On 12/08/2016 05:06 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> On 2016-12-08 09:06 AM, Bent Bisballe Nyeng wrote:
>> Hi list
>>
>> I am working on a project based on the iMX6UL-EVK using the meta-fsl-arm
>> layer for the kernel.
>> In a local layer I have a bbappend recipe containing a patch for an
>> extra kerne
Thanks for your answer. I'll keep things as they are then.
From: Paul Eggleton
Sent: Thursday, December 8, 2016 9:59 PM
To: Rafael Gago Castano
Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org
Subject: Re: [yocto] libssp_nonshared.a not present in native SDK.
Hi Rafael,
On Thu, 08 D
A release candidate build for yocto-2.0.3.rc6 is now available at:
http://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/pub/releases/yocto-2.0.3.rc6
Please begin QA on this build as soon as possible.
Build hash information:
meta-qt4 : 2c7f8df9039be498f8a2232d1428adb7f4e5e800
meta-intel : 28c774bf25eec4
From: Mirza Krak
U-boot has been updated to 2016.11 in OE-core Which means that we can
use the upstream patches instead of the backports and no need for the third
patch which causes a build error when used with 2016.11.
Signed-off-by: Mirza Krak
---
...0001-arm-add-save_boot_params-for-ARM1176
2016-12-05 23:07 GMT+01:00 Khem Raj :
>
>> On Dec 5, 2016, at 1:46 PM, Mirza Krak wrote:
>>
>> 2016-12-05 19:37 GMT+01:00 Khem Raj :
>>> On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 7:26 AM, Mirza Krak wrote:
Hi.
I have some questions and remarks and hopefully someone here can answer
them.
>>
Hi Rafael,
On Thu, 08 Dec 2016 16:05:04 Rafael Gago Castano wrote:
> Yesterday, when cross-compiling with the SDK (relocatable/non-extensible), I
> noticed that CMake projects weren't generated because the compiler feature
> detection was failing. CMake enables fstack-protector for each of its
> p
I'm on poky/dizzy and I'm getting a segementation fault in my application that
I think may be related to a buffer overflow. I'm using the Eclipse plug-in (on
Eclipse Kepler) to debug on the hardware with GDB. I'm trying to enable
reverse debugging but I have not had any success and I'm looking
Hello,
is there a way to add some extra space to the rootfs in a vmdk image? It looks
like the option IMAGE_ROOTFS_EXTRA_SPACE is only used by image.bbclass, but not
by image-vm.bbclass.
Kind regards
Christian Andersen
KOSTAL Industrie Elektrik GmbH - Sitz Lüdenscheid, Registergericht Iserloh
In order for the build slaves to process the "deploy artifacts"
property, it needs to be passed in when the builds are triggered.
This fixes [YOCTO 10229]
Signed-off-by: Stephano Cetola
---
buildset-config.controller/nightly.conf | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --g
Hello!
We are using krogoth for generating our images.
Yesterday, when cross-compiling with the SDK (relocatable/non-extensible), I
noticed that CMake projects weren't generated because the compiler feature
detection was failing. CMake enables fstack-protector for each of its platform
tests an
Due to a recently changes on OEQA framework now uses the Bitbake logger
within a task there are no way to enable verbose.
Signed-off-by: Aníbal Limón
---
.../site-packages/autobuilder/buildsteps/RunESDKSanityTests.py| 2 +-
.../site-packages/autobuilder/buildsteps/RunSDKSanityTests.py
Hello!
We are using krogoth for generating our images.
Yesterday, when cross-compiling with the SDK (relocatable/non-extensible), I
noticed that CMake projects weren't generated because the compiler feature
detection was failing. CMake enables fstack-protector for each of its platform
tests an
On 2016-12-08 09:06 AM, Bent Bisballe Nyeng wrote:
Hi list
I am working on a project based on the iMX6UL-EVK using the meta-fsl-arm
layer for the kernel.
In a local layer I have a bbappend recipe containing a patch for an
extra kernel feature (a framebuffer device) in that kernel as well as a
.c
Hi list
I am working on a project based on the iMX6UL-EVK using the meta-fsl-arm
layer for the kernel.
In a local layer I have a bbappend recipe containing a patch for an
extra kernel feature (a framebuffer device) in that kernel as well as a
.cfg enabling said feature.
The bbappend recipe is loca
On 8 December 2016 at 13:03, wrote:
> I’m creating a recipe for a 3rd party package.
>
> Part of its install is to create the target’s config file by running
> *itself* - obviously this doesn’t work as the target cpu is different to
> the host.
>
> I should be able to do a simple patch to alter t
I'm creating a recipe for a 3rd party package.
Part of its install is to create the target's config file by running
*itself* - obviously this doesn't work as the target cpu is different to the
host.
I should be able to do a simple patch to alter the executable that the
Makefile runs to generate
Explained creation of wic partitioned images using oe
build system. This way is preferable as it's more natural and
easier to use and understand than currently documented way of
using wic as a stand-alone tool.
Signed-off-by: Ed Bartosh
---
.../dev-manual/dev-manual-common-tasks.xml | 18
Signed-off-by: Ed Bartosh
---
documentation/ref-manual/ref-variables.xml | 14 ++
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
diff --git a/documentation/ref-manual/ref-variables.xml
b/documentation/ref-manual/ref-variables.xml
index af1ed84..aa18bd6 100644
--- a/documentation/ref-manual/ref-va
* no more required (version > 3.17 | > 4.3.x | > 4.4.5)
* causes error with rt kernel
Signed-off-by: Andreas Müller
---
classes/linux-raspberrypi-base.bbclass | 15 ---
1 file changed, 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/classes/linux-raspberrypi-base.bbclass
b/classes/linux-raspberrypi-b
19 matches
Mail list logo
