Yeh... It's quite a milestone since it's our first contribution to the
community...
Cheers,
Jessica
Ke, Liping wrote:
> Hi, Jessica
>
> FYI.
> TCF terminal/shell java code part is now in upstream.
>
> Thanks& Regards,
> criping
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: bugzilla-dae...@eclipse.or
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 5:49 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
> We're in a position where we have people wanting to extend Poky but
> wondering exactly how to add their own layer and make Poky useful for
> their specific use cases.
>
> This is a topic I want to work with the OE community on and have
> dis
Hi all,
This is the Weekly Test Report for nightly build 20101204. Toolchain and
qemuppc sdk testing is blocked because build for them failed. Netbook testing
is also blocked because of a new installation bug.
Other failed cases are caused by known bugs in bugzilla. Zypper still
that's a great news. So now all of our eclipse enhancements are in upstream!
Thanks
Kevin
>From: Ke, Liping
>Sent: Thursday, December 09, 2010 9:44 AM
>
>Hi, Jessica
>
>FYI.
>TCF terminal/shell java code part is now in upstream.
>
>Thanks& Regards,
>criping
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From
Hi, Jessica
FYI.
TCF terminal/shell java code part is now in upstream.
Thanks& Regards,
criping
> -Original Message-
> From: bugzilla-dae...@eclipse.org [mailto:bugzilla-dae...@eclipse.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2010 11:54 PM
> To: Ke, Liping
> Subject: [Bug 246987] [tcf] Would
On 12/08/2010 12:20 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 10-12-08 09:35 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
In order to extend and create more kernel recipes based on the
supported yocto kernel common routines need to be placed in
re-usable blocks.
There may be a minor problem with this, stay tuned.
I just had
> > >
> > Thanks Richard for the clarification. So what would be possible
> > solution for this circular dependency issue? I can check if we can
> get
> > the latest gnu-config via cvs. Any other or better solution?
>
> Is there a release tarball we can use? If not, we might end up hosting
> a
> r
On 10-12-08 03:20 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 10-12-08 09:35 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
In order to extend and create more kernel recipes based on the
supported yocto kernel common routines need to be placed in
re-usable blocks.
There may be a minor problem with this, stay tuned.
I just had a
On 10-12-08 09:35 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
In order to extend and create more kernel recipes based on the
supported yocto kernel common routines need to be placed in
re-usable blocks.
To accomplish this meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_git.bb
is broken into three parts:
}
-COMPATI
On 10-12-08 09:35 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
In order to extend and create more kernel recipes based on the
supported yocto kernel common routines need to be placed in
re-usable blocks.
There may be a minor problem with this, stay tuned.
I just had a strange failure when I built the 2.6.37
kern
On 10-12-08 09:35 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
Richard,
FYI: Darren pointed out that these should go to poky@
as well, so any follow ups will go to both lists. Sorry
about the initial miss!
Cheers,
Bruce
Consider these patches for merging. I've been building and working
with these for 2 weeks
On 12/08/2010 12:32 AM, Xu, Jiajun wrote:
>>
>> I wanted to give people a heads up about the addition of a few more
>> targets to the nightly build and how they'll effect the nightly (and our
>> overall efficency).
>>
>> This bug asks for the addition of a few targets:
>>
>> arm: beagleboard: poky
On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 08:29 -0800, Kamble, Nitin A wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 19:15 -0800, Kamble, Nitin A wrote:
> > > I am getting following bitbake error. I also tried passing –D
> > option
> > > to bitbake, but I did not find anything useful. Also bellow is the
> > > change which is
On 12/08/2010 04:49 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
Hi,
We're in a position where we have people wanting to extend Poky but
wondering exactly how to add their own layer and make Poky useful for
their specific use cases.
This is a topic I want to work with the OE community on and have
discussion about
> On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 19:15 -0800, Kamble, Nitin A wrote:
> > I am getting following bitbake error. I also tried passing –D
> option
> > to bitbake, but I did not find anything useful. Also bellow is the
> > change which is causing this error.
> >
> > I don’t see anything oblivious here. As I
In order to extend and create more kernel recipes based on the
supported yocto kernel common routines need to be placed in
re-usable blocks.
To accomplish this meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_git.bb
is broken into three parts:
- meta/classes/kernel-yocto.bbclass: contains common routines
commit e388771458b4ff3ad81ab70e390b24d069647da4 in the upstream
kernel factored/cleaned the SP804 timer code. This commit exposed
issues in the qemu timer emulation that was dependent on the
old behaviour. As a result, no kernel past 2.6.34 would boot on
qemu-system-arm.
The quick fix is to backpo
Modify linux-libc-headers-yocto to use the common linux-yocto
routines, so headers exported to userspace will track the
branches in the yocto kernel git repository.
This commit also switches supported boards to prefer the
yocto libc headers.
Signed-off-by: Bruce Ashfield
---
.../linux-libc-head
Richard,
Consider these patches for merging. I've been building and working
with these for 2 weeks now, and while they aren't perfect, they
work and we need more eyes on 2.6.37.
What we get is the following:
- factoring of the code into some reusable routines in the form
of a linux-yocto bbc
On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 07:08 -0700, Chris Larson wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 5:49 AM, Richard Purdie
> wrote:
> > We're in a position where we have people wanting to extend Poky but
> > wondering exactly how to add their own layer and make Poky useful for
> > their specific use cases.
> >
> >
Hi,
We're in a position where we have people wanting to extend Poky but
wondering exactly how to add their own layer and make Poky useful for
their specific use cases.
This is a topic I want to work with the OE community on and have
discussion about but equally, people are interested at the momen
Hi Nitin,
On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 19:15 -0800, Kamble, Nitin A wrote:
> I am getting following bitbake error. I also tried passing –D option
> to bitbake, but I did not find anything useful. Also bellow is the
> change which is causing this error.
>
> I don’t see anything oblivious here. As I un
Lu, Lianhao wrote:
> Richard Purdie wrote on 2010-12-08:
>> Hi Lianhao,
>>
>> On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 00:02 -0800, Lu, Lianhao wrote:
>>> I'm wondering whether"-sysroot" is enough for our current design
>>> that the rootfs used by toolchain can be copied by the user to
>>> various locations? I just
And Jessica
If you have no rights to modify my branch tree ( I am not sure), you can check
it in your own branch.
We can merge it later.
Thanks a lot!
criping
> -Original Message-
> From: Ke, Liping
> Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2010 5:35 PM
> To: Zhang, Jessica; Tian, Kevin; Lu, Lia
Hi, Jessica
I have check the script in my branch tree (branch origin/lke/master), please
check @ http://git.pokylinux.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/log/?h=lke/master
After checkout, directly goto poky_tree/script/adt_installer, everything is
there.
Thanks& Regards,
criping
> -Original
>
> I wanted to give people a heads up about the addition of a few more
> targets to the nightly build and how they'll effect the nightly (and our
> overall efficency).
>
> This bug asks for the addition of a few targets:
>
> arm: beagleboard: poky-image-sato, poky-image-minimal, poky-image-sdk
26 matches
Mail list logo
