Hi Khem,
what do you mean with "build bpkg as a native recipe"? I though that the
DEPENDS = "build2-native" will achieve this task. Thanks to pointing out
the hosttool option.
Best regards,
Gabriele
Il giorno lun 13 mag 2019 alle ore 17:59 Khem Raj ha
scritto:
> You need to either build bpkg a
From: Richard Purdie
Matching changes in OE-Core. drop OETestID.
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie
Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster
---
meta-yocto-bsp/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/systemd_boot.py | 3 ---
1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/meta-yocto-bsp/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/systemd_boot.py
b
From: Naveen Saini
Bump to kernel release v4.19.19
Signed-off-by: Naveen Saini
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie
Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster
---
meta-yocto-bsp/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_4.19.bbappend | 8
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
From: Armin Kuster
please review these change for the next meta-yocto warrior update
The following changes since commit 299b4150c66520985415fcc91119d563f7ba663c:
poky.conf: Bump version for 2.7 warrior release (2019-04-12 13:50:29 +0100)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.y
On 5/13/19 1:09 PM, Joshua Watt wrote:
> On Mon, May 6, 2019 at 12:43 PM Volosincu, Andreea S
> wrote:
>> Hi Joshua,
>>
>>
>>
>> The event will be listed on the co-located events page and there will be a
>> cost associated with it. Please check this page in a couple of days -
>> https://events
On Mon, May 6, 2019 at 12:43 PM Volosincu, Andreea S
wrote:
>
> Hi Joshua,
>
>
>
> The event will be listed on the co-located events page and there will be a
> cost associated with it. Please check this page in a couple of days -
> https://events.linuxfoundation.org/events/elc-north-america-2019
also read through
https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/TipsAndTricks/Packaging_Prebuilt_Libraries
This might be helpful especially section under Non-versioned Libraries
On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 10:56 AM Burton, Ross wrote:
>
> On Mon, 13 May 2019 at 09:54, Matthias Schoepfer
> wrote:
> > I am try
On Mon, 13 May 2019 at 09:54, Matthias Schoepfer
wrote:
> I am trying to write a recipe for a rather tricky component (that has
> plugins and stuff). Anyhow, I cannot get bitbake not to complain that
> rdepends on -dev. And if I INSANE_SKIP it,
> the -dev package will get installed. But I cannot
Hello Bruce, Chris,
Thank you both for the replies.
Usually, the kernel header files/kernel source code for the used
kernels are put under: /usr/src/kernels/`uname -r`/
But this, my best guess, is an implementation detail (probably each
distro has its own rule/merit).
Since YOCTO is just one of
Hi!
I am trying to write a recipe for a rather tricky component (that has
plugins and stuff). Anyhow, I cannot get bitbake not to complain that
rdepends on -dev. And if I INSANE_SKIP it,
the -dev package will get installed. But I cannot figure out which file
is responsible. I tried to ldd al
When build directory is deeply nested, the shebang limit of 127
characters is hit, which leads to doltlibtool failing to execute.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin
---
recipes-mono/mono/mono-5.xx.inc | 4
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/recipes-mono/mono/mono-5.xx.inc b/recipes
You need to either build bpkg as a native recipe or install and make it
available as a hosttool from build machine distribution itself
On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 6:07 AM Gabriele Zampieri
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I need to add a couple of tools to my build system (build2 and odb). The
> second one depe
On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 7:19 AM Edson Seabra
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> Thanks Khem Raj.
>
>
> As this package name is generate internally by poky/yocto I did this patch
> to make it build:
>
>
> *edson@ubuntu-16*:*oe*$ git diff package.py
>
> *diff --git a/meta/lib/oe/package.py b/meta/lib/oe/package.py
Thanks Ralph for informative reply .
Will check once again after deleting the file you suggested .
Ashish
On Mon, May 13, 2019, 7:05 PM Ralph Siemsen
wrote:
> Hi Ashish,
>
> On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 5:57 AM AshishKumar Mishra <
> ashish.emailaddr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> So , time shown by "un
Dear all,
CORRECTION: the next Twitch session will take place *tomorrow* on May
14th, not May 13th. We are sorry about the inconvenience , we had a
glitch in the date! The time and content of the session remain
unchanged.
cheers
nico
On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 6:59 AM Volosincu, Andreea S
wrote:
>
Hi Ashish,
On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 5:57 AM AshishKumar Mishra <
ashish.emailaddr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> So , time shown by "uname -a" is retains older value even though
> i had compiled the linux multiple times .
>
This is normal behaviour, even when building the kernel directly (eg. not
using Y
On 13/05/19 11:41, AshishKumar Mishra wrote:
Yes , i checked the value & increased it 64K ( got pointer from
https://hub.docker.com/r/wolverine2k/yocto-build-env/)
It got the same error again today .
