Re: [yocto] linux-firmware: build failure

2017-11-01 Thread Craig McQueen
Alexander Kanavin wrote: > On 10/31/2017 09:04 AM, Craig McQueen wrote: > > Would the following be a suitable fix? -- > > This needs to go to oe-core list. Just one comment... > > > # Remove python script used to check the WHENCE file > > - rm ${D}${nonarch_base_libdir}/firmware/ch

Re: [yocto] Checking for xwayland

2017-11-01 Thread Adam Lee
Ah, meta-arago sets PACCKAGECONFIG_pn-weston without xwayland. PACKAGECONFIG_pn-weston = "egl kms launch clients" On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 5:26 PM Adam Lee wrote: > Hi Raj, > > These are my DISTRO_FEATURES: > > DISTRO_FEATURES="alsa argp bluetooth ext2 irda largefile pcmcia usbgadget > usbhost wi

Re: [yocto] Checking for xwayland

2017-11-01 Thread Adam Lee
Hi Raj, These are my DISTRO_FEATURES: DISTRO_FEATURES="alsa argp bluetooth ext2 irda largefile pcmcia usbgadget usbhost wifi xattr nfs zeroconf pci 3g nfc *x11 *ipv4 ipv6 libc-backtrace libc-big-macros libc-bsd libc-cxx-tests libc-catgets libc-charsets libc-crypt

Re: [yocto] Checking for xwayland

2017-11-01 Thread Khem Raj
On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 2:03 PM, Adam Lee wrote: > I believe something is incorrect in my distro level configuration. Apart > from including x11 and wayland in DISTRO_FEATURES, what else can I check to > build core-image-weston? > > build@6e35408e8fa5:~/tisdk/build$ bitbake core-image-weston > NOTE

Re: [yocto] Checking for xwayland

2017-11-01 Thread Adam Lee
I believe something is incorrect in my distro level configuration. Apart from including x11 and wayland in DISTRO_FEATURES, what else can I check to build core-image-weston? build@6e35408e8fa5:~/tisdk/build$ bitbake core-image-weston NOTE: Started PRServer with DBfile: /home/build/tisdk/build/cach

Re: [yocto] Debugging a build issue in an isolated enviroment

2017-11-01 Thread Alex Kiernan
On 1 November 2017 at 17:38, Alan Martinovic wrote: > I'm just upgrading to pyro and have some issues with u-boot-fw-utils. > > The error fails at do_compile stage which looks like this: > > do_compile () { > oe_runmake ${UBOOT_MACHINE} > oe_runmake env > } > > > T

Re: [yocto] Debugging a build issue in an isolated enviroment

2017-11-01 Thread Burton, Ross
On 1 November 2017 at 17:38, Alan Martinovic wrote: > Is there a way to run the above listed make command with the same > environment as it is run when the error is produced? > $ bitbake -c devshell This drops you in a new terminal with the same environment that bitbake sets up, and in ../temp

[yocto] Debugging a build issue in an isolated enviroment

2017-11-01 Thread Alan Martinovic
I'm just upgrading to pyro and have some issues with u-boot-fw-utils. The error fails at do_compile stage which looks like this: do_compile () { oe_runmake ${UBOOT_MACHINE} oe_runmake env } The error is: Log data follows: | DEBUG: Executing shell function do_com

Re: [yocto] Slightly varying builds

2017-11-01 Thread Alexander Kanavin
On 11/01/2017 06:43 PM, colin.helliw...@ln-systems.com wrote: I need to build two slightly varying versions of our Yocto build – one for the production units and one for development. They differ in only a few ways – the kernel and apps are the same. But one has Dropbear, whilst the other doesn

Re: [yocto] Checking for xwayland

2017-11-01 Thread Burton, Ross
On 1 November 2017 at 15:58, Adam Lee wrote: > Thanks Fabien, I definitely don't have Xwayland in my rootfs. My manifest > is missing xserver-xorg-xwayland as well. > > Which image are you using? I thought including of "x11 wayland" was > sufficient. Perhaps not..? > > Are you refering to DISTRO

[yocto] Slightly varying builds

2017-11-01 Thread colin.helliwell
I need to build two slightly varying versions of our Yocto build - one for the production units and one for development. They differ in only a few ways - the kernel and apps are the same. But one has Dropbear, whilst the other doesn't; and the U-Boot configs & patches are different. I'm wonder

