On 11/10/13 14:55, Otavio Salvador wrote:
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 10:45 PM, Saul Wold wrote:
Sorry for the top post here. The real reason we still have Qt3 is because
it's required part of the LSB spec. OE-Core contains Qt4 and we know that
meta-qt5 exists from Otavio and Martin.
I know that
On 11/10/13 14:45, Saul Wold wrote:
Sorry for the top post here. The real reason we still have Qt3 is
because it's required part of the LSB spec. OE-Core contains Qt4 and we
know that meta-qt5 exists from Otavio and Martin.
Thanks for the explanation.
I know that Richard and Paul have been
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 10:45 PM, Saul Wold wrote:
>
> Sorry for the top post here. The real reason we still have Qt3 is because
> it's required part of the LSB spec. OE-Core contains Qt4 and we know that
> meta-qt5 exists from Otavio and Martin.
>
> I know that Richard and Paul have been watchin
Sorry for the top post here. The real reason we still have Qt3 is
because it's required part of the LSB spec. OE-Core contains Qt4 and we
know that meta-qt5 exists from Otavio and Martin.
I know that Richard and Paul have been watching what's going on with
meta-qt5.
Sau!
On 10/10/2013 05
Game, set, and match! This is also why I don't play golf!
There are many layers I would love to see in the YP QA process and I
would count meta-qt5 in the top priority. However, we only have so
many resources, so we have to focus on the core right now. I'd be
happy to talk offline about finding w
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 7:26 PM, Christian Gagneraud wrote:
> On 11/10/13 11:02, Jeff Osier-Mixon wrote:
>>
>> Hi Chris - well-intended sarcasm isn't usually a problem, but I want
>> to make sure to address your concerns here. We would like to see a
>> meta-qt5 as well but so far one has not been
On 11/10/13 11:02, Jeff Osier-Mixon wrote:
Hi Chris - well-intended sarcasm isn't usually a problem, but I want
to make sure to address your concerns here. We would like to see a
meta-qt5 as well but so far one has not been submitted. If you would
like to submit one, I would be happy to put you i
Hi Chris - well-intended sarcasm isn't usually a problem, but I want
to make sure to address your concerns here. We would like to see a
meta-qt5 as well but so far one has not been submitted. If you would
like to submit one, I would be happy to put you in touch with the
right maintainers who can gu
On 09/10/13 11:35, Flanagan, Elizabeth wrote:
All,
The final release candidate for the upcoming Yocto Project 1.5 (dora 10.0.0)
release is now available for testing at:
http://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/pub/releases/1.5_M5.rc6
poky 102bf5e0f640fe85068452a42b85077f1c81e0c9
eclipse-poky-juno 2
All,
I've rebuilt out 1.5 on the refreshed OS autobuilders. Everything was
green. The binaries are available at:
http://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/pub/releases/dora-10.0.0
--
Elizabeth Flanagan
Yocto Project
Build and Release
___
yocto mailing list
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Burton, Ross wrote:
> Use $D instead of ${D}. ${D} will get expanded when the package is
> created but you want to use the environment variable $D.
>
Looks like that worked! I apologize for missing the curly braces in your
previous response.
Thanks very much!
On 10 October 2013 16:02, Seth Bollinger wrote:
>> You need to use $D so that you're not attempting to write to the *host's*
>> /etc:
>>
>> echo test >> $D/etc/inittest2
>>
>> In a postinst $D may be set, and if it is then the postinst is being
>> ran on the host at rootfs time, and points to wher
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 9:40 AM, Burton, Ross wrote:
> You need to use $D so that you're not attempting to write to the *host's*
> /etc:
>
> echo test >> $D/etc/inittest2
>
> In a postinst $D may be set, and if it is then the postinst is being
> ran on the host at rootfs time, and points to where
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 4:31 AM, Paul Eggleton <
paul.eggle...@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> That's really the recommended way to do it. If the software being
> configured
> supports it, another way is to set it up to read all configuration files
> from a
> directory and then you can simply install a
On 10 October 2013 15:36, Seth Bollinger wrote:
> pkg_postinst_${PN} () {
> echo 127.0.0.1${MACHINE} >> /etc/hosts
> }
Yeah, that's broken.
> I've tried this in my recipe, and the file that I expect to be present in
> the rootfs is not there...not sure what I'm doing wrong.
> pkg_postins
On 10Oct 2013, at 12:01 PM, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> Hi Jay,
>
> On Wednesday 02 October 2013 00:02:11 JC wrote:
>> I'm currently putting together a bunch of recipes to install some cpan
>> modules. I had some complaints by bitbake about files being installed
>> but not shipped.
>>
>> I figured
When the object passed to git rev-parse is a tag, we need to dereference
the tag until a commit id is found or the object cannot be dereferenced
anymore hence add ^0. (^0 is a short-hand for ^{commit})
This avoids confusing tarballs like
http://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/pub/releases/dora-10.0.0
On Thursday 12 September 2013 13:53:49 Nicolas Dechesne wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Paul Eggleton <
> paul.eggle...@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > > Is the best course to create a recipe bbappend for the
> > > lighttpd_1.4.31.bb file that is being used? And can I just include a new
> >
Hi Jay,
On Wednesday 02 October 2013 00:02:11 JC wrote:
> I'm currently putting together a bunch of recipes to install some cpan
> modules. I had some complaints by bitbake about files being installed
> but not shipped.
>
> I figured that I need to populate FILES_{PN} but I'm not clear about
> wh
i know there are two layers supporting the BBB -- meta-beagleboard
and meta-ti. for building a simple, bootable system for a BBB for
classroom purposes, can anyone recommend one over the other? i realize
that's kind of an open-ended question, but i'm after simplicity and a
minimum of hacking to
Hi Seth,
On Wednesday 09 October 2013 19:16:15 seth bollinger wrote:
> What's the best practice for recipes that need to update a shared file
> provided by a different recipe? For example let's say that the
> widget-watcher recipe creates /etc/ww.conf and the widget1, and widget2
> recipes need t
Hi Robert,
On Thursday 10 October 2013 04:42:07 Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> probably more of a bitbake question but in the bitbake checkout,
> there is a "doc" directory that contains what is clearly an old user
> manual. is there any value to this manual? it's noticeably out of
> date, and i know
probably more of a bitbake question but in the bitbake checkout,
there is a "doc" directory that contains what is clearly an old user
manual. is there any value to this manual? it's noticeably out of
date, and i know more bitbake content is being added into the yocto
manuals.
so is there any
Hello, all
Please give me some comments.
Thanks
chunrong
-Original Message-
From: Guo Chunrong-B40290
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2013 11:26 AM
To: yocto@yoctoproject.org
Cc: Liu Ting-B28495; Luo Zhenhua-B19537; Guo Chunrong-B40290; Guo
Chunrong-B40290
Subject: [Meta-security][PA
Anders Darander writes:
>
>
> Jack wrote:
> >Anders Darander ...> writes:
> >
> >Thanks Anders,
> >
> >But I have this problem not only for GPIOs, but also for other
> >registers.
>
> Well, my comment about dereferencing physical addresses using *-only,
wasn't restricted to GPIO's only.
> It
25 matches
Mail list logo
