I took a functioning 32-bit x86 system built with Morty and successfully
converted it to 64-bit. Builds and runs fine. Next, I tried applying the
x32 tune, as described in the Yocto manual. I created another BSP layer,
changed all the names accordingly, set CONFIG_64BIT=y and CONFIG_X86_X32=y
in on
Hello All,
Here is the report for the 2.2.2 rc1 full point release test cycle.
Full Report :
https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/WW22_-_2017-06-05_-_Full_Point_Release_Test_Cycle_2.2.2_rc1
Summary
The QA cycle for release 2.2.2 rc1 is complete, there were 6 new issue
On 06/04/2017 12:30 AM, Gary Thomas wrote:
>> Which version of opkg are you using? do you have the libsolv backend
>> enabled? running opkg --version should tell you the opkg version and the
>> libsolv version, if the backend is enabled.
>
> # opkg --version
> opkg version 0.3.4 (libsolv 0.6.27)
Tuesday, June 6, 2017 8:00 AM US Pacific Time
Agenda:
* Opens collection - 5 min (Stephen)
* Yocto Project status - 5 min (Stephen/team)
https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Yocto_Project_v2.3_Status
https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Yocto_2.3_Schedule
https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Yo
Khem,
Fully agree that Yocto has is good, 'cause it supports cross-build, has a wide
industry support and actually it has **the version** (meaning, all the packages
are taken with specific git commit id unlike debian/ubuntu binaries).
But then, I'm confused in the other respect...
I'm looki
Current Dev Position: Preparing for YP 2.4 M1
Next Deadline: YP 2.4 M1 Cut off is June 12, 2017
SWAT team rotation: Anibal -> Todor on June 2, 2017.
SWAT team rotation: Todor -> Alejandro on June 9, 2017.
https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Yocto_Build_Failure_Swat_Team
Key Status/Updates:
·
