On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 6:25 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-05-18 at 17:38 -0400, Chris Hallinan wrote:
>> Note: this patch has already been submitted against other BSPs,
>> originally submitted to oe-core by Gary Thomas. I ran into this same
>> issue building MACHINE=emenlow on my own Z53
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 4:15 PM, wrote:
> From: Kishore Bodke
>
> Moving the Cedartrail PVR specific kernel
> features to the meta area and removing
> them from the BSP.
Looks fine to me. I won't be near a real computer for another day or so, but
I'll queue this then!
Cheers,
Bruce
>
> Plea
On Fri, 2012-05-18 at 17:38 -0400, Chris Hallinan wrote:
> Note: this patch has already been submitted against other BSPs,
> originally submitted to oe-core by Gary Thomas. I ran into this same
> issue building MACHINE=emenlow on my own Z530 platform. There are
> likely others as well where this
From: Kishore Bodke
Pointing to the latest version of PVR
Graphics drivers for the Cedartrail BSP.
Please pull into meta-intel/denzil
Thanks
Kishore.
The following changes since commit 7c1086df3f92d76ca1a062f9b4b1daf6823bfb63:
emgd-driver-bin: skip insane ldflags check (2012-05-17 20:15:53
From: Kishore Bodke
Point to the latest version of PVR Graphics
driver.
Signed-off-by: Kishore Bodke
---
.../xorg-driver/cdv-pvr-driver.inc | 12 +++---
.../xorg-driver/cdv-pvr-driver_1.0.bb | 44 ++--
2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 30 delet
Note: this patch has already been submitted against other BSPs,
originally submitted to oe-core by Gary Thomas. I ran into this same
issue building MACHINE=emenlow on my own Z530 platform. There are
likely others as well where this needs to be applied.
Upstream is here:
https://bugs.freedesktop.
On 18 May 2012, at 21:21, Chris Tapp wrote:
> I've got a build based on the 'poky' distro.
>
> I want to use libsdl with directfb, but this option is only enabled if
> 'directfb' is in DISTRO_FEATURES. Can I set this without creating my own
> distro?
Ah, got it. I need to set it in local.conf
The 3.0 based boards are lazy compared to our new modern ones.
Without this patch, the linux-yocto-3.0 kernel do_patch() task would fail
with:
/srv/home/pokybuild/yocto-autobuilder/yocto-slave/cedartrail/build/build/tmp/sysroots/x86_64-linux/usr/bin/updateme:
line 434: yocto/standard/cedartrail-s
I've got a build based on the 'poky' distro.
I want to use libsdl with directfb, but this option is only enabled if
'directfb' is in DISTRO_FEATURES. Can I set this without creating my own distro?
Chris Tapp
opensou...@keylevel.com
www.keylevel.com
___
From: Kishore Bodke
Moving Cedartrail PVR specific feature set
to kernel meta branch.
Signed-off-by: Kishore Bodke
---
.../bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail-pvr-merge.scc|6 ++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/meta/cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail-pvr-merge.scc
From: Kishore Bodke
Moving the Cedartrail PVR specific kernel
features to the meta area and removing
them from the BSP.
Please pull into linux-yocto-3.0/meta.
Thanks
Kishore.
The following changes since commit 34e0d2b4b4e9778b31f9ea99ca43f0dc71a7ee23:
meta: Clean up BSPs kernel config (20
I am in the process of upgrading from green 3.3.1 to edison 6.0.1 for
LabQuest, an armv7a machine. I'm making pretty good progress so far but am
dead in the water now. I'm woefully under-informed for these kinds of
issues, so I'm hoping someone can help me get unstuck.
These are the first errors
Yes, it's from format-patch.
Okay.
--
Mihai Lindner
-Original Message-
From: Saul Wold [mailto:s...@linux.intel.com]
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2012 5:05 PM
To: Lindner, MihaiX
Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org
Subject: Re: [yocto] [PATCH] xf86-video-intel version bump 2.18 to 2.19
On 05/18/2012 0
On 05/18/2012 03:29 PM, Lindner, MihaiX wrote:
From 10f08b73afb0c60b81b29f626cd38c171eb0c427 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: mihai lindner
Is this patch from format-patch?
Also, this should be posted to the
openembedded-c...@lists.openembedded.org mailing list
---
.../{xf86-video-intel_
>From 10f08b73afb0c60b81b29f626cd38c171eb0c427 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: mihai lindner
---
.../{xf86-video-intel_2.18.0.bb => xf86-video-intel_2.19.0.bb} |6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
rename meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-driver/{xf86-video-intel_2.18.0.bb =>
On 2012-05-18 04:36, Enric Balletbò i Serra wrote:
Hi Jack
2012/5/18 Jack Mitchell:
On 18/05/12 08:48, Enric Balletbò i Serra wrote:
Hi all,
Just to be sure, should the tag 2012.05-yocto1.2 from meta-ti layer be
compatible with yocto-1.2 (denzil) branch ? Or also depends on other
layers. Add
Folks,
A gentle reminder: Please ensure that you include a link to the final
commit in the Poky Master Branch (not your transient branch) when you
mark a bug Resolved.
You can get that URL from the cgit interface in the form of:
http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/poky/commit/?id=8da
Hi Jack
2012/5/18 Jack Mitchell :
> On 18/05/12 08:48, Enric Balletbò i Serra wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Just to be sure, should the tag 2012.05-yocto1.2 from meta-ti layer be
>> compatible with yocto-1.2 (denzil) branch ? Or also depends on other
>> layers. Adding only the meta-ti layer to the yo
On 18/05/12 08:48, Enric Balletbò i Serra wrote:
Hi all,
Just to be sure, should the tag 2012.05-yocto1.2 from meta-ti layer be
compatible with yocto-1.2 (denzil) branch ? Or also depends on other
layers. Adding only the meta-ti layer to the yocto 1.2 seems is not
working, there is an unmet depe
Hi all,
Just to be sure, should the tag 2012.05-yocto1.2 from meta-ti layer be
compatible with yocto-1.2 (denzil) branch ? Or also depends on other
layers. Adding only the meta-ti layer to the yocto 1.2 seems is not
working, there is an unmet dependency on systemd.bbclass.
yocto-1.2$ bitbake co
Hi All,
The document for the Yocto Project development process has been published on
the following wiki page:
https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Yocto_Project_Design_and_Development_Process
We attempt to use this place for us to document, learn and always improve our
process and methodology. P
21 matches
Mail list logo
