han the previous build, lots of green. I
> think we'll therefore be going with that revision
> (7d22ef28e64de06b6238d0ef9b664c0bee6efa46) for M4-rc1, assuming the rest
> builds out ok.
It looks like we have a good buildout. I'll get branches
prepared/tagged and pushed later today.
On Tue, 2013-02-19 at 22:34 -0500, Trevor Woerner wrote:
> Following up on a hunch, after reading Pierre Ficheux's email from
> earlier today, I realized that by default I always switch my build's
> PACKAGE_CLASSES to ipk simply because this packaging takes the least
> amount of build time. Sure en
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 8:33 AM, Frans Meulenbroeks
wrote:
> Is there a kernel-devicetree package in you tmp/deploy ?
>
> I'm using ipk and I have:
> tmp/deploy/ipk/syrcxx/kernel-devicetree_2.6.38-r4_syrcxx.ipk
>
> If it is not there that is your problem.
> You may also want to nuke your tmp dir a
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Satya Swaroop Damarla
wrote:
> Hey hans, this is what he meant,
>
> In the machine config file add the following
>
> PREFERRED_VERSION_u-boot ?= "v2013.01%" or PREFERRED_VERSION_u-boot ?=
> "v2013.01.01%"
>
> By the way did you already complete the first part... T
Hey hans, this is what he meant,
In the machine config file add the following
PREFERRED_VERSION_u-boot ?= "v2013.01%" or PREFERRED_VERSION_u-boot ?=
"v2013.01.01%"
By the way did you already complete the first part... There is also other
file called "u-boot-fw-utils_2012.04.01.bb" ... I think w
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 5:16 PM, Rudolf Streif
wrote:
> Satya,
>
> Simply look at the u-boot recipes in meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot such as
> u-boot_2012.04.01.bb. You can simply copy it and name it u-boot_2013.01.bb
> and then modify SRCREV to the revision that corresponds to the tag 2013.01
> or 201
In my case I have resolved it in another way:
correct in Makefile for "eglib" folder SUBDIRS variables and excluded "test"
from them values:
-
egrep "SUBDIRS =" ./mono-2.10.2/build/eglib/Makefile
DIST_SUBDIRS = src test
SUBDIRS = src test
#SUBDIRS = src
#
Satya,
Simply look at the u-boot recipes in meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot such as
u-boot_2012.04.01.bb. You can simply copy it and name it
u-boot_2013.01.bband then modify SRCREV to the revision that
corresponds to the tag 2013.01
or 2013.01.01 in git.denx.de:
for 2013.01:
3a9d879f6f64585b819af728b53b
Hi Guys,
I need support for uboot on Tamonten board but the version on it is
v2012.04 but I came to know that v2012.10 or v2013.01 supports the
Tamontenboard through some guys here..
It would be great if you can tell me how can I accomplish v2013.01 or
v2012.10 into the build system and make it a
On 2013-02-20 00:21, Satya Swaroop Damarla wrote:
Hi Gary,
I think you are right that we need may be the new uboot version but it is not
available in the uboot directory of the poky and i get the follwoing warning
and the simulation is
ending like previously
NOTE: Resolving any missing ta
On Tue, 2013-02-19 at 21:01 -0800, Flanagan, Elizabeth wrote:
> I'm currently at ELC and am going to be a little slow with email.
> However, tonight I will be building M4 rc1. We are looking pretty
> green and had been hoping to use the last build for rc1, but we want
> to get it a little closer as
Hi,
First, mails that patch oe-core should be sent to the oe-core list,
not yocto@ (which is more of a support channel).
Second this patch won't do what you expect - when you find a file in
FILESEXTRAPATHS it isn't being installed, so it won't be in the
package.
I intentionally removed code that
Signed-off-by: Jukka Rissanen
---
meta/classes/systemd.bbclass | 8
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/meta/classes/systemd.bbclass b/meta/classes/systemd.bbclass
index 564cd72..b807d4e 100644
--- a/meta/classes/systemd.bbclass
+++ b/meta/classes/systemd.bbclass
@@ -1,3 +1,5
On 20 February 2013 11:15, Jukka Rissanen
wrote:
> -bb.error('%s does not appear in package list, please add it', "
> " + pkg_systemd)
> +bb.error('%s does not appear in package list, please add it' %
> pkg_systemd)
Whoops. Acked-by: Ross Burton
Ross
_
Thanks.
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 4:03 PM, Philipp Wagner wrote:
> Am 10.02.2013 18:55, schrieb Andrei Gherzan:
>
> WARNING: QA Issue: [...]/rpi-first-run-wizard.bb:
>> Variable RDEPENDS is set as not being package specific, please fix this.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Andrei Gherzan
>> ---
>>
>> re
Thank you. You hint is OK and will apply patches with your suggestion.
Thanks.
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 4:11 PM, Philipp Wagner wrote:
> Hi Andrei,
>
> I applied and tested all 7 patches and they work as the binary firmware
> did before. Maybe in a later patch a pkgconfig file can be added (I th
Instead of printing
ERROR: %s does not appear in package list, please add it package-systemd
print
ERROR: package-systemd does not appear in package list, please add it
instead.
Signed-off-by: Jukka Rissanen
---
meta/classes/systemd.bbclass | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Hi Amit,
If you want to have a chat about any of the Hobs (GTK or Web), get in touch. We
have also set up a mailing list for web hob: you might be interested in
subscribing
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/webhob
All the best,
Belen
From: , Song mailto:song@intel.com>>
Date: Wedne
18 matches
Mail list logo
