[yocto] [meta-selinux][PATCH] libcap-ng: CVE-2014-3215

From: Shan Hai seunshare in policycoreutils 2.2.5 is owned by root with 4755 permissions, and executes programs in a way that changes the relationship between the setuid system call and the getresuid saved set-user-ID value, which makes it easier for local users to gain privileges by leveraging a

[yocto] Yocto Bitbake Error - rmp-native task failure

I gave bitbake for imx6qsabreauto command used bitbake -v tizen-common-core-image-minimal-dev below is the error section from the log + patch -p0 patch: Can't create file /tmp/tmpT3pUSD/poMZnbmM : No such file or directory + bb_exit_handler + ret=2 + echo WARNING: exit code 2 from a sh

[yocto] Weekly build now available

http://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/pub/nightly/20140722-2 Unknown bitbake 8fbffd25d42f1f2d9a85ae1d9cc4852e835730d4 eclipse-poky-juno 26bfc407781aa185f244a47ba63120343cee4a37 eclipse-poky-kepler 4a167fd662262ebdaa3cf0d332ac0debb52d7904 meta-fsl-arm d900d935e1f45a79c7116c4fd290baaa447a870d meta

[yocto] SDK not contianing archive libraries

Good day, I have bumped into a problem when compiling from my generated SDK (-c populate_sdk). I have archive libraries (.a) that were not reflected in my SDK's lib dir in sysroots. However, my shared objects (.so) are present. I needed both .a and .so to be present in my SDK. With the former bein

[yocto] [ANNOUNCEMENT] Yocto Project 1.7 Milestone 1 now available

The first milestone for the upcoming 1.7 release is now available at: http://downloads.yoctoproject.org/releases/yocto/milestones/yocto-1.7_M1 poky a5531a2b8983318b99c119a87b78a92cf84160b8 meta-qt3 3016129d90b7ac8517a5227d819f10ad417b5b45 eclipse-poky-juno 26bfc407781aa185f244a47ba63120343cee4a37

Re: [yocto] SELinux doesn't work on t4240qds

Hi Mark, Thanks for your comments. > -Original Message- > From: yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto- > boun...@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Mark Hatle > > On 7/22/14, 10:11 AM, zhenhua@freescale.com wrote: > > Hi all, > > Which release are you using. [Luo Zhenhua-B1953

[yocto] [Yocto 1.6] PAM _pam_load_conf_file: unable to open /etc/pam.d/system-auth

Hi, Just trying to found what's missing for PAM to work so ssh will stop exiting with Broken pipe? Quick fix to solve ssh broken pipe is to change in /etc/ssh/sshd_config "UsePAM yes" to "UsePAM no". But this does not remove my PAM error? Here the log for PAM: root@ka:~$ journalctl | grep -i PAM

[yocto] why does meta-yocto prepend to BBPATH, while meta-yocto-bsp appends?

i know i asked this way back when but i forget the answer -- why does meta-yocto layer.conf prepend to BBPATH: BBPATH =. "${LAYERDIR}:" while meta-yocto-bsp appends: BBPATH .= ":${LAYERDIR}" rday -- Robert P. J.

Re: [yocto] read only rootfs & systemd

On wto, 2014-07-22 at 08:44 -0700, Christopher Larson wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 4:43 AM, Maciek Borzecki > wrote: > Is read-only-rootfs supported on systemd setups? > > The current dev manual is not clear about this. Also in > image.bbclass > ther

Re: [yocto] [OE-core] Carrier Grade layer proposal

On 14-07-22 01:21 PM, Alexandru Vaduva wrote: Hello Bruce, What I understand from your mail you suggest using the already available linux-yocto tree. As an answer to this let me assure that as much as possible the meta-cgl layer will try to do that. If that will not be the case I will let the

Re: [yocto] Fwd: How to find the bb file from package name

I would like to generalize my last question A yocto PACKAGE, generates an rpm package, with are different names due to an inherited class setting "PKG " variable. When I try to add such a package to "TOOLCHAIN_HOST_TAS

Re: [yocto] SELinux doesn't work on t4240qds

On 7/22/14, 10:11 AM, zhenhua@freescale.com wrote: Hi all, Which release are you using. The last version I used w/ meta-selinux was the 1.5 release. We're planning on updating it to master in the 'near' future [patches welcome!], and I've been told by a few others of success w/ 1.7.

