Re: [yocto] Eclipse CMake Errors

2014-05-09 Thread Zhang, Jessica
Could you please file a bug for this in yocto project bugzilla? Thanks, Jessica -Original Message- From: yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Sébastien Taylor Sent: Friday, May 09, 2014 11:27 AM To: yocto@yoctoproject.org Subject: [yocto] Ec

Re: [yocto] [meta-atmel] at91sam9x5ek: "no machine record defined" failure for core-image-minimal

2014-05-09 Thread Bryan Evenson
Brian, > -Original Message- > From: Brian Karcz [mailto:bri...@russound.com] > Sent: Friday, May 09, 2014 3:49 PM > To: Bryan Evenson; Bruce Ashfield; yocto@yoctoproject.org > Subject: RE: [yocto] [meta-atmel] at91sam9x5ek: "no machine record > defined" failure for core-image-minimal > >

Re: [yocto] SATO on Intel DN2800MT

2014-05-09 Thread r10kindsofpeople
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 3:43 PM, Chris Tapp wrote: > On 8 May 2014, at 18:52, r10kindsofpeople > wrote: > > > On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 12:39 PM, Chris Tapp > wrote: > > Hi John, > > > > On 8 May 2014, at 16:25, r10kindsofpeople > wrote: > > > > > I'm trying to experiment with the SATO build on a

Re: [yocto] [meta-atmel] at91sam9x5ek: "no machine record defined" failure for core-image-minimal

2014-05-09 Thread Brian Karcz
Hi Bryan, Thanks for the tip. Any chance you tried assigning the PREFFERED_VERSION to 3.6.9 and using the linux4sam meta-atmel layer as is? I'll definitely check out your layer. I was hoping the at91sam9x5ek would just build so that I could start tweaking it to define a machine works for its l

Re: [yocto] [meta-atmel] at91sam9x5ek: "no machine record defined" failure for core-image-minimal

2014-05-09 Thread Bryan Evenson
Brian, > -Original Message- > From: yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto- > boun...@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Bruce Ashfield > Sent: Friday, May 09, 2014 2:42 PM > To: Brian Karcz; yocto@yoctoproject.org > Subject: Re: [yocto] [meta-atmel] at91sam9x5ek: "no machine record > de

Re: [yocto] [meta-atmel] at91sam9x5ek: "no machine record defined" failure for core-image-minimal

2014-05-09 Thread Brian Karcz
Hi Bruce, Yeah, that's the avenue I'm going to have to go down. I was hoping to avoid the trial by fire approach and learn by making small mods to an existing working build, but it looks like that might not be in the cards. I was hoping that one of the at91/linux4sam people or someone familiar

Re: [yocto] [oe] GStreamer 0.10's future

2014-05-09 Thread Burton, Ross
On 9 May 2014 16:19, Neuer User wrote: > Yes, it does, as long as you need QtMultimedia. Same applies to Qt5. > There was a discussion on the Qt mailing list about moving to > gstreamer1.0, but this seems to be rather some time in the future was my > impression. So Qt 5.3 won't have GStreamer 1.0

[yocto] Eclipse CMake Errors

2014-05-09 Thread Sébastien Taylor
When using an Eclipse Yocto CMake project, errors in cmake are simply reported as a generic error. Is there an existing method of having the plugin display the detailed cmake stdout/stderr output instead? Example error, 'Configuring project' has encountered a problem. Build of project failed

Re: [yocto] [oe] GStreamer 0.10's future

2014-05-09 Thread Burton, Ross
On 9 May 2014 16:19, Neuer User wrote: >> So the catch here is that Qt4 currently depends on GStreamer 0.10. >> > Yes, it does, as long as you need QtMultimedia. Same applies to Qt5. > There was a discussion on the Qt mailing list about moving to > gstreamer1.0, but this seems to be rather some ti

Re: [yocto] [meta-atmel] at91sam9x5ek: "no machine record defined" failure for core-image-minimal

2014-05-09 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 14-05-09 10:58 AM, Brian Karcz wrote: Hi Bruce, I'm not entirely familiar with the mechanism that gets the defconfig from the BSP to the .config in work area, but here is how things currently look. The two files aren't a direct match as there appear to be some formatting differences, but t

