LDFLAGS are not taken from environment and CFLAGS is used for LDFLAGS
however when using security options -fpie and -pie options are coming
as part of ARCH_FLAGS and they get into LDFLAGS of shared objects as
well so we end up with conflicting options -shared -pie, which gold
rejects outright and b
-e
A release candidate build for yocto-2.1_M2.rc3 is now available at:
http://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/pub/releases/yocto-2.1_M2.rc3
Please begin QA on this build as soon as possible.
Build hash information:
meta-intel : 5640cd6bc13a520ba4bf73c94fe9b739ac23c7e6
meta-fsl-arm : 3848dc0c
fixed WARNING: QA Issue: /usr/bin/ndiff_nmap contained in package nmap requires
/usr/bin/python2.7, but no providers found in its RDEPENDS [file-rdeps]
Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster
---
recipes-security/nmap/{nmap_7.00.bb => nmap_7.01.bb} | 8 ++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions
A release candidate build for yocto-2.1_M2.rc2 is now available at:
http://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/pub/releases/yocto-2.1_M2.rc2
Please begin QA on this build as soon as possible.
Build hash information:
meta-intel : 5640cd6bc13a520ba4bf73c94fe9b739ac23c7e6
meta-fsl-arm : 3848dc0cb4a
removed patch no longer needded.
LIC_FILES_CHKSUM changed do to copyright date updates.
Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster
---
.../suricata/files/no_pcap_pkgconf_check.patch | 26 --
recipes-security/suricata/libhtp_0.5.18.bb | 2 +-
recipes-security/suricata/suricata.i
On 16 February 2016 at 09:03, wrote:
> It seems to be insufficient to add mtd-utils to a packagegroup[1] and add
> this to the image for it to be installed in the image.
> The package is being built and I can install it afterwards e.g. opkg
> install mtd-utils-ubifs_1.5.1+git0+9f107132a6-r0_armv7
Hi,
I would like to have ubi-utils, which is part of mtd-utils, installed on
my target.
It seems to be insufficient to add mtd-utils to a packagegroup[1] and
add this to the image for it to be installed in the image.
The package is being built and I can install it afterwards e.g. opkg
instal
On Thursday 11 Feb 2016 14:32:50 Burton, Ross wrote:
> On 11 February 2016 at 14:21, Nick Leverton wrote:
> > Possibly a little early - Debian 7 will be going onto LTS security support
> > for
> > two years, starting some time this month. Quoting from
> > https://wiki.debian.org/LTS
>
> Ah yes,
