Robert P. J. Day wrote on 2012-03-26:
>
> currently, ch 5 of the reference manual claims that a generated
> "meta-toolchain" tarball should be unpacked under /opt/poky, which
> might be *historically* correct but i just baked a meta-toolchain and
> its tarball contents are all prefixed with "./
If any review of the package requirements as listed in the QS occurs, please
review them from
http://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/latest/yocto-project-qs/yocto-project-qs.html#packages.
This represents the latest QS version being prepared for 1.2 release.
Thanks,
Scott
-Original Message-
Agenda
* Opens collection - 5 min (Song)
* Yocto 1.2 M4 status - 20 min (Song/Team)
https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Yocto_Project_v1.2_Status
* SWAT team rotation: Paul -> Saul.
* Opens - 10 min
* Team Sharing - 20 min
-Original Appointment-
Conference details
Conference name:
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 07:27:16PM -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
[snip]
> You've mentioned preferring to do this with set versions of bitbake and
> oe-core. Do oe-core and bitbake maintain stable branches? I didn't think
> they did. This makes it difficult to stabilize a release, and poky
> serves thi
For those attending the BSP Summit remotely, I have also set up an IRC
channel for backchat. The channel is #yocto-bsp-summit on freenode.
Join with your favorite IRC client or go to:
http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=#yocto-bsp-summit
--
Jeff Osier-Mixon http://jefro.net/blog
Yocto Project
On Mon, 2012-04-02 at 17:23 +0800, Shane Wang wrote:
> In the current local.conf, BB_NUMBER_THREADS and PARALLEL_MAKE are assigned
> by '=', which overwrites the values set from the Hob. To avoid that, use '?='
> instead.
>
> [Yocto #2210]
>
> Signed-off-by: Shane Wang
> ---
> meta-yocto/conf/l
On Sun, 2012-04-01 at 21:08 -0700, Matthew McClintock wrote:
> I think we should consider a "standard way" of integrating layers and
> other bits. One method is (and I'm not recommending it) using 'git
> submodules' - another is 'androids repo command'. If all the distros
> (poky, angstrom, MEL, et
On Monday 02 April 2012 10:48:23 Barros Pena, Belen wrote:
> Thanks, Paul. What happens if the DISTRO is set to empty? Will the image
> build?
Yes it will still build, but it will use a default distro policy defined within
OE-Core; this may imply some minor differences in build output.
Cheers,
P
Thanks, Paul. What happens if the DISTRO is set to empty? Will the image
build?
Belen
On 30/03/2012 13:19, "Paul Eggleton" wrote:
>On Friday 30 March 2012 11:26:15 Barros Pena, Belen wrote:
>> On 30/03/2012 07:32, "Khem Raj" wrote:
>> >On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 4:05 AM, Barros Pena, Belen
>> > w
In the current local.conf, BB_NUMBER_THREADS and PARALLEL_MAKE are assigned
by '=', which overwrites the values set from the Hob. To avoid that, use '?='
instead.
[Yocto #2210]
Signed-off-by: Shane Wang
---
meta-yocto/conf/local.conf.sample |4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 delet
The patch is to change local.conf to allow Hob change BB threads and pmake.
Please review.
In the current local.conf, BB_NUMBER_THREADS and PARALLEL_MAKE are assigned
by '=', which overwrites the values set from the Hob. To avoid that, use '?='
instead.
The following changes since commit 8691a588
Hi all,
This is the weekly bug trend for WW13. The new submitted vs. fixed bug
number is 45 vs. 66. By comparing with WW12, open bug number for "Major",
"Normal" increased a lot. WDD number and Open Bug number are 866 and 174. Bug
status of WW13 could be found on
https://wiki.yoctoproje
12 matches
Mail list logo