Re: [yocto] Checking for xwayland

2017-11-01 Thread Adam Lee
Thank you I will check out core-image-weston. On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 12:01 PM Fabien Lahoudere < fabien.lahoud...@collabora.co.uk> wrote: > On Wed, 2017-11-01 at 15:58 +, Adam Lee wrote: > > Thanks Fabien, I definitely don't have Xwayland in my rootfs. My > manifest is missing xserver-xorg- >

Re: [yocto] Checking for xwayland

2017-11-01 Thread Fabien Lahoudere
On Wed, 2017-11-01 at 15:58 +, Adam Lee wrote: > Thanks Fabien, I definitely don't have Xwayland in my rootfs. My manifest is > missing xserver-xorg- > xwayland as well. > > Which image are you using? I thought including of  "x11 wayland" was > sufficient. Perhaps not..? > The image I buil

Re: [yocto] Checking for xwayland

2017-11-01 Thread Adam Lee
Thanks Fabien, I definitely don't have Xwayland in my rootfs. My manifest is missing xserver-xorg-xwayland as well. Which image are you using? I thought including of "x11 wayland" was sufficient. Perhaps not..? Adam On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 10:28 AM Fabien Lahoudere < fabien.lahoud...@collabora.c

Re: [yocto] [Yocto] Checking sstate mirror is hanging at 100%

2017-11-01 Thread Vineeth Chowdary Karumanchi
On 11/1/2017 12:11 AM, Andre McCurdy wrote: The fetcher explicitly tries to avoid that by retrying each file only once. See retry logic in: http://git.openembedded.org/bitbake/commit/?id=54b1961551511948e0cbd2ac39f19b39b9cee568 However, there is a later commit which may also be related:

Re: [yocto] Checking for xwayland

2017-11-01 Thread Fabien Lahoudere
On Wed, 2017-11-01 at 14:10 +, Adam Lee wrote: > Hello, how do I tell if I successfully built xwayland into my image? > > I looked for "xwayland" binary but to no avail. I have this /usr/bin/Xwayland in my rootfs. Check you manifest. It should contain xserver-xorg-xwayland. > > Adam -- Fa

[yocto] Checking for xwayland

2017-11-01 Thread Adam Lee
Hello, how do I tell if I successfully built xwayland into my image? I looked for "xwayland" binary but to no avail. Adam -- ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto

Re: [yocto] pseudo - few general questions

2017-11-01 Thread Mark Hatle
On 11/1/17 8:49 AM, Mark Hatle wrote: > On 11/1/17 4:17 AM, Pavlina Varekova wrote: >> Hi, >> thank you very much. It sounds good. So I tried replace fakechroot with >> pseudo. >> I read man pages and replace: >> >> FAKECHROOT_BASE="${DIR1}" fakechroot  command >> >> with: >> >> %{PATH/TO/PSEUDO/}

Re: [yocto] pseudo - few general questions

2017-11-01 Thread Mark Hatle
On 11/1/17 4:17 AM, Pavlina Varekova wrote: > Hi, > thank you very much. It sounds good. So I tried replace fakechroot with > pseudo. > I read man pages and replace: > > FAKECHROOT_BASE="${DIR1}" fakechroot  command > > with: > > %{PATH/TO/PSEUDO/}bin/pseudo  -r "${DIR1}" -P %{PATH/TO/PSEUDO/}

[yocto] [meta-security][PATCH] trousers: allow overriding localstatedir mandir sysconfdir

2017-11-01 Thread André Draszik
From: André Draszik It is currently impossible to override localstatedir, mandir and sysconfdir during ./configure, because they are being overriden unconditionally. With this patch it is now possible to set above locations as needed. Signed-off-by: André Draszik --- ...-override-localstatedi

[yocto] [meta-security][PATCH] trousers: make initscript more reliable

2017-11-01 Thread André Draszik
From: André Draszik The combination of using start-stop-daemon and pidof is not working reliably in all cases. Sometimes, the tcsd daemon isn't running yet at the time pidof is being invoked. This results in an empty /var/run/tcsd.pid, making it impossible to stop tcsd using the init script. To

Re: [yocto] pseudo - few general questions

2017-11-01 Thread Pavlina Varekova
Hi, thank you very much. It sounds good. So I tried replace fakechroot with pseudo. I read man pages and replace: FAKECHROOT_BASE="${DIR1}" fakechroot  command with: %{PATH/TO/PSEUDO/}bin/pseudo  -r "${DIR1}" -P %{PATH/TO/PSEUDO/} command But it does not work good. Probably some variable is se