Currently i have increased the value from 64K to 512K.
But raised the query to check if i am
> An application like "sed" does a rename after write, but that's totally
> unrelated to your issue. Sed does that because it cannot write to the file
> it's also reading from.
It might be the reason behind the rename, but you can also argue that
it is expected that a program that edits a file eit
Hi all,
I need to add a couple of tools to my build system (build2 and odb). The
second one depends on the first. Following a snippet of the build2 recipe:
DEPENDS = "openssl-native"
SRC_URI = "https://dow
> Gesendet: Montag, 13. Mai 2019 um 13:45 Uhr
> Von: mikko.rap...@bmw.de
> An: s...@gmx.li
> Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org
> Betreff: Re: [yocto] long time for starting sshd (wait for crng init done ?)
>
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 01:07:45PM +0200, s...@gmx.li wrote:
> > >From yocto 2.5 to 2
On 5/13/19 2:07 PM, s...@gmx.li wrote:
> From yocto 2.5 to 2.7 I noticed a change in booting. The kernel stops for
> around 85 seconds.
> It seems to me that starting sshd takes time until crng init is done.
> In 2.5 it doesn't wait for that. How can I avoid that?
> Maybe I have to add that I use
Hi,
On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 01:07:45PM +0200, s...@gmx.li wrote:
> >From yocto 2.5 to 2.7 I noticed a change in booting. The kernel stops for
> >around 85 seconds.
> It seems to me that starting sshd takes time until crng init is done.
> In 2.5 it doesn't wait for that. How can I avoid that?
> Ma
>From yocto 2.5 to 2.7 I noticed a change in booting. The kernel stops for
>around 85 seconds.
It seems to me that starting sshd takes time until crng init is done.
In 2.5 it doesn't wait for that. How can I avoid that?
Maybe I have to add that I use a recipe that adds keys as rootfs is usually r/
Yes , i checked the value & increased it 64K ( got pointer from
https://hub.docker.com/r/wolverine2k/yocto-build-env/)
It got the same error again today .
Currently i have increased the value from 64K to 512K.
But raised the query to check if i am doing any thing wrong here or missing
any caution.
On Mon, 2019-05-13 at 15:38 +0530, AshishKumar Mishra wrote:
> Can team members please let me know the solution & what is causing
> the below mentioned error ?
> ( I am having around 128GB of disk space still left , hence don't
> think that space is the issue here )
>
> ~/Documents/linux-foundatio
Hi Members ,
Can team members please let me know the solution & what is causing the
below mentioned error ?
( I am having around 128GB of disk space still left , hence don't think
that space is the issue here )
~/Documents/linux-foundation-projects/yocto/poky/build (slef-bsp) : bitbake
-vn virtua
Hi,
I've been having trouble building openjdk-8-native over the weekend.
Fetching is failing with 500 Internal Server Error.
I assumed it was just a weekend fluke, but it's still failing today:
--2019-05-13 09:45:27--
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/langtools/archive/34ee52bc68a4.tar.
Yes .
But this difference we expect in some minutes.
But what i am observing is ( attached snapshot ) :-
1) First Compilation around ( 4:10)
bitbake cleanall + bitbake core-image-minimal
uname-a: Time shown is
4:24
timestamp of file
On 5/13/19 10:46 AM, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 10:32:48AM +0300, Mark Hatle wrote:
>> On 5/12/19 9:04 PM, akuster808 wrote:
>>> ok, so no Admins. This is unexceptionable.
>>>
>>> OE TSC and Board, I believe its your time to get involved.
>>
>> I've not used patchwork before, do y
On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 10:32:48AM +0300, Mark Hatle wrote:
> On 5/12/19 9:04 PM, akuster808 wrote:
> > ok, so no Admins. This is unexceptionable.
> >
> > OE TSC and Board, I believe its your time to get involved.
>
> I've not used patchwork before, do you know who originally configured it? Was
Off Topic @: The same chaos as with German Govt. (KVR and Finanzamt).
Zoran
___
On Sun, May 12, 2019 at 8:05 PM akuster808 wrote:
>
> ok, so no Admins. This is unexceptionable.
>
> OE TSC and Board, I believe its your time to get involved.
>
> regards,
> Armin
>
> On 5/3/19 10:18 AM, akuster
On 5/12/19 9:04 PM, akuster808 wrote:
> ok, so no Admins. This is unexceptionable.
>
> OE TSC and Board, I believe its your time to get involved.
I've not used patchwork before, do you know who originally configured it? Was
it Paul Eggleton, or Richard, or? If I have an idea who was originally
32 matches
Mail list logo
