[yocto] Out-of-tree kernel module is unbuildable

Hello, I'm trying to add an external kernel module to my layer by following this guide in the Yocto Kernel Development Manual and using the recommended template: 2.10.2. Incorporating Out-of-Tree Modules

[yocto] Why can diffsigs take sometimes really looooong?

Hi! At times I find the diffsigs command useful/educational to understand what is going on in my build. $ bitbake-diffsigs -t myimage do_image Often the result is shown in no time. However, recently I got some cases were it takes 150 (!) minutes to show a simple difference (1 line changed in do_

Re: [yocto] LLVM: error adding symbols: File in wrong format

Hi Khem, For meta-clang -- I'm on rocko. Is that truly too old? I'm going to switch to sumo in the next few weeks, but I was hoping to nail some of these recipes before I switch to sumo (one of the bigger things is the update to the linux kernel when switching will give me a bunch of patches for Q

Re: [yocto] LLVM: error adding symbols: File in wrong format

Hi Giordon I realised that you are on an older release can you cherry pick https://github.com/kraj/meta-clang/commit/e9def8f1 I hope that will be helpful this was done for armv7ve/rpi3 I think that you need to add following for your case. If it works you can send the patches for the branch you

Re: [yocto] [PATCH] runtime: Add support to manual BSP test cases

On 07/13/2018 05:08 AM, mohamad.noor.alim.hus...@intel.com wrote: > From: Mohamad Noor Alim Hussin > > This is manual BSP test cases that have converted to auto test cases > for QA release. Manualbsp.py has dependency on file bsphardware that run > on hardware. How do the TestID get determined?

Re: [yocto] LLVM: error adding symbols: File in wrong format

Hi Khem, I've uploaded the gist here: https://gist.github.com/ef8b964d563b9b0c5249b199033d7b6e Looks like the error is: clang-5.0: error: the clang compiler does not support '-march=armv7-a' Giordon On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 1:30 AM Khem Raj wrote: > Hi Giordon > > I think there is something e

[yocto] [PATCH] runtime: Add support to manual BSP test cases

From: Mohamad Noor Alim Hussin This is manual BSP test cases that have converted to auto test cases for QA release. Manualbsp.py has dependency on file bsphardware that run on hardware. Signed-off-by: Mohamad Noor Alim Hussin --- meta/lib/oeqa/runtime/cases/manualbsp.py | 122 +

[yocto] [PATCH] [yocto-ab-helper] scripts/run-jinja-parser: Add parser to generate LAVA job-config

This patch is added to generate the LAVA job-config based on config-intelqa-x86_64-lava.json,lava.py, jinja2 template to construct the job definition in YAML using autobuilder. Signed-off-by: Aaron Chan --- scripts/run-jinja-parser | 121 +++ 1 file ch

[yocto] [PATCH] [yocto-ab-helper] config-intelqa-x86_64-lava.json: Update job-config to enable BSP on Minnowboard (x86_64)

This patch is to update the nightly-x86-64-bsp job configuration and include the TEST_TARGET_IP, TEST_SERVER_IP & TEST_SUITES to enable OEQA Automated BSP test case(s) using server client connection. Signed-off-by: Aaron Chan --- config-intelqa-x86_64-lava.json | 17 ++--- 1 file cha

Re: [yocto] Writing a recipe that allows for extra depends, depending on the extra_oemake configurations

On 12 July 2018 at 23:12, Giordon Stark wrote: > Hi Ross, > > Thanks. I saw that but the documentation doesn't explicitly mentioned > EXTRA_OEMAKE. Is that the same as EXTRA_OECONF? EXTRA_OEMAKE is what is passed to 'make' calls. Your recipe is using cmake, so you're extending EXTRA_OECMAKE, whi

Re: [yocto] [layerindex-web] RFC: layer index docker fixes

On Thursday, 12 July 2018 10:16:12 PM CEST you wrote: > I just noticed that the image doesn't contain git. Was this > deliberate or an oversight? Ah, no, it wasn't deliberate - perhaps it was there earlier with buildpack- deps? It doesn't appear that we ever explicitly had it in there. I've added