Hello Darren,
On Fri, 2012-03-02 at 08:06 -0800, Darren Hart wrote:
> Can you be more specific about what you are looking for? When you
> build an image with the cpio.gz image type, you can boot that as an
> initramfs
I find that the cpio.gz image is created by running the following
command insi
On Sun, Mar 04, 2012 at 04:38:36PM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Mar 2012, Gary Thomas wrote:
>
> > Can you explain what the toolchain problems are and why the versions
> > in oe-core don't work for meta-ti?
>
> i just finished doing a "bitbake core-image-minimal" for a
> beagleboa
This is an update of the linux-yocto 3.0 and 3.2 SRCREVs to bring
in the following updates:
- v3.0.23 stable update
- v3.2.9 stable update
- 3.0/3.2: fri2 updates (pch + configuration changes) from Darren Hart
- 3.0: pvr merge from Kishore Bodke
- linux-yocto/rt: update to 3.0.23-rt
Richard/Saul,
The hardware reference platforms need to be updated to the most recent
linux-yocto
changes in oe-core.
The commit message has all the details:
This is an update of the linux-yocto 3.0 and 3.2 SRCREVs to bring
in the following updates:
- v3.0.23 stable update
- v3.2.9 stable
Hi all,
The overall open bug trend increased a lot during last 2 weeks. WDD
number and Open Bug number are 819 and 164. QA began 1.2 M3 RC1 testing last
week. Bug status of WW09 could be found on
https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Yocto_Bug_Trend.
Best Regards,
Jiajun
On Sun, 4 Mar 2012, Gary Thomas wrote:
> Can you explain what the toolchain problems are and why the versions
> in oe-core don't work for meta-ti?
i just finished doing a "bitbake core-image-minimal" for a
beagleboard using the meta-ti layer, and having only to set a
preferred version for udev.
On Sun, 4 Mar 2012, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
> One of the issues:
>
> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/meta-ti/2012-February/000491.html
>
> I haven't tried if either 3.0 or a pending 3.1 update for Panda
> (from omapzoom/ti-ubuntu), resolve this gcc-4.6 build issue. But
> either way I bel
On Sun, Mar 04, 2012 at 12:45:01PM -0700, Gary Thomas wrote:
> On 2012-03-04 12:27, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
> >On Sun, Mar 04, 2012 at 01:14:17PM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> >>On Sun, 4 Mar 2012, Gary Thomas wrote:
> >>
> >>>On 2012-03-04 05:19, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
> not su
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Gary Thomas wrote:
> Can you explain what the toolchain problems are and why the versions in
> oe-core don't work for meta-ti?
I'd like to know this myself because I need to build 64bit & 32bit
toolchains (meta-toolchain) and currently I can only get both to build
On 2012-03-04 12:27, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
On Sun, Mar 04, 2012 at 01:14:17PM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
On Sun, 4 Mar 2012, Gary Thomas wrote:
On 2012-03-04 05:19, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
not sure if you're suggesting i should now be able to build
for, say, beagleboard with the m
On Sun, 4 Mar 2012, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 04, 2012 at 01:14:17PM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > On Sun, 4 Mar 2012, Gary Thomas wrote:
> >
> > > On 2012-03-04 05:19, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > > >
> > > >not sure if you're suggesting i should now be able to build
> > > >
On Sun, Mar 04, 2012 at 01:14:17PM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Mar 2012, Gary Thomas wrote:
>
> > On 2012-03-04 05:19, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > >
> > >not sure if you're suggesting i should now be able to build
> > > for, say, beagleboard with the meta-ti layer, but i cloned
On Sun, 4 Mar 2012, Gary Thomas wrote:
> On 2012-03-04 05:19, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> >
> >not sure if you're suggesting i should now be able to build
> > for, say, beagleboard with the meta-ti layer, but i cloned meta-ti
> > into my yocto tree, added that layer to bblayers.conf, and tried
>
Op 4 mrt. 2012, om 13:54 heeft Robert P. J. Day het volgende geschreven:
>
> ... much snipping below to get to the gist of it ...
>
> On Sun, 4 Mar 2012, Gary Thomas wrote:
>
>> On 2012-03-04 05:19, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>>>
>>> not sure if you're suggesting i should now be able to build
On Sun, 2012-03-04 at 16:14 +, Stewart, David C wrote:
> Yeah, the example is pretty old, dating back to the 1.0 (bernard) release.
>
> Tom - it might be time to retire it, you think?
>
Apparently, they're still useful to people, so I think updating rather
than retiring them makes more sens
On Sun, 2012-03-04 at 08:09 -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> yes, i know it's an editable wiki but i'd rather someone else make
> the changes just in case i'm misreading something. it's early, and
> there's only decaf in the place. this is bad.
>
> anyway, using this page as grist for discussi
just wandering through the yocto/poky reference manual, and it seems
that some of the lists there are missing a few entries.
first, in the images section,
file:///home/rpjday/yocto/git/documentation/poky-ref-manual/poky-ref-manual.html#ref-images
if you run the given command:
$ ls meta*/
Yeah, the example is pretty old, dating back to the 1.0 (bernard) release.
Tom - it might be time to retire it, you think?
>-Original Message-
>From: yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto-
>boun...@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Robert P. J. Day
>Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2012 5:09
Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day
---
diff --git a/documentation/dev-manual/dev-manual-start.xml
b/documentation/dev-manual/dev-manual-start.xml
index 2a93ec6..5627c82 100644
--- a/documentation/dev-manual/dev-manual-start.xml
+++ b/documentation/dev-manual/dev-manual-start.xml
@@ -86,7 +86,8 @@
yes, i know it's an editable wiki but i'd rather someone else make
the changes just in case i'm misreading something. it's early, and
there's only decaf in the place. this is bad.
anyway, using this page as grist for discussion:
https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Transcript:_from_git_check
... much snipping below to get to the gist of it ...
On Sun, 4 Mar 2012, Gary Thomas wrote:
> On 2012-03-04 05:19, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> >
> >not sure if you're suggesting i should now be able to build
> > for, say, beagleboard with the meta-ti layer, but i cloned meta-ti
> > into my yoc
On 2012-03-04 05:19, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
On Sun, 4 Mar 2012, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 04:18:41PM -0700, Gary Thomas wrote:
On 2012-03-02 15:50, William Mills wrote:
We will update the README when it is merely in need of testing.
Today, we know there is code that do
On Sun, 4 Mar 2012, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 04:18:41PM -0700, Gary Thomas wrote:
> > On 2012-03-02 15:50, William Mills wrote:
> > >We will update the README when it is merely in need of testing.
> > >Today, we know there is code that does not work with GCC 4.6.
> > >Tod
i'm perfectly prepared to be told this is not the right forum to
mention this, but i just cloned the meta-ti layer and in conf/machine,
there appear to be two pandaboard-related files:
omap4430-panda.conf:
#@TYPE: Machine
#@NAME: OMAP4430 Panda
#@DESCRIPTION: Machine configuration for the OM
24 matches
Mail list logo