Re: [yocto] replace udhcpc

2014-05-09 Thread Burton, Ross
On 9 May 2014 17:57, Neuer User wrote: > Seems, I am not the only one wondering why connman phones home: The "ask the author" approach works quite well. The hostname it's looking up is connman.net. This is the captive portal detection: pretty much every major platform does something similar and

Re: [yocto] RPM to Verify Installed Packages

2014-05-09 Thread Mark Hatle
On 5/7/14, 7:46 AM, Diego Sueiro wrote: Folks, I'm looking at this issue. I'd suggest you open a bug in the Yocto Project bugzilla. Feel free to assign it to me. (I'll end up with it anyway...) --Mark On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 3:48 PM, Diego Sueiro mailto:diego.sue...@gmail.com>> wrote:

Re: [yocto] replace udhcpc

2014-05-09 Thread Neuer User
Seems, I am not the only one wondering why connman phones home: https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=181038 The address is 87.106.208.187, which is the IP of "senator.holtmann.net". The author of the connman package seems to be Marcel Holtmann . Honestly, without a reasonable explanation w

Re: [yocto] replace udhcpc

2014-05-09 Thread Neuer User
Hi Andrea I'd like the idea of a somewhat smarter network daemon, but connman slowly becomes a bit suspicious to me. First, it is very bad documented and difficult to understand what it does. Second, it needs iptables to work. Why? Third, it adds strange static routes to my routing table and dele

Re: [yocto] building qtbase for raspberry pi fails

2014-05-09 Thread Felix01 Fischer
Hello all, I managed to get qtbase building with a raspberry pi. In the end, all you have to do is to add a .bbappend for qtbase with the following QT_CONFIG_FLAGS += " \ -device linux-rasp-pi-g++ \ -device-option CROSS_COMPILE=$PATH_TO_SYSROOT_DIR/x86_64-linux/usr/bin/arm-poky-linux-gnu

[yocto] nativesdk-cmake can't use a separate build dir, currently fails to build

2014-05-09 Thread Jonathan Austin
Hi all, I've discovered today that nativesdk-cmake fails to build by default. The cmake and cmake-native targets still work. The difference appears to be the metadata in: meta/conf/distro/include/seperatebuilddir.inc ...which tells bitbake not to use a separate build dir for the latter two

Re: [yocto] replace udhcpc

2014-05-09 Thread Andrea Galbusera
Michael, On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 3:21 PM, Auslands-KV wrote: > Thanks a lot. I will look through these links and hope I will understand > better then :-) > > I hope it works nicely with a read-only rootfs. It seems to write to its > own config data (which is a strange behaviour). One of the reaso

Re: [yocto] replace udhcpc

2014-05-09 Thread Neuer User
Great, then I will remove it. My app does not run as root, but all system configuration tasks are only available for root on my system. Am 09.05.2014 17:22, schrieb Burton, Ross: > On 9 May 2014 16:15, Neuer User wrote: >> Do you by chance know, why it depends on the xuser-account package? I >>

Re: [yocto] replace udhcpc

2014-05-09 Thread Burton, Ross
On 9 May 2014 16:15, Neuer User wrote: > Do you by chance know, why it depends on the xuser-account package? I > don't want any additional user accounts on my system. If it is not > essential I would remove it. If you're applications are running as root then you can remove the dependency on that

Re: [yocto] RPM to Verify Installed Packages

2014-05-09 Thread Diego Sueiro
Folks, After 1 day of debugging I found what was causing the issue. Commenting out the to lines (590-591) below on lib/verify.c (showVerifyPackage function) solved the issue: /* If not verifying %ghost, skip ghost files. */ /* XXX the broken!!! logic disables %ghost queries always. */

Re: [yocto] [oe] GStreamer 0.10's future

2014-05-09 Thread Neuer User
Am 08.05.2014 17:54, schrieb Burton, Ross: > On 8 May 2014 15:48, Burton, Ross wrote: >> For the 1.7 release I want to move GStreamer 0.10 from oe-core into >> meta-multimedia, and ensure everything in oe-core has ported to >> GStreamer 1.x. GStreamer 0.10 is considered dead upstream and is >> un

Re: [yocto] replace udhcpc

2014-05-09 Thread Neuer User
Thanks a lot. I will look through these links and hope I will understand better then :-) I hope it works nicely with a read-only rootfs. It seems to write to its own config data (which is a strange behaviour). Do you by chance know, why it depends on the xuser-account package? I don't want any ad

