Re: [yocto] do_patch through Yocto fails while "git am" succeed

On 10 June 2016 at 19:12, Michael Hu wrote: > What could be the difference? > bitbake uses quilt to apply patches, not git am, so if the patch isn't exactly right then they'll behave differently. Stripping the trailing CRs would be a start. Ross --

Re: [yocto] [PULL] fixes in Dependency Explorer

Yeah, sure. I will send them on Monday. Thanks! Kind regards, Bartosz Woronicz Engineer, Software Configuration (SCM) Nokia Networks - PL/Wroclaw On 10.06.2016 13:58, Burton, Ross wrote: Hi Bartosz, Please can you re-send these to the bitbake list? Thanks, Ross On 7 June 2016 at 16:15, Woron

[yocto] do_patch through Yocto fails while "git am" succeed

Does anyone know what's the difference between using Yocto to apply patches and apply patch directly using git command? I am trying to apply patches for arm-trusted-firmware through yocto by extending arm-trusted-firmware.bb file, in .bbappend file, I have: SRC_URI = "file://" I got the followin

[yocto] Yocto Project Status WW24

Current Dev Position: YP 2.2 M1 Next Deadline: YP 2.2 cut off: June 13, 2016 [3 days - Monday!] SWAT team rotation: Jussi -> Maxim https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Yocto_Build_Failure_Swat_Team Key Status/Updates: *We continue to see various python v3 issues however these are on th

[yocto] Handling of partial Yocto image updates

Hello, I would like to ask the community what is the preferred way of handling partial image / package updates using Yocto, once an image has been deployed to a production system? In most cases, once we have an image deployed it might be necessary to update some individual packages and e.g.,

Re: [yocto] [PULL] fixes in Dependency Explorer

Hi Bartosz, Please can you re-send these to the bitbake list? Thanks, Ross On 7 June 2016 at 16:15, Woronicz, Bartosz ( NSN - PL/Wroclaw) < bartosz.woron...@nokia.com> wrote: > > -- > Kind regards, > Bartosz Woronicz > Engineer, Software Configuration (SCM) > Nokia Networks - PL/Wroclaw > > > -

Re: [yocto] Another python3 error?

On 10 June 2016 at 06:54, Maxin B. John wrote: > > Had the same experience. We need to modify depexp.py to support python3: > > http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/log/?h=maxin/depexp > ( Please note that this is a work in progress ) > Ah my plan to leave it until someone else

Re: [yocto] Another python3 error?

Hi Gary, On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 12:06:15PM +0200, Gary Thomas wrote: > On 2016-06-10 10:42, Burton, Ross wrote: > > > >On 10 June 2016 at 09:39, Gary Thomas >> wrote: > > > >Any hints on which (and why it's not being recommended by the sanity > > checker)? > > > >

[yocto] Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Problems with do_rootfs when changing the user password

Hej Maxin, Great Idea - The wiki was my starting point. By the way there is no "usermod -P". I can tell only for my self, but I like the meta-skeleton section. A working example is better than 10 e-mails. From my Yocto newbee view I would prefer some simple lean recipes as templates(or reverse

Re: [yocto] Another python3 error?

On 10 June 2016 at 11:06, Gary Thomas wrote: > bitbake -u depexp used to work on this same system before the change over > to > python3 in bitbake. > Sorry I meant python3 :) Ross -- ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctopr

Re: [yocto] Another python3 error?

On 2016-06-10 10:42, Burton, Ross wrote: On 10 June 2016 at 09:39, Gary Thomas mailto:g...@mlbassoc.com>> wrote: Any hints on which (and why it's not being recommended by the sanity checker)? It's not recommended by the sanity checker because its only needed by depexp and on a X11-less

Re: [yocto] Antwort: Re: Problems with do_rootfs when changing the user password

Hi, On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 05:17:33PM +0200, s.jar...@esa-grimma.de wrote: > >Hej > >Thanks for the infos. I figured out that the common tutorial under >meta-skeleton >does not covers the change of the root password. Although "usermod -P" does >not exits. >Now the "usermod -p" wants a encrypted

Re: [yocto] Another python3 error?

On 10 June 2016 at 09:39, Gary Thomas wrote: > Any hints on which (and why it's not being recommended by the sanity > checker)? > It's not recommended by the sanity checker because its only needed by depexp and on a X11-less build server will pull in vast numbers of packages. It's the python2 G

Re: [yocto] Another python3 error?

On 2016-06-10 10:33, Gary Thomas wrote: BB_VERSION= "1.31.0" BUILD_SYS = "x86_64-linux" NATIVELSBSTRING = "Ubuntu-15.10" meta = "master:40e789d1fee7f0df2d23230fff38325119ad2935" $ bitbake my-demo-image -g -u depexp Traceback (most recent call last): File "/local

Re: [yocto] Another python3 error?

On 10 June 2016 at 09:33, Gary Thomas wrote: > bitbake -g by itself works fine. Is this a [new] issue with my > build host, or just the change over to python3? > That's missing packages on your build host. Ross -- ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctop

[yocto] Another python3 error?

BB_VERSION= "1.31.0" BUILD_SYS = "x86_64-linux" NATIVELSBSTRING = "Ubuntu-15.10" meta = "master:40e789d1fee7f0df2d23230fff38325119ad2935" $ bitbake my-demo-image -g -u depexp Traceback (most recent call last): File "/local/poky-cutting-edge/bitbake/bin/bitbake", l