My system has a USB-SSD drive and I added this to my fstab:
/dev/sda1 /mnt/driveauto defaults,nonempty 0 0
But it doesn't get mounted on start-up. I can use "mount -a" after
start-up and it mounts successfully.
Everything else in fstab gets mounted on boot. Does anyone know why
my new e
Thank you. This worked!
From: Giordon Stark
Sent: Wednesday, January 3, 2018 4:45:59 PM
To: Matt Schepers
Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org
Subject: Re: [yocto] recipe for custom python package not on pypi
Hi,
https://github.com/kratsg/meta-l1calo/blob/master/r
On 01/05/2018 06:41 PM, Matt Schepers wrote:
This does not install "python3-modules" to the image. When this builds, my
python program does not work because of missing dependencies on the standard library.
To get this to work I have to go in and append "python3-modules" to
IMAGE_INSTALL in my
Folks,
I am trying to add users to my rootfs.
When I add this to the image recipe it works:
-
ROOT_PASSWORD = "secret"
IGU_PASSWORD = "secret"
EXTRA_USERS_PARAMS = "\
groupadd igu; \
useradd -p `openssl passwd ${IGU_PASSWORD}` igu; \
Folks,
I have a .bb file for a setuptools based python program I am installing to my
image. The python program needs a large subset of what's available in the
python standard library and therefore I need to install "python3-modules" in my
image to get the python interpreter to work.
This is my
On 01/05/2018 05:06 PM, Kirill Kondrashov wrote:
Thanks for advice, but at the moment it's a bit of a problem, I'm stuck
with poky2.0.3 bound to a specific board, so I will keep up with smart.
But what's the benefit of dnf?
Talk to the provider of the BSP layer, and ask why you need to be stuc
On 12/28/2017 01:37 PM, Kirill Kondrashov wrote:
Is there some existing C/C++ API for smart pm? I have to interface it
from Qt software and wonder if there's some other way rather then just
intercepting python scripts output.
Upgrade to a recent yocto release, which has replaced dnf with smart
Hi Ee Peng,
That failure was not expected but as it is a known issue we should
proceed to QA M1 rc3.
Please do initialise QA for this rc3.
Thank you,
Joshua
On 05/01/18 00:54, Yeoh, Ee Peng wrote:
Hi Joshua,
I noticed for 2.5 M1 rc3, nightly-x86 failed during testimage (Sanity Test),
due
Hi Richard,
We had configured GDC Fedora Performance Machine to run 2.4 M4 rc3 [1].
Based on the new performance data we collected, the average time for eSDK
deploy is 237 seconds (3 min 57 sec). In comparison, data collected WW43 2017,
the average time for eSDK deploy was 161 seconds (2 min