Re: [yocto] replace udhcpc

2014-05-09 Thread Auslands-KV
Thanks a lot. I will look through these links and hope I will understand better then :-) I hope it works nicely with a read-only rootfs. It seems to write to its own config data (which is a strange behaviour). Do you by chance know, why it depends on the xuser-account package? I don't want any ad

[yocto] [yocto-autobuilder][PATCH v1 4/4] GetDeployDir.py/PublishArtifacts.py: get deploy dir from bitbake

2014-05-09 Thread stefan
From: Stefan Agner Since the deploy dir is configureable (also through TMPDIR), we need to have a more generic variant to get that path. Also the Ångstrom distribution adds "-eglibc" to the TMPDIR. Hence, the safest way to get the deployment dir is to parse buildbots environment. Signed-off-by:

[yocto] [yocto-autobuilder][PATCH v1 3/4] master.py/botmaster.py: use builders list for builders order

2014-05-09 Thread stefan
From: Stefan Agner This patch uses the order of the list builderNames when requesting builder names. This order is relevant for the Waterfall order. However, the order of builderNames is not meaningful by default, hence the change in botmaster.py makes sure the builderNames is taken form the con

[yocto] [yocto-autobuilder][PATCH v1 2/4] README: add high level overview, fix build slave description

2014-05-09 Thread stefan
From: Stefan Agner Replace builders with build slaves, since this are different things in BuildBot world. Also add a section with some high level view what Autobuilder actually is. Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner --- README | 8 README-NEW-AUTOBUILDER | 11 +++ 2

[yocto] [yocto-autobuilder][PATCH v1 1/4] GetDistroVersion.py support for Angstrom distro version

2014-05-09 Thread stefan
From: Stefan Agner Ångström distribution has a different location for distro version, support "angstrom" as distro too. Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner --- .../site-packages/autobuilder/buildsteps/GetDistroVersion.py | 7 +-- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a

[yocto] [yocto-autobuilder][PATCH v1 0/4] fixes for use with Angstrom

2014-05-09 Thread stefan
From: Stefan Agner Hi folks, We plan to make use of the Yocto Autobuilder at Toradex. I successfully deployed an installation, however since we distribute an Anstrom based BSP I had to adjust some files. With those patches and a custom layer configuration (not included since quite ugly) I'm able

Re: [yocto] [OE-core] GStreamer 0.10's future

2014-05-09 Thread Tim Orling
> On May 8, 2014, at 8:07 AM, Paul Eggleton > wrote: > >> On Thursday 08 May 2014 15:48:40 Burton, Ross wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Sorry for the cross-post but I want this to have a wide audience. >> >> For the 1.7 release I want to move GStreamer 0.10 from oe-core into >> meta-multimedia, and

Re: [yocto] [meta-atmel] at91sam9x5ek: "no machine record defined" failure for core-image-minimal

2014-05-09 Thread Brian Karcz
Hi Bruce, I'm not entirely familiar with the mechanism that gets the defconfig from the BSP to the .config in work area, but here is how things currently look. The two files aren't a direct match as there appear to be some formatting differences, but the variables in the SOC/ARCH section seem t

Re: [yocto] Question / issue

2014-05-09 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 14-05-09 01:14 AM, Paul McGougan wrote: Hi all. We are currently using Poky 1.5.0. We have created our own custom layer for our powerpc-based board. We are running u-boot as our bootloader and want to use the new FIT (FDT) style kernel/dtb image blob. To that end, in our custom layer we

Re: [yocto] [meta-atmel] at91sam9x5ek: "no machine record defined" failure for core-image-minimal

2014-05-09 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 14-05-09 09:44 AM, Brian Karcz wrote: Hi, Not sure if this is the correct place to email this, but I’ve seen a few other meta-atmel references so I figured I’d give it a shot. I’m attempting to setup a core-image-minimal build using the guidelines in the meta-atmel README for the at91sam9x5e

[yocto] [meta-atmel] at91sam9x5ek: "no machine record defined" failure for core-image-minimal

2014-05-09 Thread Brian Karcz
Hi, Not sure if this is the correct place to email this, but I've seen a few other meta-atmel references so I figured I'd give it a shot. I'm attempting to setup a core-image-minimal build using the guidelines in the meta-atmel README for the at91sam9x5ek machine type. When the kernel build goe

[yocto] Mesa do_compile fail

2014-05-09 Thread Fabio Berton
Hi! I'm trying to make a qt4-x11 image and the mesa_9.1.6.bb failed on compile. The log is http://pastebin.com/0Zznjsux I'm using host build Fedora 20 and dora branch from poky. I tried to use the mesa version 9.1.3 and the same error occurs. Fabio Berton. -- _

Re: [yocto] [meta-selinux][PATCH] initscripts/checkroot.sh: restore file contexts for /run

2014-05-09 Thread Joe MacDonald
Merged, thanks Jackie. -J. [[yocto] [meta-selinux][PATCH] initscripts/checkroot.sh: restore file contexts for /run] On 14.05.09 (Fri 05:50) jackie.hu...@windriver.com wrote: > From: Jackie Huang > > The file contexts for /run is incorrect while running checkroot.sh > in boot time which causes

Re: [yocto] replace udhcpc

2014-05-09 Thread Andrea Galbusera
Hi, On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 12:28 PM, Neuer User wrote: > Connman is really a problem without documentation. :-( > > I tried it out and first I noticed that it depends on the creation of an > xuser account. It also needs iptables, so probably can configure these, too. > > I also found that it does

[yocto] [meta-raspberrypi][PATCH 8/9] rpi-gpio: Update to v0.5.5

2014-05-09 Thread Andrei Gherzan
Change-Id: I8394426b9ffc3c3b524e9fb536945e25d74b2ddd Signed-off-by: Andrei Gherzan --- recipes-devtools/python/rpi-gpio_0.5.4.bb | 19 --- recipes-devtools/python/rpi-gpio_0.5.5.bb | 19 +++ 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 rec

[yocto] [meta-raspberrypi][PATCH 7/9] userland: Update to remote's HEAD

2014-05-09 Thread Andrei Gherzan
Change-Id: If0e36184c741da5d68c158e1fb582050f5835bf9 Signed-off-by: Andrei Gherzan --- recipes-graphics/userland/userland_git.bb | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/recipes-graphics/userland/userland_git.bb b/recipes-graphics/userland/userland_git.bb index 07c8381

[yocto] [meta-raspberrypi][PATCH 9/9] omxplayer: Update to remote's HEAD

2014-05-09 Thread Andrei Gherzan
Rebase a patch for this version and fix "unsafe for cross-compilation" warnings. Change-Id: Idcc9f188bc716982ede9dfb5f87870d9f5a2f9a3 Signed-off-by: Andrei Gherzan --- ...nd-headers-from-ffmpeg-are-installed-in-u.patch | 38 +- recipes-multimedia/omxplayer/omxplayer_git.bb

[yocto] [meta-raspberrypi][PATCH 6/9] firmware: Update to remote's HEAD

2014-05-09 Thread Andrei Gherzan
Change-Id: I9e28318c5746484ebde636295c66f7b6b64ba2fb Signed-off-by: Andrei Gherzan --- recipes-bcm/common/firmware.inc | 5 ++--- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/recipes-bcm/common/firmware.inc b/recipes-bcm/common/firmware.inc index 390f6b3..168cd37 100644 --- a/rec

[yocto] [meta-raspberrypi][PATCH 5/9] linux-raspberrypi: Replace v3.13.3 by v3.14.2

2014-05-09 Thread Andrei Gherzan
Change-Id: I2ceb950d30f984ab66de79085b30b541d20e6e25 Signed-off-by: Andrei Gherzan --- recipes-kernel/linux/linux-raspberrypi_3.13.3.bb | 6 -- recipes-kernel/linux/linux-raspberrypi_3.14.2.bb | 6 ++ 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 recipes-kernel/linu

[yocto] [meta-raspberrypi][PATCH 1/9] rpi-default-versions: Use 3.12.X as default kernel version

2014-05-09 Thread Andrei Gherzan
Change-Id: Ief7949be4b9726b5b6ba58e6280f6b6ca3fdfdc4 Signed-off-by: Andrei Gherzan --- conf/machine/include/rpi-default-versions.inc | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/conf/machine/include/rpi-default-versions.inc b/conf/machine/include/rpi-default-versions.inc i

[yocto] [meta-raspberrypi][PATCH 4/9] linux-raspberrypi: Update v3.12.11 to v3.12.18

2014-05-09 Thread Andrei Gherzan
Change-Id: Ifa763e4352051e4533eac98b4f7c74daf791cf72 Signed-off-by: Andrei Gherzan --- recipes-kernel/linux/linux-raspberrypi_3.12.11.bb | 6 -- recipes-kernel/linux/linux-raspberrypi_3.12.18.bb | 6 ++ 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 recipes-kernel/li

[yocto] [meta-raspberrypi][PATCH 2/9] linux-raspberrypi: Update v3.10.30 to v3.10.38

2014-05-09 Thread Andrei Gherzan
Change-Id: Ia620e8fd6928f9cd2c625b87599cd6d6a405a344 Signed-off-by: Andrei Gherzan --- recipes-kernel/linux/linux-raspberrypi_3.10.30.bb | 6 -- recipes-kernel/linux/linux-raspberrypi_3.10.38.bb | 6 ++ 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 recipes-kernel/li

[yocto] [meta-raspberrypi][PATCH 3/9] linux-raspberrypi: Remove v3.11

2014-05-09 Thread Andrei Gherzan
Change-Id: I28824a738a081bdeb362da4cf0cb449d11cbe449 Signed-off-by: Andrei Gherzan --- recipes-kernel/linux/linux-raspberrypi_3.11.10.bb | 6 -- 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 recipes-kernel/linux/linux-raspberrypi_3.11.10.bb diff --git a/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-raspbe

Re: [yocto] Third Party Components Integration in Yocto

2014-05-09 Thread Alex J Lennon
On 09/05/2014 06:56, Meenakumari Shedole wrote: > Thanks for your response Alex. > > I gone with all these steps but not helpful. > Hi Meena, I'm sorry to hear that. I think your installation line is still incorrect, and should probably be ${S}/bb-example or ${WORKDIR}/bb-example I'm not sure w

Re: [yocto] Issue with download cache tarball uniqueness?

2014-05-09 Thread Alex J Lennon
On 09/05/2014 11:38, Alex J Lennon wrote: > Hi, > > I'm putting together a simple example recipe and have run into an issue > with an incorrect tarball being used from the download cache. > > e.g. I have some code committed to github here > > https://github.com/DynamicDevices/bbexample/ > > It's t

[yocto] Issue with download cache tarball uniqueness?

2014-05-09 Thread Alex J Lennon
Hi, I'm putting together a simple example recipe and have run into an issue with an incorrect tarball being used from the download cache. e.g. I have some code committed to github here https://github.com/DynamicDevices/bbexample/ It's tagged v1.0 so github generates a source tarball for me here

[yocto] WiPi on meta-raspberrypi

2014-05-09 Thread Joe D
Would anyone be able to help me set up a recipe for using the WiPi dongle on the meta-raspberrypi backend? -- ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto

Re: [yocto] replace udhcpc

2014-05-09 Thread Neuer User
Connman is really a problem without documentation. :-( I tried it out and first I noticed that it depends on the creation of an xuser account. It also needs iptables, so probably can configure these, too. I also found that it does not correctly configure the dns entries: cat /etc/resolv.conf: #

Re: [yocto] couple simple questions on building for intel galileo

2014-05-09 Thread Robert P. J. Day
On Thu, 8 May 2014, Rob Woolley wrote: > Hi Rob, > Have you seen the Quark BSP Build Guide? > > https://communities.intel.com/servlet/JiveServlet/previewBody/21882-102-1-25153/Quark_BSPBuildGuide_329687_001.pdf i believe there is a much newer release of that doc here: https://communities.intel

[yocto] [meta-selinux][PATCH] initscripts/checkroot.sh: restore file contexts for /run

2014-05-09 Thread jackie.huang
From: Jackie Huang The file contexts for /run is incorrect while running checkroot.sh in boot time which causes mount fail to create new dir and file in /run, so restore the security contexts in it. Signed-off-by: Jackie Huang --- recipes-core/initscripts/initscripts_1.0.bbappend |2 ++ 1

Re: [yocto] Third Party Components Integration in Yocto

2014-05-09 Thread Burton, Ross
On 9 May 2014 06:56, Meenakumari Shedole wrote: > install: cannot stat `bb-example': No such file or directory Your compile task didn't actually work. Ross -- ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto