[yocto] [RFC] Yocto Bug 5044, 6149 PREFERRED_PROVIDER runtime

viders.py: Add package name to PREFERRED_PROVIDER search (2015-05-05 18:35:07 -0400) -------- Jate Sujjavanich (1): providers.py: Add package name to PREFERRED_PROVIDER search bitbake/lib/bb/providers.py |1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+

[yocto] local.conf assignment priority with autobuilder

I am attempting to control debug-tweaks via an image recipe. Previous posts suggest that the autobuilder will use auto.conf and ignore local.conf. However, meta/conf/bitbake.conf says that the include order is auto.conf, and then local.conf. This means that the default local.conf.template install

Re: [yocto] base-files: /etc/profile profile.d execution order

I moved the profile.d loop in my build the end of the etc profile script. Should this change be made in base-files? - Jate S. On Thursday, August 7, 2014, Jate S wrote: > I am trying to use a file in profile.d to override the default umask > in /etc/profile. However, the umask line in /etc/pr

Re: [yocto] Bitbake Commander Content Assist on bbappend files

...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Jate Sujjavanich Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2013 3:55 PM To: 'yocto@yoctoproject.org' Subject: [yocto] Bitbake Commander Content Assist on bbappend files Hover content assist works for me with .bb files, but not .bbap

[yocto] Bitbake Commander Content Assist on bbappend files

Hover content assist works for me with .bb files, but not .bbappend files under Eclipse with bitbake commander plugin. Should it? Jate S. ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto

[yocto] xserver-xorg setuid bit

I have been getting a permissions error when starting X server as a non-root user. The setuid bit is not set on /usr/bin/Xorg, so I have added a recipes-graphics/xserver-xorg_1.14.0.bbappend file that contains the following: # Setuid on Xorg server. Allows multiple users to run X do_install_app

[yocto] Yocto Bitbake Commander New Project Bug

Creating a Yocto Bitbake Commander project using an existing poky directory is a little buggy. I usually do this to avoid downloading poky from the Internet. The plugin wizard implies that you can use a poky directory in your workspace with its clone from yocto repository option. Attempting to

Re: [yocto] yocto-bsp and kconf-check

ursday, August 29, 2013 3:45 PM > To: Jate Sujjavanich > Cc: 'yocto@yoctoproject.org' > Subject: Re: [yocto] yocto-bsp and kconf-check > > On 13-08-29 02:56 PM, Jate Sujjavanich wrote: > >> Which kernel version ? > > > > This is linux-yocto-3.8 and the

Re: [yocto] yocto-bsp and kconf-check

cfg warning. Any ideas? > -Original Message- > From: Bruce Ashfield [mailto:bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com] > Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2013 11:52 AM > To: Jate Sujjavanich > Cc: 'yocto@yoctoproject.org' > Subject: Re: [yocto] yocto-bsp and kconf-check > > On 13-08-29

[yocto] yocto-bsp and kconf-check

It appears that the yocto-bsp script generates a kernel configuration that creates some warnings during kern-tools' kconf_check. The {{machine}}.cfg file has many non-hardware options, therefore the script warns. It seems like many of these should be in the standard kernel configuration. Is thi

[yocto] sstate-cache and local files causing invalidation

I am attempting to set up a shared sstate-cache directory. I added a SSTATE_MIRROS So far, it seems that recipes with local files in the SRC_URI are triggering a rebuild. The filename/checksum is stored with the filename as the full local path. Running bitbake-sigdiff on the fetch stamps yields

[yocto] yocto 1.0 download link

The page http://yoctoproject.org/download/yocto/yocto-project-1.0-release-notes-poky-5.0 is missing a download link. It's available on http://yoctoproject.org/download, but I had to search for a while. Jate ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject