Hi Paul,
Both of them will generate the cross toolchain which will be used by
application developer on their development host for generate binaries for their
target embedded devices, this cross toolchain includes the cross compiler,
cross linker, etc. But to allow for cross development, the ap
Or, looking at your notes, is it that "bitbake -c populate_sdk "
takes the toolchain that was used to build the image, and packages it up as
an SDK for the benefit of application developers (the normal case), while
"bitbake meta-toolchain" builds a new SDK that may be different in some
ways, includ
> From: Trevor Woerner
>
> Imagine a company which produces embedded devices running Linux. There
> are hardware engineers, and software people. Within the software group
> there will always be that person (or group) which is responsible for
> creating the Linux filesystem which runs on the device
On 06/12/2013 03:51 PM, Paul D. DeRocco wrote:
For now, I really just need to know if I'm interested in the SDK, since I
have no intention of ever running compilations on my target system.
Trevor's answer has a lot of great background.
My short answer is gcc-cross is for use inside bitbake (i
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 9:41 AM, Diego wrote:
> In data martedì 11 giugno 2013 15:10:42, Flanagan, Elizabeth ha scritto:
>> On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 5:28 AM, Diego wrote:
>> > Hi everybody,
>> >
>> > I have written a recipe which I'd like to contribute for glmark2:
>> > https://launchpad.net/glmar
On 13-06-12 4:54 PM, Bryan Evenson wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Trevor Woerner [mailto:twoer...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2013 4:42 PM
To: Bryan Evenson
Cc: Bruce Ashfield; yocto@yoctoproject.org
Subject: Re: [yocto] Problems fetching branch for linux-yocto-custom
On Wed
On 13-06-12 4:41 PM, Trevor Woerner wrote:
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Bryan Evenson wrote:
# Added KBRANCH spec
KBRANCH = "linux-3.9-at91"
# Override SRC_URI in a bbappend file to point at a different source
#
tree if you do not want to build from Linus' tree.
SRC_URI = "git://github.c
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Paul D. DeRocco wrote:
> For now, I really just need to know if I'm interested in the SDK, since I
> have no intention of ever running compilations on my target system.
Imagine a company which produces embedded devices running Linux. There
are hardware engineers,
> -Original Message-
> From: Trevor Woerner [mailto:twoer...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2013 4:42 PM
> To: Bryan Evenson
> Cc: Bruce Ashfield; yocto@yoctoproject.org
> Subject: Re: [yocto] Problems fetching branch for linux-yocto-custom
>
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Br
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Paul D. DeRocco wrote:
> Shouldn't gcc-cross be described as a "cross"
> package rather than a "native", and shouldn't gcc-crosssdk be described as a
> "native" binary that runs on the target? Or am I still fundamentally
> misinterpreting these things?
Your unders
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Bryan Evenson wrote:
> # Added KBRANCH spec
> KBRANCH = "linux-3.9-at91"
>> > # Override SRC_URI in a bbappend file to point at a different source
>> #
>> > tree if you do not want to build from Linus' tree.
>> > SRC_URI = "git://github.com/linux4sam/linux-at91.git
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 1:06 PM, Hans Beckerus wrote:
> On 2013-06-12 7:55, Flanagan, Elizabeth wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 6:05 AM, Hans Beckérus
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> In what way does LIC_FILES_CHKSUM correlate to what is specified in
>>> LICENSE?
>>> LIC_FILES_CHKSUM *must* be specified u
On 2013-06-12 7:55, Flanagan, Elizabeth wrote:
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 6:05 AM, Hans Beckérus wrote:
In what way does LIC_FILES_CHKSUM correlate to what is specified in LICENSE?
LIC_FILES_CHKSUM *must* be specified unless LICENSE is set to CLOSED.
But, what if the package does not itself provid
On 13-06-12 03:02 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
Add I2C fragments for ease of use in BSP descriptions and recipe-space
KERNEL_FEATURES.
Add I2C_CHARDEV support to the MinnowBoard description.
Ack'd. These are fine. I'm on my way out for the evening, but will have
these merged later tonight.
Bruce
I need this clarified as well. I am taking some "guesses" here and hoping for
input.
Scott
>-Original Message-
>From: Paul D. DeRocco [mailto:pdero...@ix.netcom.com]
>Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2013 12:51 PM
>To: 'Paul Eggleton'; Rifenbark, Scott M
>Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org
>Subject: R
On 13-06-12 03:47 PM, Bryan Evenson wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Ashfield [mailto:bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2013 3:44 PM
To: Bryan Evenson
Cc: Bruce Ashfield; yocto@yoctoproject.org
Subject: Re: [yocto] Problems fetching branch for linux-yocto-cus
> From: Paul Eggleton
>
> gcc-cross-intermediate is gone as of 1.3; as I understand it
> current versions
> of glibc can be compiled using gcc-cross-initial so the
> intermediate step is
> no longer required. We should remove mention of this from the
> documentation
> (other than in the migr
> -Original Message-
> From: Bruce Ashfield [mailto:bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2013 3:44 PM
> To: Bryan Evenson
> Cc: Bruce Ashfield; yocto@yoctoproject.org
> Subject: Re: [yocto] Problems fetching branch for linux-yocto-custom
>
> On 13-06-12 03:37 PM, Bry
On 13-06-12 03:37 PM, Bryan Evenson wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Ashfield [mailto:bruce.ashfi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2013 3:15 PM
To: Bryan Evenson
Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org
Subject: Re: [yocto] Problems fetching branch for linux-yocto-custom
On Wed, Jun 12,
> -Original Message-
> From: Bruce Ashfield [mailto:bruce.ashfi...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2013 3:15 PM
> To: Bryan Evenson
> Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org
> Subject: Re: [yocto] Problems fetching branch for linux-yocto-custom
>
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 3:10 PM, Bryan Evenso
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 3:10 PM, Bryan Evenson wrote:
> All,
>
> I have a custom linux recipe that I would like to fetch the head of a
> specific branch on a Git repository. During the build it always fetches the
> master branch, not the branch I am specifying. I've tried adding every
> relav
All,
I have a custom linux recipe that I would like to fetch the head of a specific
branch on a Git repository. During the build it always fetches the master
branch, not the branch I am specifying. I've tried adding every relavant flag
to the SRC_URI that I can think of and it still fetches a
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 6:05 AM, Hans Beckérus wrote:
> In what way does LIC_FILES_CHKSUM correlate to what is specified in LICENSE?
> LIC_FILES_CHKSUM *must* be specified unless LICENSE is set to CLOSED.
> But, what if the package does not itself provide a license type file?
> Is it then ok to si
Hi. Anyone that can tell me why 'wdj' and 'wdj/l10n' folders are added
to /var/lib?
I sort of dislike having files/folders generated that I can not
explain what they are doing; eventually the question will arise ;)
Has it something to do with RPM? Should it really be there? I do not
have RPM suppor
In data martedì 11 giugno 2013 15:10:42, Flanagan, Elizabeth ha scritto:
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 5:28 AM, Diego wrote:
> > Hi everybody,
> >
> > I have written a recipe which I'd like to contribute for glmark2:
> > https://launchpad.net/glmark2
> >
> > The last thing that puzzles me before sub
location (with what should be the same git hashes) is at:
>
> http://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/pub/nightly/20130612-5
>
> This should only take a few hours to build out, so please check back
> in about 3 hours as there should be a fair amount of artifacts to
> begin testing.
On 12 June 2013 14:15, Rohit2 Jindal wrote:
> Hi ,
>
> Please help me out I am stuck in some issue, actually I want my recipe to do
> compilation everytime on every run of
>
> Bitbake linux-yocto
>
I'm currently tweaking the kernel myself and using "bitbake
linux-yocto -c compile -f" each time.
Hi ,
Please help me out I am stuck in some issue, actually I want my recipe to do
compilation everytime on every run of
Bitbake linux-yocto
ie can I remove stamping or sstate-cache that it allows me to run compilation
everytime on every run of bitbake linux-yocto.
I tried do_compile[nostamp]
In what way does LIC_FILES_CHKSUM correlate to what is specified in LICENSE?
LIC_FILES_CHKSUM *must* be specified unless LICENSE is set to CLOSED.
But, what if the package does not itself provide a license type file?
Is it then ok to simply leave LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "" ?
Also, I could see that ther
On 13-06-12 08:37 AM, Javi Roman wrote:
Hi!
Thank you for your help.
Finally I've had to change the meta/classes/kernel.bbclass in order to
fix the copy of defconfig to .config:
- if [ -f "${WORKDIR}/defconfig" ] && [ ! -f "${B}/.config" ]; then
+ if [ -f "${WORKDIR}/defconfig" ]; then
Hi!
Thank you for your help.
Finally I've had to change the meta/classes/kernel.bbclass in order to
fix the copy of defconfig to .config:
- if [ -f "${WORKDIR}/defconfig" ] && [ ! -f "${B}/.config" ]; then
+ if [ -f "${WORKDIR}/defconfig" ]; then
cp "${WORKDIR}/defconfig" "${B}/
On Wednesday 12 June 2013 12:27:16 Rifenbark, Scott M wrote:
> This begs the question for gcc-crosssdk-intermediate... Is that gone as
> well?
Yes.
Cheers,
Paul
--
Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
___
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctop
This begs the question for gcc-crosssdk-intermediate... Is that gone as well?
>-Original Message-
>From: Paul Eggleton [mailto:paul.eggle...@linux.intel.com]
>Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2013 5:00 AM
>To: yocto@yoctoproject.org
>Cc: Rifenbark, Scott M
>Subject: Re: [yocto] Need clarificatio
See
http://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/1.5/dev-manual/dev-manual.html#cross-development-toolchain
for the changes that I have made to the "Cross-Development Toolchain" term
description. Let me know if this helps. Also let me know if I have botched
anything.
Thanks,
Scott
>-Original Messa
Ahh... thanks. Just saw this after publishing some other changes.
Thanks,
Scott
>-Original Message-
>From: Paul Eggleton [mailto:paul.eggle...@linux.intel.com]
>Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2013 5:00 AM
>To: yocto@yoctoproject.org
>Cc: Rifenbark, Scott M
>Subject: Re: [yocto] Need clarifi
On Wednesday 12 June 2013 04:16:30 mich...@cubic.org wrote:
> Paul D. DeRocco wrote on Tuesday, June 11, 2013 at 9:07 PM:
> > "Following is a list of toolchain recipes..." This is followed by
> > gcc-cross-initial, gcc-cross-intermediate, gcc-cross. All three of these
> > things say that the toolch
That little tidbit is interesting... Thanks Bill. BTW - I am incorporating
some of this information into "Terms" section to help clear up stuff.
Scott
From: yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org] On
Behalf Of Bill Traynor
Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2013 4:33 AM
T
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 7:16 AM, wrote:
> > "Cross-Development Toolchain: A collection of software development tools
> > and
> > utilities that allow you to develop software for targeted architectures."
> > Is
> > that different from the toolchain that bitbake builds in the beginning,
> > and
> >
> "Cross-Development Toolchain: A collection of software development tools
> and
> utilities that allow you to develop software for targeted architectures."
> Is
> that different from the toolchain that bitbake builds in the beginning,
> and
> then uses to build the image? If so, what is it?
A "cr
This is only the cover letter for the entire patch series.
Changed since v2: fixed license for files.
Please review the following changes for suitability for inclusion. If you have
any objections or suggestions for improvement, please respond to the patches. If
you agree with the changes, please p
Hi Paul,
On Wednesday 12 June 2013 01:43:31 Paul D. DeRocco wrote:
> I see lots of references to "virtual/kernel", as opposed to simply "kernel".
> The bitbake docs show "virtual/whatever" and "virtual/package" in some of
> its syntactic examples. But what does the "virtual/" prefix actually mean?
Hi Edward,
On Tuesday 11 June 2013 08:50:49 Edward Vidal wrote:
> I am trying to understand the various branches of poky.
> It appears that 1.4_M6 became dylan-9.0.0 which is DISTRO_VERSION=
> "1.4". Is this correct?
I don't see a 1.4_M6 branch, only a 1.4_M6.rc1 tag which is not the same as
I see lots of references to "virtual/kernel", as opposed to simply "kernel".
The bitbake docs show "virtual/whatever" and "virtual/package" in some of
its syntactic examples. But what does the "virtual/" prefix actually mean?
Google coughs up endless uses of the term, as though everyone knows what
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Gary Thomas wrote:
> The problem is that bitbake runs recipes, not packages. So in order to
> get the package 'packagegroup-custom-tools', you have to build your main
> recipe which will also build 'packagegroup-custom-apps'
>
> I've run across this myself and wh
On 2013-06-12 09:08, Nicolas Dechesne wrote:
hello,
i am creating a packagegroup to organize better my image/recipes. i am
doing something along these lines:
DESCRIPTION = "My Custom Package Groups"
inherit packagegroup
PACKAGES = "\
packagegroup-custom-apps \
hello,
i am creating a packagegroup to organize better my image/recipes. i am
doing something along these lines:
DESCRIPTION = "My Custom Package Groups"
inherit packagegroup
PACKAGES = "\
packagegroup-custom-apps \
packagegroup-custom-tools \
"
RD
Yes, as per e2fsprogs.bb file,
PACKAGES =+ "e2fsprogs-e2fsck e2fsprogs-mke2fs e2fsprogs-tune2fs
e2fsprogs-badblocks"
..
FILES_e2fsprogs-mke2fs = "${base_sbindir}/mke2fs
${base_sbindir}/mkfs.ext* ${sysconfdir}/mke2fs.conf"
But finally you got what you want :)
//Gaurang Shastri
On Wed, Jun 12,
g/pub/nightly/20130612-5
This should only take a few hours to build out, so please check back
in about 3 hours as there should be a fair amount of artifacts to
begin testing.
-b
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 11:33 PM, Flanagan, Elizabeth
wrote:
> Folks
>
> We're going to respin this due
48 matches
Mail list logo