Re: [yocto] [OE-core] Carrier Grade layer proposal

Hello Bruce, What I understand from your mail you suggest using the already available linux-yocto tree. As an answer to this let me assure that as much as possible the meta-cgl layer will try to do that. If that will not be the case I will let the community know that. One such case could be grs

Re: [yocto] Fwd: How to find the bb file from package name

This package (nativesdk-libqt5core-dev-5.2.1-r1.i686_nativesdk.rpm) is not installed in my sdk sysroot. So I need to add it to TOOLCHAIN_HOST_TASK and see if it gets installed into my sdk sysroot But it fails with below error: Error: nativesdk-qtbase-tools-dev not found in the base feeds (i686_nat

Re: [yocto] Fwd: How to find the bb file from package name

Hello Bharath, This is already known to me. The confusion mainly here was because of the name of the rpm package. From the recipe expected name was "nativesdk-qtbase-tools-dev-5.2.1-r1.i686_nativesdk.rpm" but generated package name is "nativesdk-libqt5core-dev-5.2.1-r1.i686_nativesdk.rpm" which co

Re: [yocto] Fwd: How to find the bb file from package name

Hi, you can find it under .inc file here https://github.com/meta-qt5/meta-qt5/blob/daisy/recipes-qt/qt5/nativesdk-qtbase.inc PACKAGES = "${PN}-tools-dbg *${PN}-tools-dev* ${PN}-tools-staticdev ${PN}-tools" Thanks, Bharath On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Anooj Gopi wrote: > > Oh sorry the

Re: [yocto] Fwd: How to find the bb file from package name

On 22 July 2014 17:19, Anooj Gopi wrote: > But I'm still not able to find out where in yocto PKG variable is configured > (which changes this rpm file name from the default one). Packages containing libraries get renamed through debian.bbclass. I'm not sure why you need to know the recipe name f

Re: [yocto] [OE-core] Carrier Grade layer proposal

Glad to hear that Bruce. On Tuesday, July 22, 2014 7:09 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 14-07-22 12:02 PM, akuster wrote: > > On 07/22/2014 08:58 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: >> On 14-07-22 11:54 AM, akuster wrote: >>> Alexandru, >>> >>> Regarding  a few packages in category C&D. >>> >>> I have

Re: [yocto] [OE-core] Carrier Grade layer proposal

OK, thanks for the information and your contribution. I am not opposing to your suggestion but in the same time I believe that this recipe should appear in a properly maintained layer, in the case your layer disappears tomorrow. As you mentioned this information should appear in the mainline met

Re: [yocto] Fwd: How to find the bb file from package name

Oh sorry the link I sent was wrong. The correct one is https://github.com/meta-qt5/meta-qt5/blob/daisy/recipes-qt/qt5/nativesdk-qtbase_5.2.1.bb Manually searching the bb/inc file did not help until this point. Now I enabled the build history (INHERIT += "buildhistory" BUILDHISTORY_FEATURES = "ima

Re: [yocto] [OE-core] Carrier Grade layer proposal

On 07/22/2014 08:58 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 14-07-22 11:54 AM, akuster wrote: Alexandru, Regarding a few packages in category C&D. I have latest samhain building as well as grsecurity (pax patches applied against 3.14.12) in a branch in my meta-security tree. I have a bit more testing t

Re: [yocto] [OE-core] Carrier Grade layer proposal

On 14-07-22 12:02 PM, akuster wrote: On 07/22/2014 08:58 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 14-07-22 11:54 AM, akuster wrote: Alexandru, Regarding a few packages in category C&D. I have latest samhain building as well as grsecurity (pax patches applied against 3.14.12) in a branch in my meta-secu

