looking for comments. Thanks
From: Bruce Ashfield [bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2012 12:59 AM
To: Venkata ramana gollamudi
Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org; Sanil kumar; Hatle, Mark; 'dvh...@linux.intel.com'
Subject: Re: [y
Reply inline
> -Original Message-
> From: Bruce Ashfield [mailto:bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2012 8:53 PM
> To: Venkata ramana gollamudi
> Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org; Sanil kumar; Hatle, Mark
> Subject: Re: [yocto] Need for offline bi
Poky allows to build custom Linux for you, but we have cases where the post
build customization is required, like user-addition, network configuration,
service control. Even selecting the required packages can be a post build
activity.
The current model requires the image to be rebuilt to suppo
You can check the same with "strace -f bash"
You can see the files being loaded, as there is a rc file loading sequence
exists for bash.
Regards,
Ramana
From: yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org [yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org] on behalf
of Jonathan Haws [jo
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 12:43:27PM -0400, Jerrod Peach wrote:
> I was thinking about doing something very close to that in actual Yocto,
> except I'd store only the revisions/branches that were different from what
> the bb file prescribed in local.conf. I ran that idea by a couple of
> colleagues
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 12:43:27PM -0400, Jerrod Peach wrote:
> I was thinking about doing something very close to that in actual Yocto,
> except I'd store only the revisions/branches that were different from what
> the bb file prescribed in local.conf. I ran that idea by a couple of
> colleagues
Hi All,
Is there any method exists to use same sstate_cache across 32&64bit machines?
Like can we generate 32bit sstate_cache for native packages on 64bit machine,
so that same sstate_cache can be used across 32bit & 64bit (with 32bit ib
support) machines, without a need to rebuild the native
Hi,
Is there any mechanism to disable package management, so that my rootfs
should not have any package management related packages like opkg etc.
I found that one of the methods ipk/rpm/deb need to be mandatorily selected.
Please suggest if any such method exists.
Regards,
Ramana
Hi,
We tried to build yocto release downloaded from autobuilder
http://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/pub/nightly/20120621-3/yocto.tar.bz2
We work behind a http proxy and firewall setup from office network.
Previously we used to build by setting PREMIRRORS
13 matches
Mail list logo
