while intel's cedartrail BSP was removed back in 2013, it's still
used as an example in the explanation of the KMACHINE variable in the
variable glossary:
http://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/latest/ref-manual/ref-manual.html#var-KMACHINE
someone might want to swap in a current example for that.
From: Philip Tricca
BBFILE_COLLECTIONS for meta-virtualization is 'virtualization-layer'.
This is required to get lxc bbappend working when meta-virtualization is
added to bblayers.conf.
Signed-off-by: Philip Tricca
---
meta-virtualization/recipes-containers/lxc/lxc_%.bbappend |1 -
virtu
On 03/02/2015 07:16 PM, recipe-rep...@yoctoproject.org wrote:
python-git0.3.60.3/ Robert Yang
It there anything wrong with the reporting system, please ? Please see
the "0.3/".
// Robert
--
___
yocto mailing lis
A release candidate build for yocto-1.8_M3.rc3 is now available at:
http://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/pub/releases/yocto-1.8_M3.rc3
Please begin QA on this build as soon as possible.
Build hash information:
meta-intel : 367fd4758d23318b3adab8021d7bdc8b56e04917
meta-fsl-arm : 5d8185213b3
Applied... thanks.
>-Original Message-
>From: yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto-
>boun...@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Robert P. J. Day
>Sent: Monday, March 02, 2015 11:46 PM
>To: Yocto discussion list
>Subject: [yocto] [PATCH] Documentation: Ref Manual, fill out missing
>mach
Yes - correct. I switched out fri2 with emenlow.
Scott
>-Original Message-
>From: yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto-
>boun...@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Robert P. J. Day
>Sent: Monday, March 02, 2015 12:08 PM
>To: Yocto discussion list
>Subject: [yocto] kernel dev manual
Robert,
I talked with Bruce on this and determined that we can update that first string
with the second.
Thanks,
Scott
>-Original Message-
>From: yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto-
>boun...@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Robert P. J. Day
>Sent: Monday, March 02, 2015 10:1
Try doing:
${CC} test.c
This will invoke the cross compiler with all the compilation flags required to
produce
an executable for the target, using libraries on the target root file system.
From: Raghavendra Kakarla [raghavendra.kaka...@inedasystems.com
On Tue, 3 Mar 2015, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
... snip ...
> This format: KERNEL_FEATURES="features/netfilter"
>
> Is the historical remnant. The tools can convert that to
> features/netfilter/netfiler.scc internally. It was a shortcut to
> make the features more human readable when they followed th
On Tue, 3 Mar 2015, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> On 15-03-03 05:39 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > On Tue, 3 Mar 2015, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >kernel dev manual uses the KERNEL_FEATURES format of:
> > >
> > > KERNEL_FEATURES += "features/netfilter.scc"
> > >
> > > while ref man
On 15-03-03 11:27 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
On Tue, 3 Mar 2015, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 15-03-03 05:39 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
On Tue, 3 Mar 2015, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
kernel dev manual uses the KERNEL_FEATURES format of:
KERNEL_FEATURES += "features/netfilter.scc"
wh
On 15-03-03 08:32 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
kernel dev manual, section 3.4.1, claims:
"The simplest unit of kernel Metadata is the configuration-only
feature. This feature consists of one or more Linux kernel
configuration parameters in a configuration fragment file (.cfg) and a
.scc file
On 15-03-03 05:39 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
On Tue, 3 Mar 2015, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
kernel dev manual uses the KERNEL_FEATURES format of:
KERNEL_FEATURES += "features/netfilter.scc"
while ref manual variable glossary uses
KERNEL_FEATURES="features/netfilter"
is there a
Problem in remove /etc/snmp/snmpd.conf and create link symbolic to ln -sf
/app/etc/snmpd.conf /etc/snmp/snmpd.conf
Build error:
Collected errors:
* check_data_file_clashes: Package ideale wants to install file
/home/bueno/yocto/proj-bbb-2015-vter/tmp/work/beaglebone-poky-linux-gnueabi/vter2015/
kernel dev manual, section 3.4.1, claims:
"The simplest unit of kernel Metadata is the configuration-only
feature. This feature consists of one or more Linux kernel
configuration parameters in a configuration fragment file (.cfg) and a
.scc file that describes the fragment."
that pretty clea
Maybe, it depends on the individual projects. We haven't embarked upon any
documentation standardisation effort.
On Tuesday 03 March 2015 12:17:45 Raghavendra Kakarla wrote:
> Hi Paul Eggleton,
>
> Shall i get any API information in the generated SDK documents.
>
> Regards,
> Raghavendra.
> ___
Hi Paul Eggleton,
Shall i get any API information in the generated SDK documents.
Regards,
Raghavendra.
From: Paul Eggleton
Sent: Tuesday, March 3, 2015 5:40 PM
To: Raghavendra Kakarla
Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org
Subject: Re: SDK generation issue
Assuming
Assuming you built the SDK you had installed with "doc-pkgs" in
SDKIMAGE_FEATURES, they would be in the target sysroot i.e.
/sysroots//usr/share/doc/
On Tuesday 03 March 2015 11:55:22 Raghavendra Kakarla wrote:
> Hi Paul Eggleton,
>
> Where can i get the documents generated by the yocto sdk.
>
Hi Paul Eggleton,
Where can i get the documents generated by the yocto sdk.
Regards,
Raghavendra.
From: Raghavendra Kakarla
Sent: Tuesday, March 3, 2015 3:56 PM
To: Paul Eggleton
Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org
Subject: RE: SDK generation issue
Hi Paul Eggleto
On Tue, 3 Mar 2015, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
> kernel dev manual uses the KERNEL_FEATURES format of:
>
> KERNEL_FEATURES += "features/netfilter.scc"
>
> while ref manual variable glossary uses
>
> KERNEL_FEATURES="features/netfilter"
>
> is there a preference for the usage of the .scc
On Tuesday 03 March 2015 10:26:46 Raghavendra Kakarla wrote:
> When i Built SDK for YOCTO, I am getting a cross compilation tool chain.
> With which i am able to build the applications for my platform. I wanted to
> confirm, whether SDK means a toolchain to build the applications or is
> there som
Hi Paul Eggleton,
Thank you for your response.
Now my issue is resolved.
I have some doubts on yocto-sdk. Can you please clarify them.
When i Built SDK for YOCTO, I am getting a cross compilation tool chain. With
which i am able to build the applications for my platform. I wanted to confirm,
On Tuesday 03 March 2015 05:41:43 Raghavendra Kakarla wrote:
> I am generated the yocto SDK using the yocto sdk script "bitbake
> core-image-minimal -c populate_sdk" command. With this command I am able to
> generte the installation script file and .manifest file.
>
> I run the installation script
kernel dev manual uses the KERNEL_FEATURES format of:
KERNEL_FEATURES += "features/netfilter.scc"
while ref manual variable glossary uses
KERNEL_FEATURES="features/netfilter"
is there a preference for the usage of the .scc suffix? (i'm assuming
they're both valid, i didn't actually
Hi Yocto,
For the record the issue is in current dizzy branch and occurs when using
systemd and udev along with udev-extraconf mount scripts.
By default, systemd-udevd.service has the option MountFlags=slave,
which means that mounts are only seen by udevd process.
This explains some weird behavior
Hi all,
As some of you might know through IRC and the mailing list itself, I'm trying
to get LLVM/CLang to work in Yocto in platforms other than x64 multilib. To set
the purpose of this email clear, I am only trying to get LLVM to work as
host-only compiler. As much as I want to get LLVM cross
26 matches
Mail list logo
