On 11-12-09 5:52 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
Bruce,
I'm looking at introducing a new kernel type, ktypes/tiny.
Tiny will define a core set of kernel policy options, such as proc, sys,
devtmpfs, futex, epoll, elf bin format, etc. It will not enable any
drivers, filesystems, debug options, or networki
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 1:55 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 7:46 AM, McClintock Matthew-B29882
> wrote:
>>> I'd certainly be happy to see such a branch. It might be more
>>> appropriate to call it 2011-1 which corresponds to the OE-Core branch
>>> name that is edison in the poky repo
On 12/09/2011 02:52 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
> Bruce,
>
> I'm looking at introducing a new kernel type, ktypes/tiny.
>
> Tiny will define a core set of kernel policy options, such as proc, sys,
> devtmpfs, futex, epoll, elf bin format, etc. It will not enable any
> drivers, filesystems, debug optio
On Fri, 2011-12-09 at 11:36 -0500, Philip Balister wrote:
> On 12/09/2011 11:20 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > On Fri, 2011-12-09 at 15:46 +, McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote:
> >> On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 5:51 AM, Richard Purdie
> >> wrote:
> >>> On Thu, 2011-12-08 at 20:01 +, McClintock Matt
On 09/12/11 15:42, David Smoot wrote:
> I noticed that the routerstation pro hardware no longer appears on
> Ubiquiti Networks product page. Their sales rep confirmed it is being
> EOL February 1, 2012. Since that is the Yocto reference MIPS
> platform, I thought you would like to know.
Yikes, t
I noticed that the routerstation pro hardware no longer appears on
Ubiquiti Networks product page. Their sales rep confirmed it is being
EOL February 1, 2012. Since that is the Yocto reference MIPS
platform, I thought you would like to know.
It does make my problem with Mediatomb seg faulting on
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 5:47 PM, Richard Purdie
wrote:
> Having said that, if you enable sstate checksums on the stamp files, you
> will get a system that is *much* more responsive to change. With that
> enabled you could:
Isn't this the default behaviour (i.e. sstate checksums enabled on the
stam
On 12/09/2011 02:52 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
> There are three patches in standard, only two of which (the perf ones)
> are listed in the standard.scc. As I believe any kernel we build should
> have these, I would like to see any global patches applied to base,
> leaving standard to define policy,
Bruce,
I'm looking at introducing a new kernel type, ktypes/tiny.
Tiny will define a core set of kernel policy options, such as proc, sys,
devtmpfs, futex, epoll, elf bin format, etc. It will not enable any
drivers, filesystems, debug options, or networking options by default.
This would be the r
On 12/09/2011 01:17 PM, Stewart, David C wrote:
> Are we going to diagnose why rootless X is broken and fix it?
We should indeed, and I am testing on atom-pc now to confirm it also
fails there as I suspect it will. Then I will open a ROOTLESS_X bug. But
for M1, just dropping it is the right fix.
Are we going to diagnose why rootless X is broken and fix it?
>-Original Message-
>From: yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto-
>boun...@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Darren Hart
>Sent: Friday, December 09, 2011 12:52 PM
>To: Yocto Project; Zanussi, Tom; Saul Wold
>Subject: [yocto
Fixes [YOCTO #1797]
Building with ROOTLESS_X results in X failing start with
the following error:
i915 :00:02.0: VGA-1: EDID block 0 invalid.
(EE) AIGLX error: dlopen of /usr/lib/dri/i915_dri.so failed
(/usr/lib/dri/i915_dri)
(EE) AIGLX: reverting to software rendering
(EE) AIGLX error: dlope
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 2:41 AM, Navani Kamal Srivastava
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I am compiling Qt-4.6.3 with yocto for ARM architecture. Can you please tell
> me which and all utilities I am supposed to compile to get moc and uic
> binaries. I tried bitbake -b meta-toolchain.bb to get theses binaries
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 7:46 AM, McClintock Matthew-B29882
wrote:
>> I'd certainly be happy to see such a branch. It might be more
>> appropriate to call it 2011-1 which corresponds to the OE-Core branch
>> name that is edison in the poky repo.
>
> Well I don't particularly care if we create a repo
On 08/12/11 21:07, Sathishkumar Duraisamy wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 10:28 AM, Joshua Lock wrote:
>> On 08/12/11 20:52, Sathishkumar Duraisamy wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I migrating from Openembedded to yocto project and using Beagleboard
>>> as playground.
>>>
>>> On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 3:27 AM,
On 08/12/11 21:18, Sathishkumar Duraisamy wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 10:37 AM, Sathishkumar Duraisamy
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 10:28 AM, Joshua Lock wrote:
>>> On 08/12/11 20:52, Sathishkumar Duraisamy wrote:
Hi,
I migrating from Openembedded to yocto project and usi
On 12/09/2011 12:30 AM, David Nyström wrote:
>
>
> From: Darren Hart [dvh...@linux.intel.com]
> Sent: Friday, December 09, 2011 00:52
> To: Richard Purdie
> Cc: Bruce Ashfield; David Nyström; Paul Eggleton; yocto@yoctoproject.org
> Subject: Re: [yocto] Va
Adds License File
Fixes [YOCTO #1816]
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold
---
meta-tlk/COPYING.MIT | 17 +
1 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 meta-tlk/COPYING.MIT
diff --git a/meta-tlk/COPYING.MIT b/meta-tlk/COPYING.MIT
new file mode 100644
index 0
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 5:47 PM, Richard Purdie
wrote:
> Imagine you have:
>
> core-image-minimal setting PREFERRED_PROVIDER = "kernelA" and
> core-image-minima-debug setting PREFERRED_PROVIDER = "kernelB". Both
> would depend on "virtual/kernel". You then run:
>
> "bitbake core-image-minimal core-
Hi,
I am compiling Qt-4.6.3 with yocto for ARM architecture. Can you please tell me
which and all utilities I am supposed to compile to get moc and uic binaries. I
tried bitbake -b meta-toolchain.bb to get theses binaries but it it giving me
following error-
Processing task-poky-standalone-sdk
On 12/09/2011 11:20 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-12-09 at 15:46 +, McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 5:51 AM, Richard Purdie
>> wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2011-12-08 at 20:01 +, McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote:
Hi all,
Can we create a meta-oe rep
On Fri, 2011-12-09 at 15:46 +, McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 5:51 AM, Richard Purdie
> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2011-12-08 at 20:01 +, McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> Can we create a meta-oe repo in git.yoctoproject.org?
> >
> > This might crea
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 5:51 AM, Richard Purdie
wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-12-08 at 20:01 +, McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Can we create a meta-oe repo in git.yoctoproject.org?
>
> This might create a little friction with the OE community. What would be
> the reason for the repos
On Thu, 2011-12-08 at 20:01 +, McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Can we create a meta-oe repo in git.yoctoproject.org?
This might create a little friction with the OE community. What would be
the reason for the repository?
> I'd like to also
> create a branh within the repo tha
From: Darren Hart [dvh...@linux.intel.com]
Sent: Friday, December 09, 2011 00:52
To: Richard Purdie
Cc: Bruce Ashfield; David Nyström; Paul Eggleton; yocto@yoctoproject.org
Subject: Re: [yocto] Variable locality too restricted.
On 12/08/2011 03:12 PM, Rich
25 matches
Mail list logo