Re: [yocto] [prelink-cross][PATCH] Always create a conflict for R_ARM_TLS_DESC relocs

Thanks for the patch, I'll get it integrated later today. (What a nasty problem for such a simple fix.) --Mark On 7/22/14, 9:50 AM, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: Hi, This is a bit obscure. In my testing, for the purpose of upstreaming, of the glibc change to support ARM TLS descriptors in preli

Re: [yocto] [OE-core] Carrier Grade layer proposal

On 14-07-22 11:54 AM, akuster wrote: Alexandru, Regarding a few packages in category C&D. I have latest samhain building as well as grsecurity (pax patches applied against 3.14.12) in a branch in my meta-security tree. I have a bit more testing to do before I was going to post them. And on

Re: [yocto] [OE-core] Carrier Grade layer proposal

Alexandru, Regarding a few packages in category C&D. I have latest samhain building as well as grsecurity (pax patches applied against 3.14.12) in a branch in my meta-security tree. I have a bit more testing to do before I was going to post them. grsecurity and samhain aren't CGL specific

Re: [yocto] read only rootfs & systemd

Christopher, Thanks for the information. I too have been looking for this. It seems odd to me that this build system that is designed for an embedded device, doesn't have this feature by default. On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 10:44 AM, Christopher Larson wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 4:43 AM

Re: [yocto] Fwd: How to find the bb file from package name

Hi Anooj, I guess you are looking at a wrong version of the recipe file, you have to look into version number 5.2.1 and revision r1 as your package name is suggesting but the link which you have mentioned is for 5.3.1 . Kindly, have a look into correct version number of recipe file and if you do n

Re: [yocto] read only rootfs & systemd

On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 4:43 AM, Maciek Borzecki < maciej.borze...@open-rnd.pl> wrote: > Is read-only-rootfs supported on systemd setups? > > The current dev manual is not clear about this. Also in image.bbclass > there are comments that read_only_rootfs_hook supports only sysvinit > setups. > No

[yocto] [prelink-cross][PATCH] Always create a conflict for R_ARM_TLS_DESC relocs

Hi, This is a bit obscure. In my testing, for the purpose of upstreaming, of the glibc change to support ARM TLS descriptors in prelinked binaries (cf upstream BZ #17078, https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17078) I have come across a problem where all programs prelinked against g

[yocto] SELinux doesn't work on t4240qds

Hi all, I use the meta-selinux layer to build a core-image-selinux rootfs image, and build kernel with following options enabled. CONFIG_AUDIT=y CONFIG_NETWORK_SECMARK=y CONFIG_EXT2_FS_SECURITY=y CONFIG_EXT3_FS_SECURITY=y CONFIG_EXT4_FS_SECURITY=y CONFIG_JFS_SECURITY=y CONFIG_REISERFS_FS_SECURITY

Re: [yocto] [OE-core] Carrier Grade layer proposal

A quick follow up to the previous e-mail: I only mention that P1 compliance is until November is a best effort approach. This is very much influenced by the community, the available recipes, bugs etc. The CGL compliance is tested against the qemuppc machine, being the fact that a real target is a

Re: [yocto] [OE-core] Carrier Grade layer proposal

Hello again, The P1 compliance until in November is a best effort approach. Regarding the move to the openembedded.org location, we intend to do that as soon as possible after the web page will be put on place, as to make it simple for the community to interact with the layer and have all the n

Re: [yocto] [OE-core] Carrier Grade layer proposal

Hi Alex [RE: [yocto] [OE-core] Carrier Grade layer proposal] On 14.07.22 (Tue 10:52) Alexandru Vaduva wrote: > Hello Joe, > > Here at Enea we are preparing the steps needed for publishing the layer on > the open embedded meta layers initiative: > http://layers.openembedded.org/layerindex/bran

Re: [yocto] rationale for including checkouts in both layers and yocto git repos?

On Tue, 22 Jul 2014, Burton, Ross wrote: > On 22 July 2014 14:15, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > i just noticed that, across the two major repos for yocto: > > > > http://layers.openembedded.org/layerindex/branch/master/layers/ > > http://git.yoctoproject.org/ > > > > there's a wee bit of duplicat

Re: [yocto] rationale for including checkouts in both layers and yocto git repos?

On 22 July 2014 14:15, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > i just noticed that, across the two major repos for yocto: > > http://layers.openembedded.org/layerindex/branch/master/layers/ > http://git.yoctoproject.org/ > > there's a wee bit of duplication in that the second repo above > duplicates a lot of

[yocto] rationale for including checkouts in both layers and yocto git repos?

i just noticed that, across the two major repos for yocto: http://layers.openembedded.org/layerindex/branch/master/layers/ http://git.yoctoproject.org/ there's a wee bit of duplication in that the second repo above duplicates a lot of the meta- layers found in the first location. is that delib

[yocto] [PATCH][autobuilder] buildsteps/RunOeSelftest.py: change the way oe-selftest is called

A recent patch went in poky master that added command line parsing and options to the oe-selftest script. Changing the way oe-selftest is called by the autobuilder to account for these changes. Signed-off-by: Corneliu Stoicescu --- lib/python2.7/site-packages/autobuilder/buildsteps/RunOeSelfte

[yocto] Fwd: How to find the bb file from package name

Yes I am trying to track down the recipe from the rpm file. In my project yocto builds the rpm package "nativesdk-libqt5core-dev-5.2.1-r1.i686_nativesdk.rpm" (by https://github.com/meta-qt5/meta-qt5) but it is not included in my sdk sysroot image. So I would like to see how I could include this int

[yocto] read only rootfs & systemd

Hi, Is read-only-rootfs supported on systemd setups? The current dev manual is not clear about this. Also in image.bbclass there are comments that read_only_rootfs_hook supports only sysvinit setups. Thanks, -- Maciej Borzęcki Senior Software Developer at Open-RnD Sp. z o.o., Poland www.open-rn

Re: [yocto] How to find the bb file from package name

Hello Belen, "Toaster" seems promising. But unfortunately I am currently with Yocto Project 1.5 Do you see any other possibility in 1.5? Best Regards, Anooj On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 11:07 AM, Barros Pena, Belen < belen.barros.p...@intel.com> wrote: > On 21/07/2014 16:39, "Anooj Gopi" wrote: >

Re: [yocto] [OE-core] Carrier Grade layer proposal

Hello Joe, Here at Enea we are preparing the steps needed for publishing the layer on the open embedded meta layers initiative: http://layers.openembedded.org/layerindex/branch/master/layers/ For this we started working at a web page that should contain all the relevant information regarding me

Re: [yocto] How to find the bb file from package name

On 21 July 2014 16:39, Anooj Gopi wrote: > Could some one help me to understand how we could find the bb file which > generated particular package (rpm package for eg.)? > (In some cases the name of the package and recipe name differ drastically) > > Also is there any way to list packages (rpm) ge

Re: [yocto] How to find the bb file from package name

On 21/07/2014 16:39, "Anooj Gopi" wrote: >Hello All, > > >Could some one help me to understand how we could find the bb file which >generated particular package (rpm package for eg.)? > >(In some cases the name of the package and recipe name differ drastically) > > >Also is there any way to list

Re: [yocto] [PATCH] Documentation: Ref Manual should use newer "packagegroup-* names.

Applied. Thanks, Scott >-Original Message- >From: yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto- >boun...@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Robert P. J. Day >Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2014 8:36 AM >To: Yocto discussion list >Subject: [yocto] [PATCH] Documentation: Ref Manual should use newer >

Re: [yocto] [yocto-docs][PATCH] Grammar fix to kernel-dev manual.

Applied. Thanks, Scott >-Original Message- >From: yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto- >boun...@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Robert P. J. Day >Sent: Friday, July 18, 2014 12:31 PM >To: Yocto discussion list >Subject: [yocto] [yocto-docs][PATCH] Grammar fix to kernel-dev manual.