Re: [yocto] new system booting directly to halt

2016-09-30 Thread Maxwell Bottiger
Got it. I needed to turn switch on CONFIG_DEVTMPFS=y, and CONFIG_DEVTMPFS_MOUNT=y in the kernel. Now dev is populated and everything else came along with it. Thanks! -Max On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 12:16 PM, Maxwell Bottiger < sleepyli...@jive-turkey.net> wrote: > Chris, > >

Re: [yocto] new system booting directly to halt

2016-09-30 Thread Maxwell Bottiger
d, /sbin/init should point (possibly > through /etc/alternatives) to a systemd executable. You get the idea. > > Good luck, > > Chris > > > On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 3:18 PM, Maxwell Bottiger < > sleepyli...@jive-turkey.net> wrote: > >> I've been wor

[yocto] new system booting directly to halt

2016-09-29 Thread Maxwell Bottiger
I've been working on setting up a poky distro on an older intel XScale system, and I finally got a working kernel and root filesystem. However, when I boot the box it zips through runlevel 5, then halts. It seems to me like maybe init isn't kicking off getty or some sort of interactive login. Has

Re: [yocto] Missing _bsddb.so from python build

2015-07-23 Thread Maxwell Bottiger
y image. Adding PREFERRED_VERSION_db = "5.3.28" to my local.conf file did the trick. On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 10:15 AM, Maxwell Bottiger < sleepyli...@jive-turkey.net> wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to build python in yocto, and I'm hung up on a missing > library. I

[yocto] Missing _bsddb.so from python build

2015-07-22 Thread Maxwell Bottiger
Hi, I'm trying to build python in yocto, and I'm hung up on a missing library. I've built python-bsddb, and I see all of the .py and .pyc libraries, but I don't have _bsddb.so in lib-dynload. I see the python-2.7-mainfest.inc either installs it or expects to install it, but I can't get anything t

[yocto] determining ubi build parameters

2013-11-07 Thread Maxwell Bottiger
I have a UBI JFFS file system I just built and flashed onto my at91sam9x5ek board. I think everything built correctly, but I get the following error when booting the device: Scanning device for bad blocks Bad eraseblock 1101 at 0x089a Bad eraseblock 1309 at 0x0a3a 2 cmdlinepart pa

Re: [yocto] architecture mismatch during kernel build (40 to 3)

2013-11-05 Thread Maxwell Bottiger
-Max On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Maxwell Bottiger < sleepyli...@jive-turkey.net> wrote: > Ok. so, I should backtrack a bit, just so I understand the issue > completely. This is my first time putting together a bitbake recipe, and > the kernel is a complex little beastie. &

Re: [yocto] architecture mismatch during kernel build (40 to 3)

2013-11-05 Thread Maxwell Bottiger
ppend # file. Leaving it empty here ensures an early explicit build failure. #COMPATIBLE_MACHINE = "(xo1-mvs)" COMPATIBLE_MACHINE = "(sama5d3xek|at91sam9x5ek)" # clean up after module installation do_install_append() { rm -f mkimage } On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 11:28 PM, Bruce A

[yocto] architecture mismatch during kernel build (40 to 3)

2013-11-04 Thread Maxwell Bottiger
I'm building a custom kernel, and I think I'm nearly there. I'm seeing an error when running mkimage. bitbake is complaining about an architecure mismatch, but I don't know which files it is comparing, or if the mismatch really matters (32bit x86 vs 64bit x86 or whatever) Here's the error string

Re: [yocto] 2.6.39 kernel and poky

2013-11-04 Thread Maxwell Bottiger
board and > our custom hardware. Feel free to fork my layer or Atmel’s layer and add > support for the 2.6.39 kernel. Atmel has been accepting pull requests on > additional features. > > > > -Bryan Evenson > > > > *From:* yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mai

[yocto] 2.6.39 kernel and poky

2013-11-01 Thread Maxwell Bottiger
I have a custom kernel and drivers I built for an Atmel AT91SAM9x5ek system on a chip, and I'd like to use them with yocto to build a distribution. The original documentation, support CD, etc are all based around an open embedded build from 2011, which doesn't seem to work any longer. Yocto looks