Re: [yocto] Update glib-2.0 from 2.7 to 2.8

2024-07-30 Thread Alexander Kanavin
I'd suggest you rebase your setup to master branches of all involved yocto layers. If you're not shipping a product, being on top of master is really a better option, as you'll get newest software, and can make more disruptive improvements to layers. Alex On Tue, 30 Jul 2024 at 02:23, MOHAMMED HA

Re: [yocto] Update glib-2.0 from 2.7 to 2.8

2024-07-29 Thread MOHAMMED HASSAN
Well, I see your point. Thanks! On Tue, Jul 30, 2024 at 8:10 AM Khem Raj wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 5:23 PM MOHAMMED HASSAN via lists.yoctoproject.org > wrote: > >> Well, I seem to be facing issue with the bluez stack. Though it builds >> well, functionality wise I think it doesn’t w

Re: [yocto] Update glib-2.0 from 2.7 to 2.8

2024-07-29 Thread Khem Raj
On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 5:23 PM MOHAMMED HASSAN via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote: > Well, I seem to be facing issue with the bluez stack. Though it builds > well, functionality wise I think it doesn’t work as intended. So I wanted > to try building it on the board using the source code. Now the

Re: [yocto] Update glib-2.0 from 2.7 to 2.8

2024-07-29 Thread MOHAMMED HASSAN
Well, I seem to be facing issue with the bluez stack. Though it builds well, functionality wise I think it doesn’t work as intended. So I wanted to try building it on the board using the source code. Now the source code wants glib-2 2.8 . Also, on a second thought how do you guys work your way ar

Re: [yocto] Update glib-2.0 from 2.7 to 2.8

2024-07-29 Thread Alexander Kanavin
You can try, but this is likely to unravel into a mass scale upgrade of half of oe-core recipes, and you're on your own trying to make it work. I would suggest simply moving to a tagged master milestone rather. Where is the requirement coming from? Alex On Mon, 29 Jul 2024 at 06:46, MOHAMMED HAS