> >> Does not changing this "%d" to "%s" work?
> >
> > Yes, this is the correct fix. Nobody has been around today to push
> the fix into
> > the tree however.
> >
> > It was a simple typo.
>
> I managed to catch Richard on IRC about an hour ago and he pushed a fix
> to master.
>
> Scott
Hi, Sco
On 02/12/2011 02:38 PM, Mark Hatle wrote:
On 2/12/11 1:17 PM, Gary Thomas wrote:
On 02/12/2011 12:08 PM, Koen Kooi wrote:
Op 12 feb 2011, om 19:09 heeft Mark Hatle het volgende geschreven:
On 2/12/11 3:30 AM, Cui, Dexuan wrote:
Hi Mark,
As Liping said, the following change breaks building x
On 2/12/11 1:17 PM, Gary Thomas wrote:
> On 02/12/2011 12:08 PM, Koen Kooi wrote:
>>
>> Op 12 feb 2011, om 19:09 heeft Mark Hatle het volgende geschreven:
>>
>>> On 2/12/11 3:30 AM, Cui, Dexuan wrote:
Hi Mark,
As Liping said, the following change breaks building xorg-minimal-fonts as
>>>
On 02/12/2011 12:08 PM, Koen Kooi wrote:
Op 12 feb 2011, om 19:09 heeft Mark Hatle het volgende geschreven:
On 2/12/11 3:30 AM, Cui, Dexuan wrote:
Hi Mark,
As Liping said, the following change breaks building xorg-minimal-fonts as
destdir is not correct.
Can you please explain the actual dif
Op 12 feb 2011, om 19:09 heeft Mark Hatle het volgende geschreven:
> On 2/12/11 3:30 AM, Cui, Dexuan wrote:
>> Hi Mark,
>> As Liping said, the following change breaks building xorg-minimal-fonts as
>> destdir is not correct.
>> Can you please explain the actual different between cp and tar here?
On 2/12/11 3:30 AM, Cui, Dexuan wrote:
> Hi Mark,
> As Liping said, the following change breaks building xorg-minimal-fonts as
> destdir is not correct.
> Can you please explain the actual different between cp and tar here? I think
> "cp -p" is similar to "tar -x -p" here?
>
We can revert the c
Hi Mark,
As Liping said, the following change breaks building xorg-minimal-fonts as
destdir is not correct.
Can you please explain the actual different between cp and tar here? I think
"cp -p" is similar to "tar -x -p" here?
@@ -706,17 +720,17 @@ class FetchMethod(object):
