Re: [yocto] Missing patch files in SRC_URIs

2011-08-24 Thread Chris Tapp
Hi Paul, On 24 Aug 2011, at 12:11, Paul Eggleton wrote: Hi Chris, On Wednesday 24 August 2011 08:59:15 Chris Tapp wrote: bitbake doesn't seem to be detecting missing patch files. In a .bbappend file (for linux-wrs_git) I have: SRC_URI += " file://defconfig" SRC_URI_append_Vortex86DX = "\

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 0/1] script/runqemu: change boot command line for qemuppc

2011-08-24 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 11-08-24 04:48 AM, Liming Wang wrote: This patch is just a workaround to speed up boot time of qemuppc, because qemuppc has no framebuffer support, no need to start X server for qemuppc. Richard suggested to fix the X scripts so that if an fbdev X server is in use and the framebuffer device

Re: [yocto] [fedora-arm] ARM summit at Plumbers 2011

2011-08-24 Thread Bill Gatliff
Luke: Step back from the keyboard just a bit. :) It's true that the glass isn't completely full--- but it's pretty darned full! And we wouldn't be discussing the various GPL and other violations that you cite were it not for the overwhelming successes of Free Software, ARM, Linux, and Android.

Re: [yocto] [fedora-arm] ARM summit at Plumbers 2011

2011-08-24 Thread Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 07:15:34PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: >Hi folks, > >Following on from the founding of the cross-distro ARM mailing list, >I'd like to propose an ARM summit at this year's Linux Plumbers >conference [1]. I'm hoping for a slot on Thursday evening, but this >remains to be con

Re: [yocto] ARM 3D support was Re: [fedora-arm] ARM summit at Plumbers 2011

2011-08-24 Thread Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
[ok i'm going to do another cross-post in a bit which will give some background and also perhaps some other topics for discussion, but i wanted to cover this first. apologies for people for whom this is just noise] On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 7:01 PM, wrote: >>  the xilinx zynq-7000 or similar (du

[yocto] ARM 3D support was Re: [fedora-arm] ARM summit at Plumbers 2011

2011-08-24 Thread omalleys
Quoting Gordan Bobic : Unfortunately there is no way I could make it, but on the subject of 3D support on ARM, Luke recently mentioned something that initially seemed outlandish but upon closer examination doesn't seem like a bad idea. As we all know, the state of openness of specifications o

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 1/1] x86: fix a bug of wrong return erorr.

2011-08-24 Thread Wang Liming
On 08/24/11 21:40, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 11-08-23 10:45 PM, Liming Wang wrote: __vdso_clock_gettime should fall back to call vdso_fallback_gettime function if no clockid is selected, not just return error. At a glance, this seems reasonable to me .. and then I looked a bit more. This is in

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 1/1] x86: fix a bug of wrong return erorr.

2011-08-24 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 11-08-23 10:45 PM, Liming Wang wrote: __vdso_clock_gettime should fall back to call vdso_fallback_gettime function if no clockid is selected, not just return error. At a glance, this seems reasonable to me .. and then I looked a bit more. This is in fact introduced by lttng and the ENIVAL do

Re: [yocto] Missing patch files in SRC_URIs

2011-08-24 Thread Paul Eggleton
Hi Chris, On Wednesday 24 August 2011 08:59:15 Chris Tapp wrote: > bitbake doesn't seem to be detecting missing patch files. In > a .bbappend file (for linux-wrs_git) I have: > > SRC_URI += " file://defconfig" > > SRC_URI_append_Vortex86DX = "\ > file://there-is-no.patch;patch=1 " FYI

Re: [yocto] ARM 3D support was Re: [fedora-arm] ARM summit at Plumbers 2011

2011-08-24 Thread Gordan Bobic
On Wed, 24 Aug 2011 12:00:43 +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: [ok i'm going to do another cross-post in a bit which will give some background and also perhaps some other topics for discussion, but i wanted to cover this first. apologies for people for whom this is just noise] On Tue,

[yocto] Missing patch files in SRC_URIs

2011-08-24 Thread Chris Tapp
bitbake doesn't seem to be detecting missing patch files. In a .bbappend file (for linux-wrs_git) I have: SRC_URI += " file://defconfig" SRC_URI_append_Vortex86DX = "\ file://there-is-no.patch;patch=1 " FILESEXTRAPATHS_prepend := "${THISDIR}/${PN}" bitbake -c patch -f virtual/kern

[yocto] [PATCH 1/1] script/runqemu: change boot command line for qemuppc

2011-08-24 Thread Liming Wang
Because qemuppc has no graphic emulation, remove console=tty0 and make it run into 3 run level. This can reduce boot time for qemuppc booting. Signed-off-by: Liming Wang --- scripts/runqemu-internal |4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/scripts/runqemu-inter

[yocto] [PATCH 0/1] script/runqemu: change boot command line for qemuppc

2011-08-24 Thread Liming Wang
This patch is just a workaround to speed up boot time of qemuppc, because qemuppc has no framebuffer support, no need to start X server for qemuppc. Richard suggested to fix the X scripts so that if an fbdev X server is in use and the framebuffer device node does not exist, it just exits cleanly

Re: [yocto] Tested host distros for 1.1

2011-08-24 Thread Paul Eggleton
On Wednesday 24 August 2011 02:59:07 you wrote: > > We now have the mechanism for fixing bug #1096 [1] i.e. showing a > > warning if the user is running a build on a distro that has not been > > tested; however to make this work what we now need is a list of > > distributions we want to consider te